The purpose of this study is to identify social network types in older Korean Americans and to examine their direct associations, as well as interactions with living arrangement, on mental distress. Drawn from the Study of Older Korean Americans (SOKA), participants were aged 60 or over and lived in five states. Analyses included 2,140 cases surveyed during 2017−2018. To identify social network types, latent profile analyses were conducted using 10 network-related criterion variables. A model with five social network types was identified as best fit. The groups were labeled as diverse, moderately diverse, family deficit, friend deficit, and restricted. As hypothesized, greater mental distress was associated with belonging to more deprived networks such as family deficit and restricted groups. Interaction effects also suggest that members of the restricted group were more distressed when they lived alone than when they lived with others. Implications based on the results are discussed.
AdamsK. B.LeibbrandtS.MoonH. (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing & Society, 31(4), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001091
AntonucciT. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 427–453). Academic Press.
5.
AyalonL.LevkovichI.HeynP. C. (2019). A systematic review of research on social networks of older adults. The Gerontologist, 59(3), e164–e176. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx218
6.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857.
7.
BerlinK. S.WilliamsN. A.ParraG. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (Part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084
8.
ChanA.MalhotraC.MalhotraR.ØstbyeT. (2011). Living arrangements, social networks and depressive symptoms among older men and women in Singapore. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(6), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2574
9.
ChengS. T.LeeC. K. L.ChanA. C. M.LeungE. M. F.LeeJ. J. (2009). Social network types and subjective well-being in Chinese older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp075
10.
CornwellE. Y.WaiteL. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000103
11.
DjundevaM.DykstraP. A.FokkemaT. (2019). Is living alone “aging alone”? Solitary living, network types, and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(8), 1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby119
12.
DjundevaM.EllwardtL. (2019). Social support networks and loneliness of polish migrants in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1597691
13.
DongX.ChangE. S. (2017). Social networks among the older Chinese population in the USA: Findings from the PINE Study. Gerontology, 63(3), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455043
FingermanK. L.HuoM.CharlesS. T.UmbersonD. J. (2019). Variety is the spice of late life: Social integration and daily activity. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz007
16.
FioriK. L.AntonucciT. C.AkiyamaH. (2008). Profiles of social relations among older adults: A cross-cultural approach. Ageing & Society, 28(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X07006472
17.
FioriK. L.AntonucciT. C.CortinaK. S. (2006). Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 61(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.P25
GlassT. A.Mendes de LeonC.BassukS. S.BerkmanL. F. (2006). Social engagement and depressive symptoms in late life: Longitudinal findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(4), 604–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264306291017
20.
GreenfieldE. A.RussellD. (2011). Identifying living arrangements that heighten risk for loneliness in later life: Evidence from the U.S. National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30(4), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464810364985
21.
GuoM.StenslandM. (2018). A systematic review of correlates of depression among older Chinese and Korean immigrants: What we know and do not know. Aging & Mental Health, 22(12), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1383971
22.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.BakerM.HarrisT.StephensonD. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
23.
JangY.ParkN. S.ChiribogaD. A.YoonH.KoJ.LeeJ.KimM. T. (2015). Risk factors for social isolation in older Korean Americans. Journal of Aging and Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315584578
24.
JangY.PowersD. A.YoonH.RheeM.-K.ParkN. S.ChiribogaD. A. (2018). Measurement equivalence of English versus native language versions of the Kessler 6 (K6) Scale: An examination in three Asian American groups. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000110
25.
JohnstonK. A. (2018). Toward a theory of social engagement. In JohnstonK. A.TaylorM. (Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 17–32). Wiley.
26.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In BerkmanL. F.KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). Oxford University Press.
27.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban health, 78(3), 458–467.
28.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL. J.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS. L. T.WaltersE. E.ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074
29.
KesslerR. C.BarkerP. R.ColpeL. J.EpsteinJ. F.GfroererJ. C.HiripiE.HowesM. J.NormandS.-L. T.ManderscheidR. W.WaltersE. E.ZaslavskyA. M. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184
30.
KimG.ChiribogaD. A.JangY.LeeS.HuangC.-H.ParmeleeP. (2010). Health status of older Asian Americans in California. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(10), 2003–2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03034.x
31.
KimJ.KimJ. (2019). Exploring health benefits through senior center engagement: A qualitative investigation of older Korean immigrants. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2019.1698121
32.
LeeS.KofferR. E.SpragueB. N.CharlesS. T.RamN.AlmeidaD. M. (2018). Activity diversity and its associations with psychological well-being across adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(6), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw118
33.
LiT.ZhangY. (2015). Social network types and the health of older adults: Exploring reciprocal associations. Social Science & Medicine, 130, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.007
LitwinH. (2009). Social networks and well-being: A comparison of older people in Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean countries. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(5), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp104
37.
LitwinH.Shiovitz-EzraS. (2011a). The association of background and network type among older Americans: Is “who you are” related to “who you are with”?Research on Aging, 33(6), 735–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027511409441
38.
LitwinH.Shiovitz-EzraS. (2011b). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq094
39.
LitwinH.StoeckelK. J. (2014). Confidant network types and well-being among older Europeans. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 762–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt056
LubbenJ. E.BlozikE.GillmannG.IliffeS.von Renteln KruseW.BeckJ. C.StuckA. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503
42.
MinJ. W.LeeS. H. (2015). Validation of the K6/K10 scales of psychological distress and their optimal cutoff scores for older Koreans. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 80(3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415015590316
43.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.
46.
Nylund-GibsonK.ChoiA. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
47.
OhD.ParkJ.LeeH.KimS.ChoiB.NamJ. (2015). Association between living arrangements and depressive symptoms among older women and men in South Korea. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0904-2
48.
OshioT.KanM. (2019). Which is riskier for mental health, living alone or not participating in any social activity? Evidence from a population-based eleven-year survey in Japan. Social Science & Medicine, 233, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.049
ParkN. S.JangY.ChiribogaD. A.ChungS. (2019). Social network types, health, and well-being of older Asian Americans. Aging & Mental Health, 23(11), 1569–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1506751
51.
ParkN. S.JangY.ChiribogaD. A.ChungS. (2020). Profiles of social engagement and their association with loneliness and self-rated health among older Korean immigrants. Research on Aging, 42(9-10), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520927963
52.
ParkN. S.JangY.LeeB. S.KoJ. E.HaleyW. E.ChiribogaD. A. (2015). An empirical typology of social networks and its association with physical and mental health: A study with older Korean immigrants. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt065
53.
RussellD.TaylorJ. (2009). Living alone and depressive symptoms: The influence of gender, physical disability, and social support among Hispanic and non-Hispanic older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(1), S95–S104. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn002
54.
SchmiegeS. J.MeekP.BryanA. D.PetersenH. (2012). Latent variable mixture modeling: A flexible statistical approach for identifying and classifying heterogeneity. Nursing Research, 61(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182539f4c
55.
ShinJ. (2014). The residential choices of ethnic elders in affordable housing: Changing intergenerational relationships and the pursuit of residential independence. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 28(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2014.899541
56.
SohnS. Y.JooW.-t.KimW. J.KimS. J.YoumY.KimH. C.ParkY.-R.LeeE. (2017). Social network types among older Korean adults: Associations with subjective health. Social Science & Medicine, 173(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.042
WareJ. E.Jr (Ed.) (2004). SF-36 health survey update. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59.
WongS. T.YooG. J.StewartA. L. (2006). The changing meaning of family support among older Chinese and Korean immigrants. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), S4–S9.
