Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It has been 13 years since the last comprehensive review of the performance management (PM) literature, and a lot has changed in both research and practice in that time. The current review updates (identifying new research directions post 2004) and extends this previous work by creating a systems-based taxonomy and conceptual model of PM. We then use this model to interpret and integrate the extensive work in this area and to identify fruitful and systems-based directions for future PM work. As input to our conclusions, we reviewed the last 36-plus years of PM research (1980–2017) and conducted a comprehensive coding of all empirical PM articles. We offer several specific directions for future PM research, with the ultimate goal of improving PM in practice.

Keywords

performance management performance appraisal performance evaluation systems theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abu-Doleh

Weir

2007. Dimensions of performance appraisal systems in Jordanian private and public organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 75-84.

Adler

Campion

Colquitt

Grubb

Murphy

Ollander-Krane

Pulakos

E. D.

2016. Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9: 219-252.

Aguinis

2013. Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Akuratiyagamage

V. M.

2005. Identification of management development needs: A comparison across companies of different ownership—foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 1512-1528.

Alder

G. S.

Ambrose

M. L.

2005. An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 161-177.

Anderson

J. R.

Johnson

N. B.

2005. On the relationship between work contexts, mandates and compliance behaviours of supervisors. Journal of Change Management, 5: 381-390.

Anseel

Lievens

Schollaert

2009. Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110: 23-35.

Ayers

R. S.

2013. Building goal alignment in federal agencies’ performance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Management, 42: 495-520.

Bande Vilela

Varela González

J. A.

Fernández Ferrín

Luisa del Río Araújo

2007. Impression management tactics and affective context: Influence on sales performance appraisal. European Journal of Marketing, 41: 624-639.

10.

Becker

Antuar

Everett

2011. Implementing an employee performance management system in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21: 255-271.

11.

Bernardin

H. J.

Villanova

2005. Research streams in rater self-efficacy. Group & Organization Management, 30: 61-88.

12.

Bhave

D. P.

2014. The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personnel Psychology, 67: 605-635.

13.

Bipp

Kleingeld

2011. Goal-setting in practice: The effects of personality and perceptions of the goal-setting process on job satisfaction and goal commitment. Personnel Review, 40: 306-323.

14.

Blume

B. D.

Rubin

R. S.

Baldwin

T. T.

2013. Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system? Human Resource Management Journal, 23: 360-378.

15.

Boulding

K. E.

1956. General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2: 197-208.

16.

Bretz

R. D.

Milkovich

G. T.

Read

1992. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18: 321-352.

17.

Brown

T. C.

Warren

A. M.

2011. Performance management in unionized settings. Human Resource Management Review, 21: 96-106.

18.

Buckingham

Goodall

2015. Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93(4): 40-50.

19.

Cabrera

D. D.

Fernaud

E. H.

Díaz

R. I.

Rodríguez

N. D.

Vilela

L. D.

Sánchez

C. R.

2014. Factores relevantes para aumentar la precisión, la viabilidad y el éxito de los sistemas de evaluación del desempeño laboral [Relevant factors to increase the accuracy, feasibility and success of job performance evaluation systems]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35: 115-121.

20.

Cascio

W. F.

2006. 10 global performance management systems. In Stahl

G. K.

Björkman

(Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management: 176-196. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

21.

Cavanaugh

Levy

P. E.

Schleicher

D. J.

Anseel

Colquitt

Hunt

2013. Performance management researchers and practitioners…You need to hear this, 2.0! Panel discussion at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Houston, TX.

22.

Clarke

Harcourt

Flynn

2012. Clinical governance, performance appraisal and interactional and procedural fairness at a New Zealand public hospital. Journal of Business Ethics, 117: 667-678.

23.

Claus

Briscoe

2009. Employee performance management across borders: A review of relevant academic literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 175-196.

24.

Cleveland

J. N.

Murphy

K. R.

Williams

R. E.

1989. Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 130-135.

25.

Collins-Camargo

Chuang

McBeath

Bunger

A. C.

2014. Private child welfare agency managers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of different performance management strategies. Children and Youth Services Review, 38: 133-141.

