Scholars and activists highlight the importance of Indigenous knowledges (IK) in maintaining higher proportions of forest cover and carbon storage in Amazonian territories. When making boundaries, or discussing the differences among knowledge systems, Science and Technology Studies (STS) both engages with and contests binaries including universal/particular or Western/Indigenous. STS further theorizes scale and scalability in relation to the technoscientific dimensions of global environmental challenges. However, analyses of how Indigenous peoples interweave IK in their own climate strategies at different political scales remain scant. Building from collaborative fieldwork, I analyze how Amazonian Indigenous organizations articulate Indigenous or ancestral knowledges (AK) in two climate initiatives: the Coordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon Basin’s (COICA) Amazon Indigenous Initiative to Reduce Deforestation (RIA) and the Organization of Indigenous Peoples of the Colombian Amazon's School of Political Training (the OPIAC School). Drawing on STS theories of boundary work and scaling, I argue that COICA, RIA and the OPIAC School navigate and entangle binaries like modern/traditional or global/local through boundary work, which enables their scaling-up of AK. For instance, they take Indigenous technologies like ecological calendars to national and global scales while also upholding their place-based dimensions. The conclusion discusses how these initiatives expand our understandings of climate politics, knowledge and power.
AriztiaTomasBravoAlineNuñezIgnacio. 2023. “Baroque Tools for Climate Action. What Do We Learn from a Catalogue of Local Technologies?” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society6 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2141015.
5.
BarandiaránJaviera. 2018. Science and Environment in Chile: The Politics of Expert Advice in a Neoliberal Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BeckSilkeForsythTimKohlerPiaLahsenMyannaMahonyMartin. 2017. “36 The Making of Global Environmental Science and Politics.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by FeltUlrikeFouchéRayvonMillerClark Smith-DoerrLaurel, 1059–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
BlaserMario de la CadenaMarisol . 2018. “Introduction: Pluriverse Proposals for a World of Many Worlds.” In A World of Many Worlds, edited by de la CadenaMarisolBlaserMario, 1–22. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
BowkerGeoffrey. 2008. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BravermanIrus. 2018. Coral Whisperers: Scientists on the Brink. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
BridelAnna. 2023. “Democracy in a Deluge: Epistemic Agency of Marginalized Voices in Oaxaca's Storm Governance.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space6 (3): 1705–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221132219.
12.
BulkeleyHarriet. 2005. “Reconfiguring Environmental Governance: Towards a Politics of Scales and Networks.” Political Geography24 (8): 875–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002.
13.
BurawoyMichaelBlumJosephGeorgeShebaGilleZsuzsaThayerMillie. 2000. Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
CifuentesSylvia. 2017. “Global Forest Governance, Poverty and Expert Knowledge in Ecuador: The Case of UN-REDD.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology16 (1): 315–28.
15.
CifuentesSylvia. 2021. “Rethinking Climate Governance: Amazonian Indigenous Climate Politics and Integral Territorial Ontologies.” Journal of Latin American Geography20 (2): 131–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48650426.
16.
CifuentesSylvia. 2023. “Co-Producing Autonomy? Forest Monitoring Programs, Territorial Ontologies, and Indigenous Politics in Amazonia.” Digital Geography and Society5: Article 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100068.
17.
CifuentesSylvia. 2024. “Indigenous Climate Justice and Epistemic Politics in Amazonia.” In The Routledge Handbook of Global Climate Activism, edited by Sabine von Mering, Thomas E. Bell, Alexandre da Silva Faustino, Wendy Steele, Ann Ward, and Mariana Arjona Soberón. 28–43. New York: Routledge.
DanowskiDéborahViveiros de CastroEduardo. 2016. The Ends of the World. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna . 2008. “Introduction: Critical Methodologies and Indigenous Inquiry.” In Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, edited by Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln, and Linda Tuhiwai Smith, 1–20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
EdwardsPaul N. 2013. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
EscobarArturo. 2007a. “Actors, Networks, and New Knowledge Producers: Social Movements and the Paradigmatic Transition in the Sciences.” In Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for a Decent Life, edited by SantosBoaventura, 273–94. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
26.
EscobarArturo. 2007b. “Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise: The Latin American Modernity/Coloniality Research Program.” Cultural Studies21 (2–3): 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506.
27.
ForsythTimWalkerAndrew. 2008. Forest Guardians, Forest Destroyers: The Politics of Environmental Knowledge in Northern Thailand. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
28.
FosterLaura A. 2016. “Decolonizing Patent Law: Postcolonial Technoscience and Indigenous Knowledge in South Africa.” Feminist Formations28 (3): 148–73. 10.1353/ff.2016.0047.
29.
GierynThomas F. 1995. “Boundaries of Science.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Peterson, and Trevor Pinch 393–443. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
GuptaAartiLövbrandEvaTurnhoutEstherVijgeMarjanneke J.. 2012. “In Pursuit of Carbon Accountability: The Politics of REDD+ Measuring, Reporting and Verification Systems.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability4 (6): 726–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004.
31.
HardingSandra. 2016. “Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Alliances and Tensions.” Science, Technology, & Human Values41 (6): 1063–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656465.
32.
HaydenCori. 2003. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
HirschShana Lee. 2020. “Making Global Problems Local: Understanding Large-Scale Environmental Issues Using Ethnographic Methods.” Science, Technology and Human Values45 (5): 963–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920903767.
34.
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. Climate Change and Land. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
JasanoffSheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
JasanoffSheilaMartelloMarybeth, eds. 2004. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
JoksSolveigLawJohn. 2017. “Sámi Salmon, State Salmon: TEK, Technoscience and Care.” The Sociological Review65 (2): 150–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917710428.
39.
