The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of augmented reality to teach a chain task to three elementary-age students with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Augmented reality blends digital information within the real world. This study used a marker-based augmented reality picture prompt to trigger a video model clip of a student brushing her teeth. All students learned how to brush their teeth independently and maintained the skill 9 weeks later with the introduction of augmented reality. Theoretical and teacher implications are discussed in the context of using new technologies to teach students with ASDs.
AfshariJ. (2012). The effect of perceptual-motor training on attention in the children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1331–1336. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.05.003
2.
AlbertoP. A.CihakD. F.GamaR. I. (2005). Use of static picture prompts versus video modeling during simulation instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 327–339. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.002
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
4.
Aurasma, Inc. (2014). Auramsa. (Version 2.7.0). [iPad and iPhone software]. San Francisco, CA: Hewlett-Packard Development Company.
5.
AyresK. M.LangoneJ. (2005). Intervention and instruction with video for students with autism: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 183–196. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23880090
6.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287. doi:10.1177/001440290707300301
8.
BillingsleyF.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
9.
BryanL.GastD. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553–567. doi:10.1023/A:1005687310346
10.
CardonT. A. (2012). Teaching caregivers to implement video modeling imitation training via iPad for their children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4, 1389–1400. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.06.002
11.
CarmignianiJ.FurhtB. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. In FurhtB. (Ed.), Handbook of augmented reality (pp. 3–46). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
CarpentieriS.MorganS. B. (1996). Adaptive and intellectual functioning in autistic and nonautistic retarded children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 611–620. doi:10.1007/BF02172350
13.
ChangY. J.WangT. Y. (2010). Comparing picture and video prompting in autonomous indoor wayfinding for individuals with cognitive impairments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 737–747. doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0285-9
14.
Charlop-ChristyM. H.DennisB.CarpenterM. H.GreenbergA. L. (2010). Teaching socially expressive behaviors to children with autism through video modeling. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 371–393. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/42900075
15.
CihakD. F. (2011). Comparing pictorial and video modeling activity schedules during transitions for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 433–441. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.006
16.
CihakD. F.AlbertoP. A.KesslerK.TaberT. (2004). An investigation of instructional scheduling arrangements and community-based instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 66–88. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2003.04.006
17.
CihakD.FahrenkrogC.AyresK. M.SmithC. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts to improve transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 103–115. doi:10.1177/1098300709332346
18.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
19.
CraigA. B. (2013). Understanding augmented reality: Concepts and applications. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann.
20.
DelanoM. E. (2007). Video modeling interventions for individuals with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 33–42. doi:10.1177/07419325070280010401
21.
Di SerioÁ.IbáñezM. B.KloosC. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
22.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
GenaA.CoulouraS.KymissisE. (2005). Modifying the affective behavior of preschoolers with autism using in-vivo or video modeling and reinforcement contingencies. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 35, 545–556. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0014-9
24.
HammondD.GastD. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs: 1983-2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 187–202. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23879806
25.
HineJ. F.WoleryM. (2006). Using point-of-view video modeling to teach play to preschoolers with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 83–93. doi:10.1177/02711214060260020301
26.
HsiaoK. F.ChenN.-S.HuangS. Y. (2013). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments, 20, 331–349. doi:10.1080/10494820.2010.486682
27.
IngvarssonE. T.LeD. D. (2012). Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.
28.
LiuT.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 515–527. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00329.x
29.
McMahonD. D.CihakD. F.GibbonsM. M.FussellL.MathisonS. (2013). Using a mobile app to teach individuals with intellectual disabilities to identify potential food allergens. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28, 21–32. doi:10.1177/016264341302800302
30.
McMahonD. D.CihakD. F.WrightR.BellS. M. (2016). Augmented reality as an instructional tool for teaching science vocabulary to postsecondary educations students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48, 38–56. doi:10.1080/15391523.2015.1103149
31.
McMahonD.SmithC. C.CihakD. F.WrightR.GibbonsM. (2015). Effects of digital navigation aids on adults with intellectual disabilities: Comparison of printed map, Google maps, and augmented reality via the iPad and iPhone. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 157–165. doi:10.1177/0162643415618927
32.
McPartlandJ.WebbS.KeehnB.DawsonG. (2011). Patterns of visual attention to faces and objects in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 41, 148–157. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1033-8
33.
MechlingL. C. (2007). Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks: A literature review. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 252–269. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23879621
34.
MechlingL. C. (2008). High tech cooking: A literature review of evolving technologies for teaching functional skills. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 43, 474–485. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23879677
35.
MechlingL. C. (2011). Review of twenty-first century portable electronic devices for persons with moderate intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 479–498. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/24232361
36.
MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.BryantK. J.FosterA. L. (2014). Continuous video modeling to assist with completion of multi-step home living tasks by young adults with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 368–380.
37.
MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.FosterA. L.BryantK. J. (2013). Comparing the effects of commercially available and custom-made video prompting for teaching cooking skills to high school students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 371–383. doi:10.1177/0741932513494856
38.
MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.FosterA. L.BryantK. J. (2014). Evaluation of generalized performance across materials when using video technology by students with autism spectrum disorder and moderate intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 208–221. doi:10.1177/1088357614528795
39.
MechlingL.GastD.SeidN. (2009). Using a PDA to increase independent task completion by students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1420–1434. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0761
40.
MeyerA.RoseD.GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST.
41.
QuillK. A. (1997). Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually cued instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 697–714. doi:10.1023/A:1025806900162
42.
RaynerC.DenholmC.SigafoosJ. (2009). Video-based intervention for individuals with autism: Key questions that remain unanswered. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2008.09.001
43.
RichardE.BillaudeauV.RichardP.GaudinG. (2007). Augmented reality for rehabilitation of cognitive disabled children: A preliminary study. 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation, 102–108. doi:10.1109/ICVR.2007.4362148
44.
RoseD. H.GravelJ. W. (2010). Universal design for learning. In PetersonP.BakerE.McGrawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 119–124). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
45.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. A report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Technology. Washington, DC: USDOE. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED451624) Retrieved May 23, 2016 fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED451624.pdf
46.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0904_5
47.
SpoonerF.KnightV.BrowderD.SmithB. (2012). Evidence based practices for teaching academic skills to students with severe. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387. doi:10.1177/0741932511421634
48.
VilkonieneM. (2009). Influence of augmented reality technology upon pupils’ knowledge about human digestive system: The results of the experiment. US-China Education Review, 6, 36–43. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503889.pdf
49.
WilsonK. P. (2012). Teaching social-communication skills to preschoolers with autism: Efficacy of video versus in vivo modeling in the classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1819–1831. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1731-5
50.
YanardagM.AkmanogluN.YilmazI. (2013). The effectiveness of video prompting on teaching aquatic play skills for children with autism. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 47–56. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.687030