26.

Colquitt

A. L.

2017. Next generation performance management: The triumph of science over myth and superstition. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

27.

Colquitt

J. A.

Scott

B. A.

Rodell

J. B.

Long

D. M.

Zapata

C. P.

Conlon

D. E.

Wesson

M. J.

2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 199-236.

28.

Culbertson

S. S.

Henning

J. B.

Payne

S. C.

2013. Performance appraisal satisfaction: The role of feedback and goal orientation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12: 189-195.

29.

Culig

K. M.

Dickinson

A. M.

Lindstrom-Hazel

Austin

2008. Combining workstation design and performance management to increase ergonomically correct computer typing postures. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28: 146-175.

30.

Curtis

A. B.

Harvey

R. D.

Ravden

2005. Sources of political distortions in performance appraisals: Appraisal purpose and rater accountability. Group & Organization Management, 30: 42-60.

31.

David

E. M.

2013. Examining the role of narrative performance appraisal comments on performance. Human Performance, 26: 430-450.

32.

Decramer

Smolders

Vanderstraeten

2013. Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: Relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 352-371.

33.

den Hartog

D. N.

Boselie

Paauwe

2004. Performance management: A model and research agenda. Applied Psychology, 53: 556-569.

34.

DeNisi

A. S.

Peters

L. H.

1996. Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 717-737.

35.

DeNisi

A. S.

Pritchard

R. D.

2006. Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2: 253-277.

36.

DeNisi

A. S.

Smith

C. E.

2014. Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 8: 127-179.

37.

Dewberry

Davies-Muir

Newell

2013. Impact and causes of rater severity/leniency in appraisals without postevaluation communication between raters and ratees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21: 286-293.

38.

Dhiman

Maheshwari

S. K.

2013. Performance appraisal politics from appraisee perspective: A study of antecedents in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 1202-1235.

39.

Dusterhoff

Cunningham

J. B.

MacGregor

J. N.

2014. The effects of performance rating, leader-member exchange, perceived utility, and organizational justice on performance appraisal satisfaction: Applying a moral judgment perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 119: 265-273.

40.

Effron

Ort

2010. One page talent management: Eliminating complexity, adding value. Boston: Harvard Business School.

41.

Eichinger

R. W.

Lombardo

M. M.

Ulrich

Cannon

2004. 100 things you need to know: Best people practices for managers & HR. Minneapolis: Lominger.

42.

Elicker

J. D.

Levy

P. E.

Hall

R. J.

2006. The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32: 531-551.

43.

Ellis

D. R.

2012. Exploring cultural dimensions as predictors of performance management preferences: The case of self-initiating expatriate New Zealanders in Belgium. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 2087-2107.

44.

Erdemli

Sümer

H. C.

Bilgiç

2007. A comparison of written feedback and written plus verbal feedback methods in performance management. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22(60): 71-85.

45.

Erez

Schilpzand

Leavitt

Woolum

A. H.

Judge

T. A.

2015. Inherently relational: Interactions between peers’ and individuals’ personalities impact reward giving and appraisal of individual performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1761-1784.

46.

Evans

E. M.

McShane

S. L.

1988. Employee perceptions of performance appraisal fairness in two organizations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 20: 177-191.

47.

Farndale

Hope-Hailey

Kelliher

2011. High commitment performance management: The roles of justice and trust. Personnel Review, 40: 5-23.

48.

Fee

McGrath-Champ

Yang

2011. Expatriate performance management and firm internationalization: Australian multinationals in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49: 365-384.

49.

Ferguson

A. J.

Ormiston

M. E.

Moon

2010. From approach to inhibition: The influence of power on responses to poor performers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 305-320.

50.

Giumetti

G. W.

Schroeder

A. N.

Switzer

I. S.

2015. Forced distribution rating systems: When does “rank and yank” lead to adverse impact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 180-193.

51.

Godin

2009. National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34: 476-501.

52.

Goerke

Möller

Schulz-Hardt

Napiersky

Frey

2004. “It’s not my fault—but only I can change it”: Counterfactual and prefactual thoughts of managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 279-292.

