Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-1
Evaluating a short-form Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in adolescents: Evidence for a four-factor structure and invariance by time,age,and gender
Little is known about whether a widely used mindfulness measure in adults—the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)—is also reliable and valid in adolescents. The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of a 20-item short-form FFMQ in a sample of 599 high school students (Mage = 16.3 years; 49% female) living in the U.S. Students completed the FFMQ and a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing aspects of psychological well-being and social skills 3 times over the course of one academic year. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a modified four-factor hierarchical model (excluding the Observe subscale and 1 item from the Describe subscale) best fit the data. This four-factor, hierarchical FFMQ demonstrated evidence of measurement invariance across time, gender, and grade level. Reliabilities for the FFMQ total score and its subscales ranged from .61 to .88. The FFMQ total score, and its subscales (excluding Observe), demonstrated evidence of convergent (e.g., with self-compassion) and discriminant (e.g., with social perspective taking skills) validity. Finally, the FFMQ total score and Act with Awareness, Nonjudgment, and Nonreactivity subscales demonstrated evidence of incremental predictive validity for cross-time changes in psychological well-being outcomes (e.g., perceived stress). Overall, results provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of a short-form FFMQ for use in high-school-age adolescents.
AnalayoB. (2003). Satipaṭṭhāna: The direct path to realization. Birmingham, UK: Windhorse.
2.
BaerR. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg015
3.
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.AllenK. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206. doi:10.1177/1073191104268029
4.
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.HopkinsJ.KrietemeyerJ.ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504
5.
BaraldiA. N.EndersC. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
6.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
7.
BergomiC.TschacherW.KupperZ. (2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4, 191–202. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9
8.
BerryD. R.CairoA. H.GoodmanR. J.QuagliaJ. T.GreenJ. D.BrownK. W. (2018). Mindfulness increases prosocial responses toward ostracized strangers through empathic concern. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 93–112. doi:10.1037/xge0000392
9.
BishopS. R.LauM.ShapiroS. L.CarlsonL. E.AndersonN. D.CarmodyJ.…DevinsG. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
10.
BluthK.CampoR. A.FutchW. S.GaylordS. A. (2017). Age and gender differences in the associations of self-compassion and emotional well-being in a large adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 840–853. doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0567-2
11.
BodhiB. (2011). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 19–39. doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564813
12.
BohlmeijerE.ten KloosterP. M.FledderusM.VeehofM.BaerR. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18, 308–320. doi:10.1177/1073191111408231
13.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
14.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
BurkeC. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 133–144. doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9282-x
16.
CalveteE.Gámez-GuadixM.CortazarN. (2017). Mindfulness facets and problematic Internet use: A six-month longitudinal study. Addictive Behaviors, 72, 57–63. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.018
17.
CapraraG. V.StecaP.ZelliA.CapannaC. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77–89. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77
18.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
19.
ChristopherM.NeuserN.MichaelP.BaitmangalkarA. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3, 124–131. doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0086-x
20.
CieslaJ. A.ReillyL. C.DicksonK. S.EmanuelA. S.UpdegraffJ. A. (2012). Dispositional mindfulness moderates the effects of stress among adolescents: Rumination as a mediator. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41, 760–770. doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.698724
21.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404
CurtissJ.KlemanskiD. H. (2014). Factor analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a heterogeneous clinical sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 683–694. doi:10.1007/s10862-014-9429-y
24.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
25.
DesrosiersA.KlemanskiD. H.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2013). Mapping mindfulness facets onto dimensions of anxiety and depression. Behavior Therapy, 44, 373–384. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.001
26.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
27.
DimitrovD. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149. doi:10.1177/0748175610373459
28.
GallaB. M. (2016). Within-person changes in mindfulness and self-compassion predict enhanced emotional well-being in healthy, but stressed adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 204–217. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.016
29.
GoldbergS. B.WielgoszJ.DahlC.SchuylerB.MacCoonD. S.RosenkranzM.…DavidsonR. J. (2016). Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure what we think it does? Construct validity evidence from an active controlled randomized clinical trial. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1009–1014. doi:10.1037/pas0000233
30.
GoodmanM. S.MadniL. A.SempleR. J. (2017). Measuring mindfulness in youth: Review of current assessments, challenges, and future directions. Mindfulness, 8, 1409–1420. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0719-9
31.
GrecoL. A.BaerR. A.SmithG. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23, 606–614. doi:10.1037/a0022819
32.
