Five experiments investigated a previously unrecognized phenomenon—remembering that one enacted a mundane behavioral decision when one only intended to do so—and its psychological mechanisms. The theoretical conceptualization advanced in this research proposes that this error stems from a misattribution when an intention and a behavior are similar. Intentions and behaviors are similar when the physical aspects of the behavior resemble the intention (e.g., both require similar keystrokes) and when the behavior and the intention share mental contents (e.g., both rely on the same criterion). Experiments 1 and 2 introduced a paradigm with similar intentions and enactments and showed misreports and subsequent performance errors even when controlling for guessing. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated greater confusion when the physical involvement and mental criteria for intention and behavior were similar. Finally, Experiment 5 indicated that monitoring enactment is highly effective at reducing this error and more effective than monitoring intention.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
2.
AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.FishbeinM.MuellerleileP. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142
3.
AlbarracínD.WyerR. S.Jr (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 5.
4.
AlbarracínD.WyerR. S.Jr. (2001). Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276005
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
8.
CottonJ. L. (1981). A review of research on Schachter’s theory of emotion and the misattribution of arousal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 365–397.
9.
DeeseJ. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671
10.
EngelkampJ. (1998). Memory for actions. Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis.
11.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
12.
FollowsS. B.JobberD. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010322009
13.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.FriedmanR. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307303029
14.
FryeG. J.LordC. G.BradyS. E. (2012). Attitude change following imagined positive actions toward a social group: Do memories change attitudes, or attitudes change memories?Social Cognition, 30(3), 307–322.
15.
GarryM.ManningC. G.LoftusE. F.ShermanS. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212420
16.
GibbonsF. X.GerrardM.LaneD. J. (2003). A social-reaction model of adolescent health risk. In SulsJ. J.WallstonK. A. (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illnes. Blackwell.
17.
GlasmanL. R.AlbarracínD. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP.MichalskiV.SeifertA. E. (2009). When intentions go public: Does social reality widen the intention-behavior gap?Psychological Science, 20, 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02336.x
20.
GoschkeT.KuhlJ. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1211
21.
HornsteinS. L.MulliganN. W. (2004). Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 367–372.
22.
HymanI. E.JrPentlandJ. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 101–117.
23.
JohnsonM. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 390–394.
24.
JohnsonM. K. (1997). Source monitoring and memory distortion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1362), 1733–1745.
KlugerA. N.TikochinskyJ. (2001). The error of accepting the “theoretical” null hypothesis: The rise, fall, and resurrection of commonsense hypotheses in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.408
27.
LangnerO.DotschR.BijlstraG.WigboldusD. H. J.HawkS. T.van KnippenbergA. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903485076
28.
LibbyL. K. (2003). Imagery perspective and source monitoring in imagination inflation. Memory & Cognition, 31(7), 1072–1081. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196128
MarshR. L.HicksJ. L.BinkM. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.2.350
31.
MasicampoE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (2011). Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024192
32.
MasicampoE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (2012). Committed but closed-minded: When making a specific plan for a goal hinders Success. Social Cognition, 30, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.37
33.
McCullochK. C.FitzsimonsG. M.ChuaS. N.AlbarracínD. (2011). Vicarious goal satiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 685–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.019
34.
NilssonL. G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In TulvingE.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137–148). Oxford University Press.
35.
PayneB. K.HallD. L.CameronC. D.BisharaA. J. (2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1397–1408.
36.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
37.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of change. Irwin.
38.
ProchaskaJ. O.NorcrossJ. C. (2006). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis (6th ed.). Brooks-Cole.
39.
RajagopalP.MontgomeryN. V. (2011). I imagine, I experience, I like: The false experience effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1086/660165
ShahJ. Y.FriedmanR.KruglanskiA. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1261.
42.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W. (2000). Aspects of goal networks: Implications for self-regulation. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 85–110). Academic Press.
43.
SparrowB.WegnerD. M. (2006). Unpriming: The deactivation of thoughts through expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1009–1019.
44.
SteffensM. C. (1999). The role of relational processing in memory for actions: A negative enactment effect in free recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 52(4), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755860
45.
SteffensM. C.BuchnerA.WenderK. F.DeckerC. (2007). Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: Enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1841–1853. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192919
46.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
47.
ZeigarnikB. (1927). Uber das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen [On remembering finished and unfinished activities]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1–85.
48.
ZimmerH. D.CohenR. L. (2001). Remembering actions: A specific type of memory? In ZimmerH. D.CohenR. L.GuynnM. J.EngelkampJ.Kormi-NouriR.FoleyM. A. (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 3–24). Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