53.

Goffin

R. D.

Jelley

R. B.

Powell

D. M.

Johnston

N. G.

2009. Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method. Human Resource Management, 48: 251-268.

54.

Goh

F. A.

Anderson

M. C.

2007. Driving business value from performance management at Caterpillar. Organization Development Journal, 25: P219-P226.

55.

Gorman

C. A.

Rentsch

J. R.

2009. Evaluating frame-of-reference rater training effectiveness using performance schema accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1336-1344.

56.

Grant

A. M.

Parker

Collins

2009. Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62: 31-55.

57.

Gregory

J. B.

Levy

P. E.

2010. Employee coaching relationships: Enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3: 109-123.

58.

Gregory

J. B.

Levy

P. E.

2011. It’s not me, it’s you: A multilevel examination of variables that impact employee coaching relationships. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63: 67-88.

59.

Gregory

J. B.

Levy

P. E.

2012. Employee feedback orientation: Implications for effective coaching relationships. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5: 86-99.

60.

Gregory

J. B.

Levy

P. E.

Jeffers

2008. Development of a model of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60: 42-56.

61.

Haines

V. Y.

St-Onge

2012. Performance management effectiveness: Practices or context? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 1158-1175.

62.

Hebert

B. G.

Vorauer

J. D.

2003. Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges? Computers in Human Behavior, 19: 25-38.

63.

Hernandez

Avery

D. R.

Tonidandel

Hebl

M. R.

Smith

A. N.

McKay

P. F.

2016. The role of proximal social contexts: Assessing stigma-by-association effects on leader appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 68-85.

64.

Heslin

P. A.

VandeWalle

2011. Performance appraisal procedural justice: The role of a manager’s implicit person theory. Journal of Management, 37: 1694-1718.

65.

Heslin

P. A.

VandeWalle

Latham

G. P.

2006. Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59: 871-902.

66.

Hofstetter

Harpaz

2015. Declared versus actual organizational culture as indicated by an organization’s performance appraisal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26: 445-466.

67.

Howard

A. E.

1995. The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

68.

Ilgen

D. R.

Barnes-Farrell

J. L.

McKellin

D. B.

1993. Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54: 321-368.

69.

Inderrieden

E. J.

Allen

R. E.

Keaveny

T. J.

2004. Managerial discretion in the use of self-ratings in an appraisal system: The antecedents and consequences. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16: 460-482.

70.

Jackson

1996. An individual differences approach to the halo-accuracy paradox. Personality and Individual Differences, 21: 947-957.

71.

Jawahar

I. M.

2005. Do raters consider the influence of situational factors on observed performance when evaluating performance? Evidence from three experiments. Group & Organization Management, 30: 6-41.

72.

Jiang

Wang

Zhao

2012. Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 4025-4047.

73.

Johns

in press. Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406

74.

Kacmar

K. M.

Wayne

S. J.

Wright

P. M.

2009. Subordinate reactions to the use of impression management tactics and feedback by the supervisor. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21: 498-517.

75.

Kamer

Annen

2010. The role of core self-evaluations in predicting performance appraisal reactions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69: 95-104.

76.

Kataoka

H. C.

Cole

N. D.

Flint

D. A.

2006. Due process model of procedural justice in performance appraisal: Promotion versus termination scenarios. Psychological Reports, 99: 819-832.

77.

Katz

Kahn

R. L.

1978. The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

78.

Kavanagh

Benson

Brown

2007. Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45: 132-150.

79.

Kaya

Koc

Topcu

2010. An exploratory analysis of the influence of human resource management activities and organizational climate on job satisfaction in Turkish banks. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21: 2031-2051.

80.

Kepes

Bennett

A. A.

McDaniel

M. A.

2014. Evidence-based management and the trustworthiness of our cumulative scientific knowledge: Implications for teaching, research, and practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13: 446-466.

81.

Kinicki

A. J.

Jacobson

K. J.

Peterson

S. J.

Prussia

G. E.

2013. Development and validation of the performance management behavior questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 66: 1-45.

82.

