This article examines the relationship between trust in government and support for local governmental services. It is hypothesized that trust in government will predict support for local government services, but that trust will differentially predict support across policy areas. The results demonstrate that trust predicts support for human services and infrastructure but is not related to support for emergency services. The findings of this article contribute to the broader literature on attitudes toward local governmental services and may hold potential clues for policy makers interested in understanding the factors that shape public preferences for governmental service delivery.
CitrinJack. 1974. Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review68:973–88.
2.
CooperChristopher A.Gibbs KnottsH.BrennanKathleen M.. 2008. The importance of trust in government for public administration: The case of zoning. Public Administration Review68:459–68.
3.
DonahueAmy K.MillerJoanne M.. 2006. Experience, attitudes, and willingness to pay for public safety. American Review of Public Administration36:365–418.
4.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
HammJoseph A.TomkinsAlan J.PytlikZilligLisa M.HerianMitchel N.BornsteinBrian H.NeeleyElizabeth M.. 2011. Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law29:95–115.
6.
HammJoseph A.PytlikZilligLisa M.HerianMitchel N.BornsteinBrian H.TomkinsAlan J.HoffmanLesa. 2013. Deconstructing public confidence in state courts. Journal of Trust Research3:11–31.
7.
HeintzmanRalphMarsonBrian. 2005. People, service, and trust: Is there a public sector service value chain?International Review of Administrative Sciences71:549–75.
8.
HerianMitchel N.Abdel-MonemTarikShankNancy. In press. Trust in Government and support for Government regulation: The case of electronic medical records. Health Expectations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00803.x.
9.
HerianMitchel N.TomkinsAlan J.. 2012. Citizen satisfaction survey data: A mode comparison of the derived importance-performance approach. American Review of Public Administration42:66–86.
10.
HetheringtonMarc J.2005. Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
HetheringtonMarc J.GlobettiSuzanne. 2002. Political trust and racial policy preferences. American Journal of Political Science46:253–75.
12.
HibbingJohn R.Theiss-MorseElizabeth. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
JacobyWilliam G.2000. Public attitudes toward Government spending. American Journal of Political Science44:750–767.
14.
MullinixKevin J.2011. Lingering debates and innovative advances: The state of public opinion research. Policy Studies Journal39:61–76.
15.
MurphyK.2004. The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior28:187–209.
16.
PoortingaWouterPidgeonNick F.. 2003. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis23:691–972.
17.
RahnWendy M.RudolphThomas J.. 2005. A tale of political trust in American cities. Public Opinion Quarterly69:530–60.
18.
RudolphThomas J.2009. Political trust, ideology, and public support for tax cuts. Public Opinion Quarterly73:144–58.
19.
RudolphThomas J.EvansJillian. 2005. Political trust, ideology and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science49:660–671.
20.
SchlesingerMarkHeldmanCaroline. 2001. Gender gap or gender gaps? New perspectives on support for government action and policies. Journal of Politics63:59–92.
21.
SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.. 2005. Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly58:367–79.
22.
ScholzJohn T.LubellMark. 1998. Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science42:903–20.
23.
TolbertC.MossbergerK.. 2006. The effects of e-Government on trust and confidence in Government. Public Administration Review66:354–69.
24.
TylerTom R.HuoYuen J.. 2002. Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and the courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
Van RyzinGregg G.2011. Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 21:745–60.
26.
Van RyzinGregg G.ImmerwahrStephen. 2007. Importance-performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration: An International Quarterly85:215–26.
27.
YangKaifengHolzerMarc. 2006. The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review66:114–26.
