A least-squares strain estimator (LSQSE) for elastography is proposed. It is shown that with such an estimator, the signal-to-noise ratio in an elastogram (SNRe) is significantly improved. This improvement is illustrated theoretically using a modified strain filter and experimentally using a homogeneous gel phantom. It is demonstrated that the LSQSE results in an increase of the elastographic sensitivity (smallest strain that could be detected), thereby increasing the strain dynamic range. Using simulated data, it is shown that a tradeoff exists between the improvement in SNRe and the reduction of strain contrast and spatial resolution.
AndersonW.A.D., Pathology, C.V. Mosby CoSt. Louis, MO (1953).
2.
OphirJ.CéspedesI.GarraB.PonnekantiH.HuangY.MakladN., Elastography: ultrasonic imaging of tissue strain and elastic modulus in vivo. European J. Ultras., 49–70 (1996).
3.
OphirJ.CéspedesE. I.PonnekantiH.YazdiY.LiX., Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 111–134 (1991).
4.
HallT.InsanaM.F.BilgenM., Developing phantoms for elastography, Ultrasonic Imaging18, 70 (1996) (abstract).
5.
O'DonnellM.SkovorodaA.R.ShapoB.M.EmelianovS.Y., Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroel. Freq. Contr.41, 314–325 (1994).
6.
VargheseT.OphirJ., A theoretical framework for performance characterization of elastography: the strain filter, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroel. Freq. Contr.44, 164–174 (1997).
7.
Carter, Coherence and Time Delay Estimation (IEEE PressNew York, NY, 1993).
8.
CéspedesE.I.HuangY.OphirJ.SprattS., Methods for estimation of subsample time delays of digitized echo signals, Ultrasonic Imaging17, 142–171 (1995).
9.
CéspedesI.E.InsanaM.F.OphirJ., Theoretical bounds on strain estimation in Elastography, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroel. Freq. Contr.42, 969–972 (1995).
WalkerF. W.TraheyE. G., A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroel. Freq. Contr.42, 301–308 (1995).
12.
KallelF.VargheseT.OphirI.BilgenM, The nonstationary strain filter in elastography: lateral and elevational decorrelation, Ultrasound Med. Biol.23, 1357–1369 (1997).
13.
KallelF.OphirJ., Three dimensional tissue motion and its effect on image noise in elastography, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroel. Freq. Contr.44, 1286–1296 (1997).
14.
WeinsteinE.WeissA., Fundamental limitations in passive time delay estimation-Part II: Wide-band systems, IEEE Trans. Acoust, Speech, Sig. Proc.31, 1064–1078 (1984).
15.
VargheseT.OphirJ.CéspedesE. I., Noise reduction in elastography using temporal stretching with multicompression averaging, Ultrasound Med. Biol.22, 1043–1052, (1996).
16.
KonofagouE.E.OphirJ.KallelF.VargheseT., Elastographic dynamic range expansion using variable applied strains, Ultrasonic Imaging19, 145–166 (1997).
17.
KayS.M., Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing Estimation Theory (PTR Prentence HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
18.
KallelF.BertrandM.OphirJ., Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study, Ultrasound Med. Biol.22, 463–470 (1996).
19.
KallelF.BertrandM., Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.15, 299–313 (1996).