Kinicki

A. J.

Prussia

G. E.

B. J.

McKee-Ryan

F. M.

2004. A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 1057-1069.

83.

Klein

H. J.

Snell

S. A.

Wexley

K. N.

1987. Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 26: 267-280.

84.

Kleingeld

van Mierlo

Arends

2011. The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1289-1304.

85.

Kleingeld

van Tuijl

Algera

J. A.

2004. Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 831-851.

86.

Kluger

A. N.

DeNisi

1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254-284.

87.

Kooij

D. T. A. M.

Guest

D. E.

Clinton

Knight

Jansen

P. G. W.

Dikkers

J. S. E.

2013. How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23: 18-35.

88.

Krats

Brown

T. C.

2013. Unionised employee’s reactions to the introduction of a goal-based performance appraisal system. Human Resource Management Journal, 23: 396-412.

89.

Kulas

J. T.

Hannum

K. M.

2006. Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: Application of the Rasch rating scale model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8: 404-416.

90.

Kurtzberg

T. R.

Naquin

C. E.

Belkin

L. Y.

2005. Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98: 216-226.

91.

Kuvaas

2006. Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17: 504-522.

92.

Kuvaas

2007. Different relationships between perceptions of developmental performance appraisal and work performance. Personnel Review, 36: 378-397.

93.

Kuvaas

2011. The interactive role of performance appraisal reactions and regular feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26: 123-137.

94.

Landy

F. J.

Farr

J. L.

1980. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-107.

95.

Latham

G. P.

Budworth

Yanar

Whyte

2008. The influence of a manager’s own performance appraisal on the evaluation of others. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16: 220-228.

96.

Lawler

E. E.

2003. Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 32: 396-404.

97.

Lawler

E. E.

McDermott

2003. Current performance management practices: Examining the varying impacts. World at Work Journal, 12: 49-60.

98.

Lee

F. H.

Lee

T. Z.

W. Y.

2010. The relationship between human resource management practices, business strategy and firm performance: Evidence from steel industry in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21: 1351-1372.

99.

Levy

P. E.

Cavanaugh

Frantz

N. B.

Borden

L. A.

2015. The role of due process in performance appraisal: A 20 year retrospective. In Cropanzano

R. S.

Ambrose

M. L.

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace: 605-620. New York: Oxford University Press.

100.

Levy

P. E.

Tseng

S. T.

Rosen

C. C.

Lueke

S. B.

2017. Performance management: A marriage between practice and science: Just say “I do.” In Buckley

M. R.

Wheeler

A. R.

Halbesleben

J. R. B.

(Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 35: 155-213. Bingley, England: Emerald.

101.

Levy

P. E.

Williams

J. R.

2004. The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30: 881-905.

102.

Lievens

Conway

J. M.

De Corte

2008. The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81: 11-27.

103.

Linderbaum

B. A.

Levy

P. E.

2010. The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36: 1372-1405.

104.

Linna

Elovainio

Van den Bos

Kivimäki

Pentti

Vahtera

2012. Can usefulness of performance appraisal interviews change organizational justice perceptions? A 4-year longitudinal study among public sector employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 1360-1375.

105.

Liu

2011. Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior: An empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22: 981-997.

106.

Lyness

K. S.

Heilman

M. E.

2006. When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 777-785.

107.

Macan

Mehner

Havill

Meriac

J. P.

Roberts

Heft

2011. Two for the price of one: Assessment center training to focus on behaviors can transfer to performance appraisals. Human Performance, 24: 443-457.

108.

Mamatoglu

2008. Effects on organizational context (culture and climate) from implementing a 360-degree feedback system: The case of Arcelik. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 426-449.

109.

Martell

R. F.

Evans

D. P.

2005. Source-monitoring training: Toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 956-963.

110.

Medcof

J. W.

Song

L. J.

2013. Exploration, exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 2911-2926.

111.

Mento

A. J.

Steel

R. P.

Karren

R. J.

1987. A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 52-83.

112.

Mero

N. P.

Guidice

R. M.

Brownlee

A. L.

2007. Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33: 223-252.

113.

