The purposes of this study were to investigate the following: (a) the impact of sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and family income on the likelihood of whole-grade skipping between kindergarten and Grade 7 and (b) the effects of grade skipping during elementary or middle school on students’ academic achievement in high school. The authors used the second follow-up data set from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88) to identify 238 students who skipped one grade between kindergarten and Grade 7. They found that females, Whites, and high socioeconomic status students were more likely to skip early. In addition, accelerants skipping kindergarten were more likely to excel in reading and mathematics at the 12th-grade level than those skipping later in elementary and middle school.
AaronB.KromreyJ. D.FerronJ. M. (1998, November). Equating r-based and d-based effect size indices: Problems with a commonly recommended formula. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED433 353)
2.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.Lupkowski-ShoplikA. E. (2004). Whole-grade acceleration. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s students (Vol. II, pp. 77-86). Iowa City: The University of Iowa.
3.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.MarronM. A.CastellanoJ. A.ClinkenbeardP. R.RogersK.SmithD. (2010). Guidelines for developing an academic acceleration policy. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 180-203.
4.
FeldhusenJ. F.ProctorT. B.BlackN. (1986). Guideline for grade advancement of precocious children. Roeper Review, 9, 25-27. doi:10.1080/02783198609553000
5.
FriedmanH. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 245-251. doi:10.1037/h0026258
6.
KostantopoulosS.ModiM.HedgesL. V. (2001). Who are America’s gifted?American Journal of Education, 109, 344-382.
7.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1984). Synthesis of research on effects of accelerated instruction. Educational Leadership, 42, 84-89. doi:10.3102/00346543054003409
8.
LohmanD. F.KorbK. A. (2006). Gifted today but not tomorrow? Longitudinal changes in ability and achievement during elementary school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 451-486.
9.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316-345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
10.
LubinskiD.WebbR. M.MorelockM. J.BenbowC. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
11.
MawhinneyP. E. (1964). We gave up on early entrance. Education Digest, 30, 8-9.
12.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). National education longitudinal study of 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
ObrzutA.NelsonR. B.ObrzutJ. E. (1984). Early school entrance for intellectually superior children: An analysis. Psychology in the schools, 21, 71-77. doi:10.1002/ 1520-6807(198401)21:1<71::AID-PITS2310210113>3.0.CO;2-I
14.
PresseyS. L. (1949). Educational acceleration: Appraisal and basic problems (Bureau of Educational Research Monographs, No. 31). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
15.
RobinsonN. M. (2004). Effects of academic acceleration on the social-emotional status of gifted students. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s students (Vol. II, pp. 59-67). Iowa City: The University of Iowa.
16.
RobinsonN. M.WeimerL. J. (1991). Selection of candidates for early admission to kindergarten and first grade. In SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 29-50). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
RockD. A.PollackJ. M. (1995). Psychometric report for the NELS:88 base year through second follow-up (NCES 95-382). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
RogersK. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396. doi:10.1177/0016986207306324
19.
SaylerM.BrookshireW. K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150-154. doi:10.1177/001698629303700403
20.
SchieverS. W.MakerC. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 163-173). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (2004). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s students (Vol. II, pp. 5-12). Iowa City: The University of Iowa.
22.
SubotnikR.ArnoldK. (2000). Addressing the most challenging questions in gifted education and psychology: A role best suited to longitudinal research. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.SubotnikR.SternbergR. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 243-251). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1989). Money income of households, families, and persons in the United States: 1987. (Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 162). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-162.pdf
25.
WellsR.LohmanD.MarronM. (2009). What factors are associated with grade acceleration?Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 248-273.
