Despite constituting a large portion of society, single people—and their satisfaction with singlehood and life—are rarely examined in their own right. How happy are single people and does their happiness change over time? In 3,439 people followed over 10 years, we found that people reported being more satisfied than not, but both singlehood satisfaction and life satisfaction declined over time. Older adults, men, and highly educated people, and people with worse health reported lower singlehood satisfaction. Constrained random-intercept cross-lagged panel models suggested that singlehood and life satisfaction had lagged bidirectional influences with each other. Results are discussed in the context of the origins of singlehood satisfaction and life satisfaction.
AntonucciT. C.AjrouchK. J.BirdittK. S. (2013). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82–92.
2.
ApostolouM.MatogianI.KoskeridouG.ShialosM.GeorgiadouP. (2019). The price of singlehood: Assessing the impact of involuntary singlehood on emotions and life satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(4), 416-425.
3.
BairdB. M.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 183–203.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
5.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.
6.
BögerA.HuxholdO. (2020). The Changing relationship between partnership status and loneliness: Effects related to aging and historical time. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 75(7), 1423–1432.
7.
BrownS. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 583-601.
8.
BrüderlJosefDrobničSonjaHankKarstenNeyerFranz J.WalperSabineAltPhilippBorschelElisabethBozoyanChristianeGarrettMadisonGeisslerSvenjaAvilésTita GonzalezGröplerNicolaiHajekKristinHerzigMichelHuyer-MayBernadetteLenkeRüdigerLorenzRenateLutzKatharinaMinkusLaraPeterTimoPhanTrangPreetzRichardReimJuliaSawatzkiBarbaraSchmiedebergClaudiaSchützePhilippSchumannNinaThönnissenCarolinTimmermannKatharinaWetzelMartin. 2019. The German Family Panel (pairfam). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5678 Data file Version 12.0.0, doi.org/10.4232/pairfam.5678.12.0.0
9.
CheungE. O.GardnerW. L.AndersonJ. F. (2015). Emotionships: Examining people’s emotion-regulation relationships and their consequences for well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 407–414.
10.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2809–2818.
11.
ChopikW. J. (2017). Associations among relational values, support, health, and well-being across the adult lifespan. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 408–422.
12.
ConleyT. D.ZieglerA.MoorsA. C.MatsickJ. L.ValentineB. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141.
13.
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83.
14.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
15.
DienerE.GohmC. L.SuhE.OishiS. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436.
16.
DueP.ErikssonC.TorsheimT.PotrebnyT.VälimaaR.SuominenS.RasmussenM.CurrieC.DamgaardM. T. (2019). Trends in high life satisfaction among adolescents in five Nordic countries 2002–2014. Nordisk Välfärdsforskning| Nordic Welfare Research, 4(02), 54–66.
17.
DushC. M. K.AmatoP. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 607–627.
18.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41.
19.
FisherA. N.StinsonD. A.WoodJ. V.HolmesJ. G.CameronJ. J. (2021). Singlehood and attunement of self-esteem to friendships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 1326–1334.
20.
GalambosN. L.KrahnH. J.JohnsonM. D.LachmanM. E. (2020). The U shape of happiness across the life course: Expanding the discussion. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 898–912.
21.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116.
22.
Haring-HidoreM.StockW. A.OkunM. A.WitterR. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 947–953.
23.
HuininkJohannesBrüderlJosefNauckBernhardWalperSabineCastiglioniLauraFeldhausMichael. 2011. Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung - Journal of Family Research23: 77-101.
24.
InfurnaF. J.LutharS. S. (2016). Resilience to major life stressors is not as common as thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 175–194.
25.
InfurnaF. J.MayerA. (2019). Repeated bereavement takes its toll on subjective well-being. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), igz047.
26.
InfurnaF. J.WiestM.GerstorfD.RamN.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G.HeckhausenJ. (2017). Changes in life satisfaction when losing one’s spouse: Individual differences in anticipation, reaction, adaptation and longevity in the German Socio-economic Panel Study (SOEP). Ageing & Society, 37(5), 899–934.
27.
JohnsonM. P.LeslieL. (1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 34–43.
28.
LehmannV.TuinmanM. A.BraekenJ.VingerhoetsA. J.SandermanR.HagedoornM. (2015). Satisfaction with relationship status: Development of a new scale and the role in predicting well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 169–184.
29.
LucasR. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds: A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16(12), 945–950.
30.
LucasR. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.
31.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E. (2006). Do people really adapt to marriage?Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 405–426.
32.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E.GeorgellisY.DienerE. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–553.
33.
LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 323–331.
34.
LucasR. E.DyrenforthP. S. (2005). The myth of marital bliss?Psychological Inquiry, 16(2/3), 111–115.
35.
LuhmannM.BueckerS.KaiserT.BeermannM. (2020). Nothing going on? Exploring the role of missed events in changes in subjective well-being and the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 113-131.
36.
LuhmannM.EidM. (2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 363–381.
37.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 559–575.
38.
MikuckaM. (2016). The life satisfaction advantage of being married and gender specialization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 759–779.
39.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. (2017). Mplus version 8 user’s guide.
40.
NæssS.BlekesauneM.JakobssonN. (2015). Marital transitions and life satisfaction: Evidence from longitudinal data from Norway. Acta Sociologica, 58(1), 63–78.
41.
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2020). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034
42.
ParkY.ImpettE. A.MacDonaldG. (2021). Singles’ sexual satisfaction is associated with more satisfaction with singlehood and less interest in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 741–752.
43.
PavotW.DienerE. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The journal of positive psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
44.
PeppingC. A.MacDonaldG., & theory perspective on long-term singlDavis, P. J. (2018). Toward a psychology of singlehood: An attachment-ehood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 324-331.
45.
Perelli-HarrisB.HoherzS.LappegårdT.EvansA. (2019). Mind the “happiness” gap: The relationship between cohabitation, marriage, and subjective well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway. Demography, 56(4), 1219–1246.
46.
PinquartM.SchindlerI. (2007). Changes of life satisfaction in the transition to retirement: A latent-class approach. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 442–455.
47.
PrendaK. M.LachmanM. E. (2001). Planning for the future: A life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 16, 206–216.
48.
PurolM. F.KellerV. N.OhJ.ChopikW. J.LucasR. E. (in press). Loved and lost or never loved at all? Lifelong marital histories and their links with subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology.
49.
RobertsB. W.NickelL. (2017). A critical evaluation of the neosocioanalytic model of personality. In SpechtJ. (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 157–177). Elsevier.
50.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.
51.
SarkisianN.GerstelN. (2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 361–384.
52.
ScottP. W. (2021). Accounting for time-varying inter-individual differences in trajectories when assessing cross-lagged models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 365–375.
53.
ShinD. C.JohnsonD. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(1–4), 475–492.
54.
SoonsJ. P.LiefbroerA. C.KalmijnM. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1254–1270.
55.
StutzerA.FreyB. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married?The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347.
56.
TayL.DienerE. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354–365.
57.
TimonenV.DoyleM. (2014). Life-long singlehood: Intersections of the past and the present. Ageing & Society, 34(10), 1749-1770.
58.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK.PowersD. A.ChenM. D.CampbellA. M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 84(1), 493-511.
59.
VerbakelE. (2012). Subjective well-being by partnership status and its dependence on the normative climate. European Journal of Population/Revue Europeenne de Demographie, 28(2), 205–232.
60.
WhelanD. C.ZelenskiJ. M. (2012). Experimental evidence that positive moods cause sociability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 430–437.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