Miller

J. S.

2003. High tech and high performance: Managing appraisal in the information age. Journal of Labor Research, 24: 409-424.

114.

Mok

Cheng

C. Y.

Morris

M. W.

2010. Matching versus mismatching cultural norms in performance appraisal: Effects of the cultural setting and bicultural identity integration. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10: 17-35.

115.

Murphy

K. R.

2008. Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 148-160.

116.

Murphy

K. R.

Cleveland

J. N.

1991. Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

117.

Nadler

D. A.

Tushman

M. L.

1980. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2): 35-51.

118.

Nadler

D. A.

Tushman

M. L.

1984. A congruence model for diagnosing organizational behavior. In Kolb

D. A.

Rubin

J. M.

McIntyre

J. M.

(Eds.), Organizational psychology: Reading on human behavior in organizations: 587-603. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

119.

Nayyab

H. H.

Hamid

Naseer

Iqbal

2011. The impact of HRM practices on the organizational performance: The study of banking sector in Okara, Punjab (Pakistan). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3: 661-672.

120.

Neubert

M. J.

1998. The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 11: 321-335.

121.

K. Y.

Koh

Ang

Kennedy

J. C.

Chan

K. Y.

2011. Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1033-1044.

122.

Nishii

L. H.

Wright

2008. Variability at multiple levels of analysis: Implications for strategic human resource management. In Smith

D. B.

(Ed.), The people make the place: 225-248. New York: Erlbaum.

123.

Norris-Watts

Levy

P. E.

2004. The mediating role of affective commitment in the relation of the feedback environment to work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65: 351-365.

124.

Northcraft

G. B.

Schmidt

A. M.

Ashford

S. J.

2011. Feedback and the rationing of time and effort among competing tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1076-1086.

125.

Nurse

2005. Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: Exploring the linkages. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 1176-1194.

126.

Ogunfowora

Bourdage

Lee

2010. Rater personality and performance dimension weighting in making overall performance judgments. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25: 465-476.

127.

Pampino

R. N.

MacDonald

J. E.

Mullin

J. E.

Wilder

D. A.

2004. Weekly feedback vs. daily feedback: An application in retail. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23: 21-43.

128.

Payne

S. C.

Horner

M. T.

Boswell

W. R.

Schroeder

A. N.

Stine-Cheyne

K. J.

2009. Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24: 526-544.

129.

Pearce

J. L.

Q. J.

2012. Rating performance or contesting status: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings. Organization Science, 23: 373-385.

130.

Peretz

Fried

2012. National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 448-459.

131.

Pesta

B. J.

Kass

D. S.

Dunegan

K. J.

2005. Image theory and the appraisal of employee performance: To screen or not to screen? Journal of Business and Psychology, 19: 341-360.

132.

Poon

J. M.

2004. Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33: 322-334.

133.

Pritchard

R. D.

Harrell

M. M.

DiazGranados

Guzman

J. M.

2008. The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 540-567.

134.

Pulakos

E. D.

O’Leary

R. S.

2011. Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4: 146-164.

135.

Pullin

Haidar

2003. Performance contract management in regional local government—Victoria. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41: 279-297.

136.

Raeder

Knorr

Hilb

2012. Human resource management practices and psychological contracts in Swiss firms: An employer perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15: 3178-3195.

137.

Rahman

S. A.

2006. Attitudes of Malaysian teachers toward a performance-appraisal system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36: 3031-3042.

138.

Randall

Sharples

2012. The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85: 42-59.

139.

Reb

Greguras

G. J.

2010. Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 213-220.

140.

Reisberg

2006. Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

141.

Roberts

2001. Reward and performance management. In Beardwell

Holden

(Eds.), Human resource management: A contemporary approach: 506-558. Edinburgh: Pearson.

142.

Rodwell

J. J.

Teo

S. T. T.

2008. The influence of strategic HRM and sector on perceived performance in health services organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19: 1825-1841.

143.

Rothstein

H. R.

1990. Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 322-327.

144.

Saffie-Robertson

M. C.

Brutus

2014. The impact of interdependence on performance evaluations: The mediating role of discomfort with performance appraisal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25: 459-473.

145.