KassamKarim-Aly S.RuelleMorganDunnChristopher P.PandyaRajWyndhamFelice. 2023. “Rhythms of the Earth—Editorial Introduction.” GeoHealth7 (4): e2023GH000815. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GH000815.
40.
KimmererRobin Wall. 2013. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
41.
KinchyAbby J.KleinmanDaniel Lee. 2003. “Organizing Credibility: Discursive and Organizational Orthodoxy on the Borders of Ecology and Politics.” Social Studies of Science33 (6): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312703336003.
42.
KohnEduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
KopenawaDaviAlbertBruce. 2013. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
KovachMargaret. 2010. Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
45.
KukutaiTahuTaylorJohn. 2016. Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. Canberra: ANU Press.
46.
LatourBruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
LaurentBriceViolleAlexandre. 2024. “Scaling Up or Deep Scaling? Problematizing the Scalability Imperative in Technological Innovation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values50 (2): 419–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241259411.
48.
LawJohnJoksSolveig. 2019. “Indigeneity, Science, and Difference: Notes on the Politics of How.” Science, Technology, & Human Values44 (3): 424–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918793942.
49.
LiFabiana. 2015. Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
LiboironM.2021. Pollution Is Colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
LyonsKristinaParreñasJunoTamarkinNoah. 2017. “Engagements with Decolonization and Decoloniality in and at the Interfaces of STS.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience3 (1): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28794.
52.
MathewsAndrew S. 2011. Instituting Nature: Authority, Expertise, and Power in Mexican Forests. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
McAfeeKathleen. 2016. “Green Economy and Carbon Markets for Conservation and Development: A Critical View.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics16 (3): 333–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9295-4.
54.
McDonoughKelly S. 2024. Indigenous Science and Technology: Nahuas and the World Around Them. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
55.
McGregorDeborah. 2004. “Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment, and Our Future.” American Indian Quarterly28 (3/4): 385–410. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4138924.
56.
MeehanKatieKlenkNicole L.MendezFabián. 2018. “The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization: Transdisciplinary Research at the Science–Policy Interface(s) in the Americas.” Science, Technology, & Human Values43 (5): 759–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917745601.
57.
MignoloWalter. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
MillerClark A.EdwardsPaul N., eds. 2001. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
OPIAC. 2019. Programa de Territorio y Biodiversidad (Instruction Manual). Bogota, Colombia: Organization of Indigenous Peoples of the Colombian Amazon (OPIAC).
OsborneTraceyCifuentesSylviaDevLauraHowardSeánnaMarchiElisaWitheyLaurenRocha da SilvaMarcelo Santos. 2024. “Climate Justice, Forests, and Indigenous Peoples: Toward an Alternative to REDD+ for the Amazon.” Climatic Change177: 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03774-7.
65.
RAISG - Red Amazónica de Información Socioambiental Georreferenciada. 2015. La contribución de los Pueblos Indígenas Amazónicos es vital para la estabilidad del clima mundial. RAISG.
66.
RajãoRaoniDuqueRicardo B.De’Rahul. 2014. “Introduction: Voices from Within and Outside the South—Defying STS Epistemologies, Boundaries, and Theories.” Science, Technology, & Human Values39 (6): 767–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542161.
67.
RibesDavid. 2014. “Ethnography of Scaling. Or, How to Fit a National Research Infrastructure in the Room.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. Baltimore, Maryland, USA, February 15 - 19, 2014, 158–70. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.25316.
68.
SERNAP and ECA Amarakaeri. 2016. Plan Maestro de la Reserva Comunal Amarakaeri 2016-2020. Lima, Perú: Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (SERNAP).
69.
SimpsonLeanne R. 2004. “Anticolonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge.” American Indian Quarterly8 (3/4): 373–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4138923.
70.
SmithLinda T. 2013. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
71.
StegerManfred B.WilsonErin. 2012. “Anti-Globalization or Alter-Globalization? Mapping the Political Ideology of the Global Justice Movement.” International Studies Quarterly56 (3): 439–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00740.x.
72.
SubramaniamBanuFosterLauraHardingSandraRoyDeboleenaTallBearKim. 2017. “14 Feminism, Postcolonialism, Technoscience.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by FeltUlrike FouchéRayvonMillerClarkSmith-DoerrLaurel, 407–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
TaddeiRenzo. 2022. “20 Kopenawa and the Environmental Sciences in the Amazon.” In Philosophy on Fieldwork: Case Studies in Anthropological Analysis, edited by BubandtNilsWentzerThomas , 353–72. London: Routledge.
TayoriLuisQuicqueKlausQuillahuamánNatividad. 2018. Indicadores Climáticos y Fenológicos del Pueblo Harakbut. Lima, Peru: COHARYIMA, ECA-RCA y PNUD Perú.
77.
TsingAnna Lowenhaupt. 2011. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
TsingAnna Lowenhaupt. 2012. “On Nonscalability: The Living World Is Not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scales.” Common Knowledge18 (3): 505–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-1630424.
79.
UnkuchKevin. 2014. REDD+ Indígena Amazónico-RIA-COICA. Quito, Ecuador: Coordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon Basin (COICA).
80.
VerranHelen. 2002. “A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies: Alternative Firing Regimes of Environmental Scientists and Aboriginal Landowners.” Social Studies of Science32 (5-6): 729–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631270203200506.
81.
Viveiros de CastroEduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America2 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.70845/2572-3626.1010.
82.
WattsLaura. 2019. Energy at the End of the World: An Orkney Islands Saga. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83.
WhyteKyle. 2017. “What Do Indigenous Knowledges Do for Indigenous Peoples?” In Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Sustainability: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability, edited by NelsonMelissa K.ShillingDan, 57–82. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
