This article presents a model for comparing industrial location patterns over time, applied to Canadian data for 1971 and 1996. The Canadian economy is divided into eighteen industrial sectors (manufacturing and services), of which eight are examined in detail. The analysis addresses several questions. Do observed location models for given industries follow predictable patterns? How stable are those patterns over time? Has the relative sensitivity to “distance” of given industries changed over time? Can significant breaks in location patterns be observed over time? The authors consider the possible impact of information technology on location. If “distance is dying,” as is sometimes argued, this should be reflected in changing location patterns. The results show a high degree of stability over time, suggesting that distance is still very much alive.
Braczyk, H., P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich, eds. 1998. Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
2.
Cairncross, F.2001. The death of distance 2.0. How the communications revolution will change our lives. New York: Norton.
3.
Castells, M.1996. The network society. London: Blackwell.
4.
Coffey, W. J., and M. Polèse. 1988. Locational shifts in Canadian employment, 1971-1981, decentralisation versus decongestion. Canadian Geographer32: 248-255.
5.
Coffey, W. J., and R. Shearmur. 1996. Employment growth and change in the Canadian urban system, 1971-1994. Working Paper no. 2, Canadian Policy Research Network, Ottawa.
6.
Crévoisier, O., and R. Camagni, eds. 2001. Les milieux urbains: innovations, systèmes de production et ancrage. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: éditions EDES.
7.
The Economist. 2001. Geography and the Net: Special report. August, pp. 18-21.
8.
Florida, R.1995. Toward the learning region. Futures27: 527-536.
9.
Gaspar, J., and E. Glaeser. 1998. Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics43: 136-156.
10.
Ghemawat, P.2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 131-147.
11.
Glaeser, E. L.1998. Are cities dying?Journal of Economic Perspectives12: 139-160.
12.
Gordon, R. J.2000. Does the “new economy” measure up to the great inventions of the past?Journal of Economic Perspectives14: 49-74.
13.
Graham, D., and N. Spence. 1997. Competition for metropolitan resources: The “crowding out” of London’s manufacturing industry. Environment and Planning A29: 459-484.
Henderson, J. V.1997. Medium sized cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics27: 583-612.
16.
Ingram, G. K.1998. Patterns of metropolitan development: What have we learned?Urban Studies35: 1019-1035.
17.
Kotkin, J.2001. The new geography: How the digital revolution is reshaping the American landscape. New York: Random House.
18.
Maillat, D.1998. From the industrial district to the innovative milieu: Contribution to an analysis of territorialised production organizations. Working Paper, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
19.
McNiven, C., H. Puderer, and D. James. 2000. Census metropolitan areas and census agglomeration influenced zones (MIZ): A description of the methodology. Geography Working Paper Series, no. 2000-02. Statistics Canada, Geography Division, Ottawa.
20.
Polèse, M., and E. Champagne. 1999. Location matters: Comparing the distribution of economic activity in the Mexican and Canadian urban systems. International Regional Science Review22: 102-132.
21.
Polèse, M., and R. Shearmur. 2002. The periphery in the knowledge-based economy: The spatial dynamics of the Canadian economy and the future of non-metropolitan regions in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces. Montreal: INRS-UCS. http://www.inrs-ucs.uquebec.ca.
22.
Quigely, J. M.1998. Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives12: 127-138.
23.
Sassen, S.2000. The global city. 2nd ed.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
24.
Shearmur, R.2001. Economic development in Canadian peripheral regions: A statistical overview. Research Report. Montreal: INRS-UCS. http://www.inrs-ucs.uquebec.ca.
