We examined how the number of groups in a categorization task influences how White Americans categorize ambiguous faces. We investigated the strength of identity-driven ingroup overexclusion–wherein highly identified perceivers overexclude ambiguous members from the ingroup–proposing that, compared with dichotomous tasks (with only the ingroup and one outgroup), tasks with more outgroups attenuate identity-driven ingroup overexclusion (a dilution effect). Fourteen studies (n = 4,001) measured White Americans’ racial identification and their categorizations of ambiguous faces and manipulated the categorization task to have two groups, three groups, or an unspecified number of groups (open-ended). In all three conditions, participants overexcluded faces from the White category on average. There was limited support for the dilution effect: identity-driven ingroup overexclusion was absent in the three-group task and only weakly supported in the open-ended task. The presence of multiple outgroups may dampen the impact of racial identity on race perceptions among White Americans.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In SrullT. K.WyerR. S., Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1–36). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BrewerM. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In AshmoreR.JussimL.WilderD. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). Oxford University Press.
5.
BrunerJ. S.GoodnowJ. J.AustinG. A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley.
6.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1512
7.
ChenJ. M.de Paula CoutoM. C. P.SaccoA. M.DunhamY. (2018). To be or not to be (Black or Multiracial or White) cultural variation in racial boundaries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(7), 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617725149
8.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.005
9.
ChenJ. M.NormanJ. B.NamY. (2021). Broadening the stimulus set: Introducing the American multiracial faces database. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 371–389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01447-8
10.
ChenJ. M.PaukerK.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2018). Black + white = not white: A minority bias in categorizations of Black-White multiracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 43–54.
11.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266.
12.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100.
13.
DavisF. J. (1991). Who is black? One nation’s definition. Pennsylvania State University Press.
14.
DeBruineL. M.BarrD. J. (2021). Understanding mixed-effects models through data simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–15.
15.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.
16.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2
17.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327
18.
FreemanJ. B.PaukerK.SanchezD. T. (2016). A perceptual pathway to bias: Interracial exposure reduces abrupt shifts in real-time race perception that predict mixed-race bias. Psychological Science, 27(4), 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615627418
19.
GaitherS. E.ChenJ. M.PaukerK.SommersS. R. (2018). At face value: Psychological outcomes differ for real vs. computer-generated multiracial faces. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(5), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1538929
20.
GaitherS. E.PaukerK.SlepianM. L.SommersS. R. (2016). Social belonging motivates categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Social Cognition, 34(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.2.97
21.
GaitherS. E.ToosiN. R.BabbittL. G.SommersS. R. (2019). Exposure to biracial faces reduces colorblindness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218778012
22.
GorenM. J.PlautV. C. (2012). Identity form matters: White racial identity and attitudes toward diversity. Self and Identity, 11, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.556804
23.
HartstoneM.AugoustinosM. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 179–193.
24.
HoA. K.KteilyN. S.ChenJ. M. (2017). “You’re one of us”: Black Americans’ use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(5), 753–768.
25.
HoA. K.KteilyN. S.ChenJ. M. (2020). Introducing the sociopolitical motive × intergroup threat model to understand how monoracial perceivers’ sociopolitical motives influence their categorization of multiracial people. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320917051
26.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.CuddyA. J. C.BanajiM. R. (2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black-White multiracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 940–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.010
27.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002156
28.
HutterR. R.CrispR. J.HumphreysG. W.WatersG. M.MoffittG. (2009). The dynamics of category conjunctions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(5), 673–686.
29.
IoannidisJ. P. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645–654.
30.
JaegerB.EvansA. M.StelM.van BeestI. (2019). Explaining the persistent influence of facial cues in social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000591
31.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69.
32.
KnowlesE. D.PengK. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223
33.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111(25), 9079–9084. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404448111
34.
KroschA. R.BernstenL.AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.Van BavelJ. J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.009
35.
LambertP. C.SuttonA. J.AbramsK. R.JonesD. R. (2002). A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(1), 86–94.
36.
LaneA.LuminetO.NaveG.MikolajczakM. (2016). Is there a publication bias in behavioural intranasal oxytocin research on humans? Opening the file drawer of one laboratory. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 28(4).
37.
LeyensJ. P.YzerbytV. Y. (1992). The in-group overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(6), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220604
38.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (2014). Recalibrating gender perception: Face aftereffects and the perceptual underpinnings of gender-related biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1259–1276.
39.
LoveB. C. (2017). Concepts, meaning, and conceptual relationships. In ChipmanS. E. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive science (pp. 137–150). Oxford University Press.
40.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
41.
McDonaldM. M.NavarreteC. D.SidaniusJ. (2011). Developing a theory of gendered prejudice: An evolutionary and social dominance perspective. In McDonaldM. M.NavarreteC. D.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations (pp. 192–223). Psychology Press.
42.
NamY.ChenJ. M. (2021). Are you one of us: Investigating cultural differences in determining group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(7), 1113–1137.
43.
NicolasG.SkinnerA. L.DickterC. L. (2019). Other than the sum: Hispanic and middle eastern categorizations of black-white mixed-race faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618769591
NosofskyR. M.PalmeriT. J.McKinleyS. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101(1), 53–79.
46.
OakesP. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 117–141). Blackwell.
47.
PaukerK.MeyersC.SanchezD. T.GaitherS. E.YoungD. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: Identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), Article e12392. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12392
48.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19(10), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02185.x
49.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Multiracial in America: Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers. Washington, D.C.
50.
PosnerM. I.KeeleS. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 241–248.
51.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). SAGE.
52.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
53.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
54.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
55.
SanchezD. T.YoungD. M.PaukerK. (2015). Exposure to racial ambiguity influences lay theories of race. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 382–390.
56.
SherifM. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. Routledge Kegan Paul.
57.
SidaniusJ.HudsonS. T. J.DavisG.BerghR. (2018). The theory of gendered prejudice: A social dominance and intersectionalist perspective. In Mintz & Terris (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral political science (pp. 1–35). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634131.013.11
58.
SkinnerA. L.NicolasG. (2015). Looking Black or looking back? Using phenotype and ancestry to make racial categorizations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 55–63.
59.
SpielmanD. A. (2000). Young children, minimal groups, and dichotomous categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1433–1441.
60.
StewartL. A.ParmarM. K. (1993). Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: Is there a difference?The Lancet, 341(8842), 418–422.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
65.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, 2(1), 399–417.
66.
VosgerauJ.SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2019). 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000663
67.
WiltonL.SanchezD. T.GiamoL. (2014). Seeing similarity or distance? Racial identification moderates intergroup perception after biracial exposure. Social Psychology, 45(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000168
68.
YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.PaukerK.GaitherS. E. (2021). A meta-analytic review of hypodescent patterns in categorizing multiracial and racially ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220941321
69.
YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ.-P.BellourF. (1995). The in-group overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decisions about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250102
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
