This short essay provides a summary of various interpretations of the concept, marginality, with particular focus on positive conceptualizations. From this backdrop, a new term, transcendent marginality, is presented. It is suggested that this term more clearly highlights the emancipatory potential of marginality—both for those occupying marginal positions and for those who may be at (or near) the center but who recognize the inherent oversimplistic, monolithic view of center–periphery dichotomies.
BennettJanet M. 2014. “Cultural Marginality: Identity Issues in Global Leadership Training,” Pp. 269–292 in Advances in Global Leadership (Advances in Global Leadership, Volume 8), edited by OslandJoyce S.LiMingWangYing. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
2.
BohannanPaulGlazerMark, eds. 1988. High Points in Anthropology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
FerrellJeff. 2012. “Outline of a Criminology of Drift,” Pp. 241–56 in New Directions in Criminological Theory, edited by HallSteveWinlowSimon. New York: Routledge.
4.
GoldbergChad Alan. 2012. “Robert Park’s Marginal Man: The Career of a Concept in American Sociology,” Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research. 4 (2): 199–217.
5.
hooksbell.1999. Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
6.
LennonJohn. 1971. “Imagine.” September 1971. Los Angeles: Capitol Records.
7.
MatzaDavid. 1964. “Delinquency and Drift.” Weinheim, Germany: Wiley.
8.
McLaughlinNeil. 2001. “Optimal Marginality: Innovation and Orthodoxy in Fromm’s Revision of Psychoanalysis.” The Sociological Quarterly42 (2): 271–88.
9.
ParkRobert. E.1928. “Human Migration and the Marginal Man.” American Journal of Sociology33 (6): 881–93.
10.
RiesmanDavid. 1954. Individualism Reconsidered: And Other Essays. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11.
TurnerVictor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
