Experimental research and real-world events demonstrate a puzzling phenomenon—anxiety, which primarily inspires caution, sometimes precedes bouts of risk-taking. We conducted three studies to test whether this phenomenon is due to the regulation of anxiety via reactive approach motivation (RAM), which leaves people less sensitive to negative outcomes and thus more likely to take risks. In Study 1 (N = 231), an achievement anxiety threat caused increased risk-taking on the Behavioral Analogue Risk Task (BART) among trait approach-motivated participants. Using electroencephalogram in Study 2 (N = 97), an economic anxiety threat increased behavioral inhibition system-specific theta activity, a neural correlate of anxiety, which was associated with an increase in risk-taking on the BART among trait approach-motivated participants. In a preregistered Study 3 (N = 432), we replicated the findings of Study 1. These results offer preliminary support for the reactive risk-taking hypothesis.
AbersonC. L. (2019). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Taylor & Francis Group.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
3.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324
4.
BishopS. J.DuncanJ.LawrenceA. D. (2004). State anxiety modulation of the amygdala response to unattended threat-related stimuli. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10364–10368. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2550-04.2004
5.
BowerG. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgment. In ForgasJ. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 31–54). Pergamon Press.
6.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965
7.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333.
8.
CavanaghJ. F.ShackmanA. J. (2015). Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 109(1–3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.003
CorrP. J. (2002). J.A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00170-2
12.
CorrP. J. (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge University Press.
13.
CreswellJ. D.WelchW. T.TaylorS. E.ShermanD. K.GruenewaldT. L.MannT. (2005). Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychological Science, 16(11), 846–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x
14.
DemareeH. A.DeDonnoM. A.BurnsK. J.FeldmanP.EverhartD. E. (2009). Trait dominance predicts risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.013
15.
DerryberryD.ReedM. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.225
16.
DulaC. S.AdamsC. L.MiesnerM. T.LeonardR. L. (2010). Examining relationships between anxiety and dangerous driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 2050–2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.016
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1488
19.
GambettiE.GiusbertiF. (2012). The effect of anger and anxiety traits on investment decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(6), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.07.001
GasperK.CloreG. L. (1998). The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1350–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1350
22.
GianottiL. R. R.KnochD.FaberP. L.LehmannD.Pascual-MarquiR. D.DieziC.. . . FehrE. (2009). Tonic activity level in the right prefrontal cortex predicts individuals’ risk taking. Psychological Science, 20, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02260.x
23.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. BJr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
24.
GrattonG.ColesM. G.DonchinE. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
25.
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
Harmon-JonesC.BastianB.Harmon-JonesE. (2016). Detecting transient emotional responses with improved self-report measures and instructions. Emotion, 16(7), 1086–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000216
28.
Harmon-JonesE.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesC. (2009). Action-based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 119–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00403-6
29.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
30.
HayesJ.WardC. L.McGregorI. (2016). Why bother? Death, failure, and fatalistic withdrawal from life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000039
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
33.
HirshJ. B.MarR. A.PetersonJ. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767
34.
HockeyG. R. J.John MauleA.CloughP. J.BdzolaL. (2000). Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. Cognition & Emotion, 14(6), 823–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930050156654
35.
HuntM. K.HopkoD. R.BareR.LejuezC. W.RobinsonE. V. (2005). Construct validity of the balloon analog risk task (BART) associations with psychopathy and impulsivity. Assessment, 12(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105278740
36.
JanaS.KummerT.SchmidtM. (2021, June25). The effects of approach/avoidance motivation and gain/loss-framing on the processing of information cues by non-professional investors. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3664856
37.
JohnsonE. J.TverskyA. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20
38.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.. . . QuirinM. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219–286). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4
39.
JormA. F.ChristensenH.HendersonA. S.JacombP. A.KortenA. E.RodgersB. (1998). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3
40.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
41.
KashdanT. B.CollinsR. L.ElhaiJ. D. (2006). Social anxiety and positive outcome expectancies on risk-taking behaviors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9017-x
42.
KimD. Y.LeeJ. H. (2011). Effects of the BAS and BIS on decision-making in a gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1131–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.041
43.
KnochD.GianottiL. R. R.Pascual-LeoneA.TreyerV.RegardM.HohmannM.BruggerP. (2006). Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6469–6472. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0804-06.2006
44.
KuhlJ. (1994). A theory of action and state orientations. Volition and Personality: Action versus State Orientation, 9–46.
LauriolaM.RussoP. M.LucidiF.ViolaniC.LevinI. P. (2005). The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.020
47.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.. . . BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
48.
LeotaJ.NashK. (2021). Incidental anxiety caused by economic threat heightens white noise P3 amplitude [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Psychology, University of Alberta.
49.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime. com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
52.
LloydJ.DollH.HawtonK.DuttonW. H.GeddesJ. R.GoodwinG. M.RogersR. D. (2010). How psychological symptoms relate to different motivations for gambling: An online study of internet gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.038
ManerJ. K.GerendM. A. (2007). Motivationally selective risk judgments: Do fear and curiosity boost the boons or the banes?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.08.002
55.
ManerJ. K.RicheyJ. A.CromerK.MallottM.LejuezC. W.JoinerT. E.SchmidtN. B. (2007). Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.016
56.
McGregorI.GailliotM. T.VasquezN. A.NashK. A. (2007). Ideological and personal zeal reactions to threat among people with high self-esteem: Motivated promotion focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1587–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207306280
57.
McGregorI.HajiR.NashK. A.TeperR. (2008). Religious zeal and the uncertain self. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802209251
58.
McGregorI.NashK. A.InzlichtM. (2009). Threat, high self-esteem, and reactive approach-motivation: Electroencephalographic evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1003–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.011
59.
McGregorI.NashK. A.MannN.PhillsC. E. (2010a). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019701
60.
McGregorI.NashK. A.PrenticeM. (2010b). Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019702
61.
McNaughtonN.CorrP. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
62.
McNaughtonN.DeYoungC. G.CorrP. J. (2016). Approach/avoidance. In AbsherJ. R.CloutierJ. (Eds.), Neuroimaging personality, social cognition, and character (pp. 25–49). Academic Press.
63.
McNaughtonN.KocsisB.HajosM. (2007). Elicited hippocampal theta rhythm: A screen for anxiolytic and procognitive drugs through changes in hippocampal function?Behavioural Pharmacology, 18(5–6), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282ee82e3
64.
McNaughtonN.SwartC.NeoP.BatesV.GlueP. (2013). Anti-anxiety drugs reduce conflict-specific “theta”—A possible human anxiety-specific biomarker. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.057
65.
MitteK. (2007). Anxiety and risky decision-making: The role of subjective probability and subjective costs of negative events. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.028
NashK.McGregorI.PrenticeM. (2011). Threat and defense as goal regulation: From implicit goal conflict to anxious uncertainty, reactive approach motivation, and ideological extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025944
70.
NeoP. S. H.McNaughtonN. (2011). Frontal theta power linked to neuroticism and avoidance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0038-x
71.
NeoP. S. H.ThurlowJ. K.McNaughtonN. (2011). Stopping, goal-conflict, trait anxiety and frontal rhythmic power in the stop-signal task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0046-x
72.
NicholsonN.SoaneE.Fenton-O’CreevyM.WillmanP. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856
73.
PaganoM. S.SedunovJ.VelthuisR. (2021). How did retail investors respond to the COVID-19 pandemic? The effect of Robinhood brokerage customers on market quality. Finance Research Letters, 43, Article 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101946
74.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience. The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.
75.
ParkL. E. (2010). Responses to self-threat: Linking self and relational constructs with approach and avoidance motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(3), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00247.x
76.
SantessoD. L.SegalowitzS. J. (2009). The error-related negativity is related to risk taking and empathy in young men. Psychophysiology, 46, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00714.x
77.
SchumannK.McGregorI.NashK. A.RossM. (2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036739
78.
ShackmanA. J.McMenaminB. W.MaxwellJ. S.GreischarL. L.DavidsonR. J. (2009). Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activity and behavioral inhibition. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1500–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02476.x
79.
ShillerR. (2005). Irrational exuberance (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
80.
SmillieL. D.JacksonC. J. (2005). The appetitive motivation scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.013
81.
SmithG.LevereM.KurtzmanR. (2009). Poker player behavior after big wins and big losses. Management Science, 55, 1547–1555. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1044
82.
ThalerR. H.JohnsonE. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
83.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
ZhangD.GuR. (2018). Behavioral preference in sequential decision-making and its association with anxiety. Human Brain Mapping, 39(6), 2482–2499. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24016
86.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00124
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