Schleicher

D. J.

Bull

R. A.

Green

S. G.

2009. Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of Management, 35: 899-927.

146.

Schleicher

D. J.

Levy

P. E.

Baumann

H. M.

Hartwell

C. J.

2012. Calling all performance management researchers: You need to hear this! Panel discussion presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.

147.

Scullen

S. E.

Mount

M. K.

Goff

2000. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 956-970.

148.

Selden

Sowa

J. E.

2011. Performance management and appraisal in human service organizations: Management and staff perspectives. Public Personnel Management, 40: 251-264.

149.

Selvarajan

T. T.

Cloninger

P. A.

2012. Can performance appraisals motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 3063-3084.

150.

Shahnawaz

M. G.

Juyal

R. C.

2006. Human resource management practices and organizational commitment in different organizations. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 32: 171-178.

151.

Silva

Tosi

H. L.

2004. Determinants of the anonymity of the CEO evaluation process. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16: 87-102.

152.

Silzer

Church

A. H.

2009. The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2: 377-412.

153.

Singh

Mohamed

A. F.

Darwish

2013. A comparative study of performance appraisals, incentives and rewards practices in domestic and multinational enterprises in the country of Brunei Darussalam. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 3577-3598.

154.

Skarlicki

D. P.

Turner

R. A.

2014. Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124: 34-46.

155.

Smither

J. W.

London

Reilly

R. R.

2005. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58: 33-66.

156.

Steelman

L. A.

Levy

P. E.

Snell

A. F.

2004. The Feedback Environment Scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64: 165-184.

157.

Taormina

R. J.

Gao

J. H.

2009. Identifying acceptable performance appraisal criteria: An international perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47: 102-125.

158.

Theeboom

Beersma

van Vianen

A. E.

2014. Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9: 1-18.

159.

Thurston

P. W.

McNall

2010. Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25: 201-228.

160.

Tubre

T. C.

Collins

J. M.

2000. Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance. Journal of Management, 26: 155-169.

161.

Tuytens

Devos

2012a. Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41: 756-776.

162.

Tuytens

Devos

2012b. The effect of procedural justice in the relationship between charismatic leadership and feedback reactions in performance appraisal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 3047-3062.

163.

van der Leeuw

R. M.

Overeem

Arah

O. A.

Heineman

M. J.

Lombarts

K. M. J. M. H.

2013. Frequency and determinants of residents’ narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: Narratives in numbers. Academic Medicine, 88: 1324-1331.

164.

Wang

X. M.

Wong

K. F. E.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

2010. The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 546-561.

165.

Webb Day

Holladay

C. L.

Johnson

S. K.

Barron

L. G.

2014. Organizational rewards: Considering employee need in allocation. Personnel Review, 43: 74-95.

166.

Whiting

S. W.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Pierce

J. R.

2008. Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 125-139.

167.

Williams

J. R.

Levy

P. E.

2000. Investigating some neglected criteria: The influence of organizational level and perceived system knowledge on appraisal reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14: 501-513.

168.

Williams

M. J.

1997. Performance appraisal is dead. Long live performance management. Harvard Management Update, 2: 1-6.

169.

Woehr

D. J.

Sheehan

M. K.

Bennett

2005. Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A multitrait-multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 592-600.

170.

Wong

K. F. E.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

2005. Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation: A perspective from prospect theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 284-294.

171.

Wong

K. F. E.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

2007. Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 577-585.

172.

Wood

R. E.

Marshall

2008. Accuracy and effectiveness in appraisal outcomes: The influence of self-efficacy, personal factors and organisational variables. Human Resource Management Journal, 18: 295-313.

173.

Yang

Klaas

B. S.

2011. Pay dispersion and the financial performance of the firm: Evidence from Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22: 2147-2166.

174.

Youngcourt

S. S.

Leiva

P. I.

Jones

R. G.

2007. Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18: 315-343.

175.

Zheng

Morrison

O’Neill

2006. An empirical study of high performance HRM practices in Chinese SMEs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17: 1772-1803.

176.

Zheng

Zhang

2012. Performance appraisal process and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27: 732-752.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB