Much attention has focused on the social, institutional, and mobilization factors that influence political participation, with a renewed interest in psychological motivations. One trait that has a deep theoretical connection to participation, but remains underexplored, is narcissism. Relying on three studies in the United States and Denmark, two nationally representative, we find that those scoring higher in narcissism, as measured by the Narcissistic Personality Inventory–40 (NPI-40), participate more in politics, including contacting politicians, signing petitions, joining demonstrations, donating money, and voting in midterm elections. Both agentic and antagonistic components of narcissism were positively and negatively related to different types of political participation when exploring the subfactors independently. Superiority and Authority/Leadership were positively related to participation, while Self Sufficiency was negatively related to participation. In addition, the combined Entitlement/Exploitativeness factor was negatively related to turnout, but only in midterm elections. Overall, the findings support a view of participation that arises in part from instrumental motivations.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure?Assessment, 18(1), 67–87.
2.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–450.
3.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037.
4.
BarryC. T.FrickP. J.KillianA. L. (2003). The relation of narcissism and self-esteem to conduct problems in children: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(1), 139–152.
5.
BöcklerA.SharifiM.KanskeP.DziobekI.SingerT. (2017). Social decision making in narcissism: Reduced generosity and increased retaliation are driven by alterations in perspective-taking and anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 1–7.
6.
BrummelmanE.ThomaesS.SedikidesC. (2016). Separating narcissism from self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 8–13.
7.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229.
8.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45.
9.
CampbellW. K.BushC. P.BrunellA. B.SheltonJ. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1358–1368.
10.
CampbellW. K.FosterC. A.FinkelE. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 340–354.
11.
CampbellW. K.RudichE. A.SedikidesC. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 358–368.
12.
CarminesE. G.EnsleyM. J.WagnerM. W. (2018). The role of populists in the 2016 U.S.presidential election and beyond. In GreenJ. C.CoffeyD. J.CohenD. B. (Eds.), The state of the parties 2018: The changing role of contemporary American political parties (pp. 198–209). Rowman & Littlefield.
CorryN.MerrittR. D.MrugS.PampB. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 593–600.
15.
CroweM. L.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151–1169.
16.
de ZavalaA. G.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16–28.
17.
de ZavalaA. G.GuerraR.SimãoC. (2017). The relationship between the Brexit vote and individual predictors of prejudice: Collective narcissism, right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2023.
18.
The Economist. (2016, August18). Normalising narcissism. The Economist, 420(9003), 30.
19.
EmmonsR. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 291–300.
20.
FedericoC. M.de ZavalaA. G. (2018). Collective narcissism and the 2016 U.S. presidential vote. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 110–121.
21.
FormisanoR. (2016). The populist tsunami of the second gilded age. The Forum, 14(3), 281–294.
22.
FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.TwengeJ. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 469–486.
23.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
24.
GilensM.PageB. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(03), 564–581.
25.
GlasserS. (2016). Covering politics in a “post-truth" America. Brookings Institution Press.
26.
GrijalvaE.HarmsP. D.NewmanD. A.GaddisB. H.FraleyR. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1–47.
27.
HatemiP. K.FazekasZ. (2018). Narcissism and political orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 873–888.
28.
KamC. D.PalmerC. L. (2008). Reconsidering the effects of education on political participation. The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 612–631.
29.
KarpJ.BrockingtonD. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries. The Journal of Politics, 67(3), 825–840.
30.
KlandermansB.OegemaD. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531.
31.
KlofstadC. A. (2010). The lasting effect of civic talk on civic participation: Evidence from a panel study. Social Forces, 88(5), 2353–2375.
32.
KubarychT. S.DearyI. J.AustinE. J. (2004). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Factor structure in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 857–872.
33.
LambeS.Hamilton-GiachritsisC.GarnerE.WalkerJ. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 209–230.
34.
LeckeltM.KüfnerA. C.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 856–871.
35.
LukianoffG.HaidtJ. (2015, September). The coddling of the American mind. The Atlantic, 1, 9–15.
36.
LyonsP. A.KenworthyJ. B.PopanJ. R. (2010). Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of U.S. citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1267–1280.
37.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.PanayiotouO.CastellanosK.BataynehJ. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162.
38.
McAdamsD. (2016, June). The mind of Donald Trump. The Atlantic, pp. 76–90.
39.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042.
40.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.HyattC. S.CampbellW. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 291–315.
41.
PincusA. L.LukowitskyM. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446.
42.
RaskinR.HallC. S. (1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590.
43.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.
44.
SpenceJ. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40(12), 1285–1295.
45.
TwengeJ. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—And more miserable than ever before. Simon & Schuster.
46.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Simon & Schuster.
47.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.FreemanE. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045–1062.
48.
TwengeJ. M.FosterJ. D. (2010). Birth cohort increases in narcissistic personality traits among American college students, 1982–2009. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 99–106.
49.
TwengeJ. M.KonrathS.FosterJ. D.Keith CampbellW.BushmanB. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902.
50.
Van VugtM. (2009). Averting the tragedy of the commons: Using social psychological science to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 169–173.
51.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
52.
WetzelE.BrownA.HillP. L.ChungJ. M.RobinsR. W.RobertsB. W. (2017). The narcissism epidemic is dead; long live the narcissism epidemic. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1833–1847.
53.
WolfeT. (1976, August). The me decade and the third great awakening. New York Magazine, 23, 26–40.
ZakariaF. (2016, October17). Populism on the March: Why the West is in trouble. Foreign Affairs, 95, 9–15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
