Citizen engagement in local decision-making processes is improving, especially with respect to environmental issues. This research evaluates environmental participation in three jurisdictions. We attempt to explain the success of participation by looking at the benefits of engagement. In all three cases, a significant degree of collaboration between local governments and not-for-profit organizations was present. Institutional commitment to engage the public was evident in the case of Newark, New Jersey, while Tonawanda, New York, delegated citizen engagement functions to the local environmental justice group. Even in less democratic regimes like Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, active environmental participation at local levels was found to be effective.
BakerW.AddamsL.DavisB.. 2005. Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings. Public Administration Review65:490–499.
3.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyRosemary. 2005. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review65:528–39.
4.
DaltonR.2005. The greening of the globe? Cross-national levels of environmental group membership. Environmental Politics14:441–459.
5.
Executive Order 12898. Federal Register. Vol. 59, No.32. February 16, 1994.
FrisbyM.BowmanM.. 1996. What we have here is a failure to communicate. Public Management78:A1–A5.
8.
IrvinR. A.StansburyJ.. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review64:55–65.
9.
KathleneL.MartinJ.. 1991. Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs perspectives, and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management10:46–63.
10.
KingC.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O.. 1998. The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review58:317–26.
11.
KoehlerB.KoontzT.. 2008. Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnership. Environmental Management43:143–54.
12.
LiWanxinLiuJieyanLiDuoduo. 2012. Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management98:65–72.
The United States Department of Justice. 2008. Tonawanda coke and manager sentenced for violating the clean air act and resource conservation and recovery act. Press-Release. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2014/March/14-crm-288.html. (accessed March 20, 2014).
19.
ThomasJ.1990. Public involvement in public management: Adapting and testing a borrowed theory. Public Administration Review50:435–45.
20.
TiulegenovM.2008. Social capital or whether NGOs are the place for collective action? In Kyrgyzstan today: Policy briefs on civil society, migration, Islam, corruption, ed. CooperJ., 12–17. Bishkek: Social Research Center, American University of Central Asia.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 1998. Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
YangK.CallahanK.. 2007. Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review67:249–64.
25.
ZakharchenkoT.2009. On the way to transparency: A comparative study on post-soviet states and the Aarhus convention. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
