Detecting dominant individuals within crowds is crucial for human survival, prompting investigation into the tension between quick detection and careful recognition of dominant faces. In our visual search tasks, participants located a target face with a specific identity, with dominance being task-irrelevant. Targets varied in dominance (high or low), and the dominance congruency between targets and distractors was manipulated. Results showed more efficient search when targets differed from distractors by dominance, suggesting leverage of latent dominance contrast. Surprisingly, searching for high-dominance faces exhibited lower efficiency. Experiment 2 replicated these findings and incorporated eye-tracking, revealing longer distractor inspection, more revisits to target faces, and prolonged identification times for high-dominance face searches. Experiment 3 showed search inefficiency even with only dominant faces’ eye regions, underscoring the role of local features. Our findings offer a nuanced perspective on how perceived dominance influences cognition and behavior, challenging the assumed ease of dominance detection.
AbirY.SklarA. Y.DotschR.TodorovA.HassinR. R. (2018). The determinants of consciousness of human faces. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0266-3
2.
AungT.HillA. K.HlayJ. K.HessC.HessM.JohnsonJ.DollL.CarlsonS. M.MagdinecC.G-SantoyoI.WalkerR. S.BaileyD.ArnockyS.KambleS.VardyT.KyritsisT.AtkinsonQ.JonesB.BurnsJ.. . . PutsD. (2024). Effects of voice pitch on social perceptions vary with relational mobility and homicide rate. Psychological Science, 35(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231222288
3.
BeckerD. V.AndersonU. S.MortensenC. R.NeufeldS. L.NeelR. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024060
4.
BeckerD. V.RheemH. (2020). Searching for a face in the crowd: Pitfalls and unexplored possibilities. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(2), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-01975-7
BernsteinI. S. (1976). Dominance, aggression and reproduction in primate societies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 60(2), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(76)90072-2
7.
BjornsdottirR. T.HenselL. B.ZhanJ.GarrodO. G. B.SchynsP. G.JackR. E. (2024). Social class perception is driven by stereotype-related facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(3), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001519
8.
BoyerP.BergstromB. (2011). Threat-detection in child development: An evolutionary perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.010
9.
BoyerP.LienardP. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences29(6), 595–613.
10.
BrownM.SaccoD. F.BarbaroN.DreaK. M. (2022). Contextual factors that heighten interest in coalitional alliances with men possessing formidable facial structures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(4), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.05.001
11.
BushJ. M.QuinnM. M.BalreiraE. C.JohnsonM. A. (2016). How do lizards determine dominance? Applying ranking algorithms to animal social behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 118, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.026
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x
14.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
15.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HoS.HenrichJ. (2016). Listen, follow me: Dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000166
16.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K. (2008). High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 147470490800600. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600209
17.
EnrightE. A.GweonH.SommervilleJ. A. (2017). “To the victor go the spoils”: Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures. Cognition, 164, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.008
18.
FangW.GaluscaC. I.WangZ.SunY.-H. P.PascalisO.XiaoN. G. (2023). Facial dominance augments perceived proximity: Evidence from a visual illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(5), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001102
19.
FirestoneC.SchollB. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965
FruhenL. S.WatkinsC. D.JonesB. C. (2015). Perceptions of facial dominance, trustworthiness and attractiveness predict managerial pay awards in experimental tasks. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.001
22.
GachombaM. J. M.Esteve-AgrazJ.CarefK.MarotoA. S.Bortolozzo-GleichM. H.LaplagneD. A.MárquezC. (2022). Multimodal cues displayed by submissive rats promote prosocial choices by dominants. Current Biology, 32(15), 3288–3301.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.026
23.
GillD.GarrodO. G. B.JackR. E.SchynsP. G. (2014). Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614522274
GrosenickL.ClementT. S.FernaldR. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445(7126), 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05511
26.
GuoL.CourtneyS. M.FischerJ. (2020). Knowledge of objects’ physical properties implicitly guides attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2332–2343. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000776
27.
HanC.KandrikM.HahnA. C.FisherC. I.FeinbergD. R.HolzleitnerI. J.DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C. (2017). Interrelationships among men’s threat potential, facial dominance, and vocal dominance. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917697332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697332
28.
HaselhuhnM. P.WongE. M. (2012). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1728), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1193
29.
HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
30.
HaseltonM. G.NettleD. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
31.
HobsonE. A.MønsterD.DeDeoS. (2021). Aggression heuristics underlie animal dominance hierarchies and provide evidence of group-level social information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(10), e2022912118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022912118
32.
HollandE.WolfE. B.LooserC.CuddyA. (2017). Visual attention to powerful postures: People avert their gaze from nonverbal dominance displays. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.001
33.
HorstmannG.BeckerS. I. (2020). More efficient visual search for happy faces may not indicate guidance, but rather faster distractor rejection: Evidence from eye movements and fixations. Emotion, 20(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000536
34.
HorstmannG.HerwigA.BeckerS. I. (2016). Distractor dwelling, skipping, and revisiting determine target absent performance in difficult visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01152
JackR. E.SchynsP. G. (2015). The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Current Biology, 25(14), R621–R634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.052
JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.FlakeJ. K.LiuzzaM. T.AntfolkJ.ArinzeN. C.NdukaiheI. L. G.BloxsomN. G.LewisS. C.ForoniF.WillisM. L.CubillasC. P.VadilloM. A.TurieganoE.GileadM.SimchonA.SaribayS. A.OwsleyN. C.JangC.. . . ColesN. A. (2021). To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?Nature Human Behaviour, 5(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2
39.