GuJ.StraussC.CraneC.BarnhoferT.KarlA.CavanaghK.KuykenW. (2016). Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychological Assessment, 28, 791–802. doi:10.1037/pas0000263
33.
Hollis-WalkerL.ColosimoK. (2011). Mindfulness, self-compassion, and happiness in non-meditators: A theoretical and empirical examination. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 222–227. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.033
34.
HouJ.WongS. Y. S.LoH. H. M.MakW. W. S.MaH. S. W. (2013). Validation of a Chinese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kong and development of a short form. Assessment, 21, 363–371. doi:10.1177/1073191113485121
35.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
36.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (version 24). Armonk, NY: Author.
37.
LevinsonD. B.StollE. L.KindyS. D.MerryH. L.DavidsonR. J. (2014). A mind you can count on: Validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01202
38.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
39.
MedvedevO. N.NordenP. A.KrägelohC. U.SiegertR. J. (2018). Investigating unique contributions of dispositional mindfulness facets to depression, anxiety, and stress in general and student populations. Mindfulness, 9, 1757–1767. doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0917-0
40.
MedvedevO. N.SiegertR. J.KerstenP.KrägelohC. U. (2017). Improving the precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using a Rasch approach. Mindfulness, 8, 995–1008. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0676-8
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
42.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Common Core of Data (CCD): Public school data 2015-16, 2017-18 school years. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/index.asp
43.
PallozziR.WertheimE.PaxtonS.OngB. (2017). Trait mindfulness measures for use with adolescents: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 8, 110–125. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0567-z
44.
RaesF.PommierE.NeffK. D.Van GuchtD. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 250–255. doi:10.1002/cpp.702
45.
RoeserR. W.ColaianneB. A.GreenbergM. T. (2018). Compassion and human development: Current approaches and future directions. Research in Human Development, 15, 238–251. doi:10.1080/15427609.2018.1495002
46.
RoeserR. W.EcclesJ. S. (2015). Mindfulness and compassion in human development: Introduction to the special section. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1–6. doi:10.1037/a0038453
47.
Royuela-ColomerE.CalveteE. (2016). Mindfulness facets and depression in adolescents: Rumination as a mediator. Mindfulness, 7, 1092–1102. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0547-3
48.
RudnevM.LytkinaE.DavidovE.SchmidtP.ZickA. (2018). Testing measurement invariance for a second-order factor. A cross-national test of the Alienation Scale. Methods, Data, Analyses, 12, 47–76. doi:10.12758/mda.2017.11
49.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
50.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
51.
SauerS.WalachH.SchmidtS.HinterbergerT.LynchS.BüssingA.KohlsN. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4, 3–17. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5
52.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147
53.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
SegalE. A.CiminoA. N.GerdesK. E.HarmonJ. K.WagamanM. A. (2013). A confirmatory factor analysis of the interpersonal and social empathy index. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 131–153. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2013.9
55.
ShapiroS. L.CarlsonL. E.AstinJ. A.FreedmanB. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373–386. doi:10.1002/jclp.20237
56.
SkinnerE.PitzerJ.SteeleJ. (2013). Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multidimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 803–835. doi:10.1177/0013164413485241
57.
TranU. S.GlückT. M.NaderI. W. (2013). Investigating the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Construction of a short form and evidence of a two-factor higher order structure of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 951–965. doi:10.1002/jclp.21996
58.
Van DamN. T.van VugtM. K.VagoD. R.SchmalzlL.SaronC. D.OlendzkiA.…MeyerD. E. (2018). Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 36–61. doi:10.1177/1745691617709589
59.
van SonJ.NyklíčekI.NefsG.SpeightJ.PopV. J.PouwerF. (2014). The association between mindfulness and emotional distress in adults with diabetes: Could mindfulness serve as a buffer? Results from Diabetes MILES: The Netherlands. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 251–260. doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9592-3
60.
VeehofM. M.ten KloosterP. M.TaalE.WesterhofG. J.BohlmeijerE. T. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in patients with fibromyalgia. Clinical Rheumatology, 30, 1045–1054. doi:10.1007/s10067-011-1690-9
61.
WidamanK. F.FerrerE.CongerR. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10–18. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
62.
WilliamsM. J.DalgleishT.KarlA.KuykenW. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the Self-Compassion Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26, 407–418. doi:10.1037/a0035566
63.
ZieglerM.KemperC. J.KruyenP. (2014). Short scales–Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 185–189. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