JuniM. Z.EcksteinM. P. (2017). The wisdom of crowds for visual search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(21), E4306–E4315. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610732114
40.
KappelJ. M.FörsterD.SlangewalK.ShainerI.SvaraF.DonovanJ. C.ShermanS.JanuszewskiM.BaierH.LarschJ. (2022). Visual recognition of social signals by a tectothalamic neural circuit. Nature, 608(7921), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04925-5
41.
KeatingC. F. (1985). Human dominance signals: The primate in us. In EllysonS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 89–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_5
42.
KlassK. (2016). Primate dominance hierarchies. In ShackelfordT. K.Weekes-ShackelfordV. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2536-1
43.
Kleider-OffuttH.MeachamA. M.Branum-MartinL.CapodannoM. (2021). What’s in a face? The role of facial features in ratings of dominance, threat, and stereotypicality. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00319-9
44.
KleinS. A. W.ShermanJ. W. (2024). Measuring the impact of multiple social cues to advance theory in person perception research. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000503
45.
Lancry-DayanO. C.GamerM.PertzovY. (2021). Search for the unknown: Guidance of visual search in the absence of an active template. Psychological Science, 32(9), 1404–1415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621996660
46.
LandwehrJ. R.WänkeM. (2023). Face-to-face: Three facial features that may turn the scale in close electoral races. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 108, 104488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104488
47.
LevinD. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
48.
LinJ. Y.MurrayS. O.BoyntonG. M. (2009). Capture of attention to threatening stimuli without perceptual awareness. Current Biology, 19(13), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.021
49.
LongB.StörmerV. S.AlvarezG. A. (2017). Mid-level perceptual features contain early cues to animacy. Journal of Vision, 17(6): 20, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.6.20
50.
MascaroO.CsibraG. (2012). Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(18), 6862–6867. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113194109
51.
MascaroO.CsibraG. (2014). Human infants’ learning of social structures: The case of dominance hierarchy. Psychological Science, 25(1), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613500509
52.
MazurA.MazurJ.KeatingC. (1984). Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadets’ physical features. American Journal of Sociology, 90(1), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/228050
53.
MitchellG.MapleT. L. (1985). Dominance in nonhuman primates. In EllysonS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 49–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_3
54.
MuellerU.MazurA. (1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74(3), 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.823
55.
NeelR.LassetterB. (2019). The stigma of perceived irrelevance: An affordance-management theory of interpersonal invisibility. Psychological Review, 126(5), 634–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000143
56.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011
NeubergS. L.WilliamsK. E. G.SngO.PickC. M.NeelR.KremsJ. A.PirlottA. G. (2020). Toward capturing the functional and nuanced nature of social stereotypes: An affordance management approach. In GawronskiB. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 62, pp. 245–304). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.004
59.
OhD.ShafirE.TodorovA. (2020). Economic status cues from clothes affect perceived competence from faces. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0782-4
ÖhmanA.FlyktA.EstevesF. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
62.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
PinkhamA. E.GriffinM.BaronR.SassonN. J.GurR. C. (2010). The face in the crowd effect: Anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Emotion, 10(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017387
67.
PiredduS.BongiornoR.RyanM. K.RubiniM.MenegattiM. (2022). The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 644–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12501
QuC.LigneulR.Van der HenstJ.-B.DreherJ.-C. (2017). An integrative interdisciplinary perspective on social dominance hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.004
70.
RatcliffN. J.HugenbergK.ShriverE. R.BernsteinM. J. (2011). The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407210
71.
RobertsA.PalermoR.VisserT. A. W. (2019a). Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 2473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0
72.
RobertsA.PalermoR.VisserT. A. W. (2019b). Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 17962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8
SellA.CosmidesL.ToobyJ.SznycerD.Von RuedenC.GurvenM. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1177
75.
SellA.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106
76.
SteinT.AwadD.GayetS.PeelenM. V. (2018). Unconscious processing of facial dominance: The role of low-level factors in access to awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), e1–e13. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000521
77.
ThomsenL.FrankenhuisW. E.Ingold-SmithM.CareyS. (2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331(6016), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199198
78.
TodorovA.DotschR.PorterJ. M.OosterhofN. N.FalvelloV. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13(4), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032335
79.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
80.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.EngellA. D.OosterhofN. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
81.
ToscanoH.SchubertT. W.SellA. N. (2014). Judgments of dominance from the face track physical strength. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 147470491401200. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200101
82.
WangA.QuinnB. P. A.GoftonH.AndrewsT. J. (2024). No evidence for an other-race effect in dominance and trustworthy judgements from faces. Perception, 53(9), 632–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241258204
83.
WangH.HahnA. C.DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C. (2016). The motivational salience of faces is related to both their valence and dominance. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0161114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161114
84.
WenZ.RaioC. M.Pace-SchottE. F.LazarS. W.LeDouxJ. E.PhelpsE. A.MiladM. R. (2022). Temporally and anatomically specific contributions of the human amygdala to threat and safety learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(26), e2204066119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204066119
WilsonJ. P. (2018). Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007
88.
WitkowerZ.TracyJ. L.ChengJ. T.HenrichJ. (2020). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000181
WongE. M.OrmistonM. E.HaselhuhnM. P. (2011). A face only an investor could love: CEOs’ facial structure predicts their firms’ financial performance. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1478–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418838
ZebrowitzL. A.FellousJ.-M.MignaultA.AndreolettiC. (2003). Trait impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively significant facial qualities: Evidence from connectionist modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(3), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0703_01
93.
ZebrowitzL. A.KikuchiM.FellousJ. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 175–189.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
