The present guide provides a practical guide to conducting latent profile analysis (LPA) in the Mplus software system. This guide is intended for researchers familiar with some latent variable modeling but not LPA specifically. A general procedure for conducting LPA is provided in six steps: (a) data inspection, (b) iterative evaluation of models, (c) model fit and interpretability, (d) investigation of patterns of profiles in a retained model, (e) covariate analysis, and (f) presentation of results. A worked example is provided with syntax and results to exemplify the steps.
AldridgA. ARoescS. C. (2008). Developing coping typologies of minority adolescents: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 499–517. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.08.005
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014a). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 329–341.
3.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014b). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary second model. Mplus Web Notes: No. 21. May 14, 2014. Revised July 16, 2018.
4.
BaraldiA. N.EndersC. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
5.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.3
6.
BergmanL. R.MagnussonD. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319. doi:10.1017/S095457949700206X
7.
BergmanL. R.MagnussonD.El KhouriB. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
8.
BolckA.CroonM.HagenaarsJ. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27.
9.
CeleuxG.SoromenhoG. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.
10.
ChristieC. A.MasynK. E. (2008). Latent profiles of evaluators’ self-reported practices. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23, 225–254.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2013). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
EckK. V.JohnsonS. R.BettencourtA.JohnsonS. L. (2017). How school climate relates to chronic absence: A multi-level latent profile analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 89–102. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2016.10.001
14.
FergusonS. L.HullD. M. (2019). Exploring science career interest: Latent profile analysis of high school occupational preferences for science. Journal of Career Development, 46, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0894845318783873
15.
FinchW. H.BronkK. C. (2011). Conducting confirmatory latent class analysis using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 132–151. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.532732
16.
GibsonW. A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24, 229–252.
17.
GudichaD. (2015). Power analysis methods for tests in latent class and latent Markov models. Ridderkerk, the Netherlands: Ridderprint BV.
18.
HensonR. K.HullD. M.WilliamsC. S. (2010). Methodology in our education research culture: Toward a stronger collective quantitative proficiency. Educational Researcher, 39, 229–240.
19.
HippJ. R.BauerD. J. (2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11, 36–53. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.36
20.
HowardW. J.RhemtullaM.LittleT. D. (2015). Using principal components as auxiliary variables in missing data estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 285–299.
21.
KimS. Y. (2014). Determining the number of latent classes in single-and multiphase growth mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 263–279. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.882690
22.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
LoY.MendellN. R.RubinD. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
24.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
25.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
26.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.MorinA. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010
27.
MasynK. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In LittleT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
MasynK. E. (2017). Measurement invariance and differential item functioning in latent class analysis with stepwise multiple indicator multiple cause modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 180–197.
29.
McLachlanG. J. (1987). On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Applied Statistics, 36, 318–324. doi:10.2307/2347790
30.
McLarnonM. J. W.O’NeillT. A. (2018). Extensions of auxiliary variable approaches for the investigation of mediation, moderation, and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods, 21, 955–982. doi:10.1177/1094428118770731
31.
MorganG. B. (2015). Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 76–86. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.935751
32.
MorinA. J. S.MeyerJ. P.CreusierJ.BietryF. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 231–254. doi:10.1177/1094428115621148
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. (Original work published 1998)
35.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
36.
Nylund-GibsonK.ChoiA. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Sciences, 4, 440–461. doi:10.1037/tps0000176
37.
Nylund-GibsonK.GrimmR. P.MasynK. E. (2019). Prediction from latent classes: A demonstration of different approaches to include distal outcomes in mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 967–985. doi:10.1080/10705511.2019.1590146
38.
Nylund-GibsonK.GrimmR.QuirkM.FurlongM. (2014). A latent transition mixture model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915375
39.
Nylund-GibsonK.MasynK. E. (2016). Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 782–797. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1221313
40.
OberskiD. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In RobertsonJ.KapteinM. (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
41.
OsborneJ. W. (2012). Best practices in data cleaning: A complete guide to everything you need to do before and after collecting your data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ParkJ.YuH. T. (2017). Recommendations on the sample sizes for multilevel latent class models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Retrieved fromhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013164417719111. doi:10.1177/0013164417719111.
44.
PeughJ.FanX. (2015). Enumeration index performance in generalized growth mixture models: A Monte Carlo test of Muthén’s (2003) hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 115–131. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.919823
45.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttp://quantpsy.org/.
46.
RybakT. M.AliJ. S.BerlinK. S.KlagesK. L.BanksG. G.KamodyR. C.…Diaz-ThomasA. M. (2017). Patterns of family functioning and diabetes-specific conflict in relation to glycemic control and health-related quality of life among youth with Type I Diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42, 40–51. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsw071
47.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338.
48.
SterbaS. K. (2013). Understanding linkages among mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 775–815. doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.827564
49.
TeinJ. Y.CoxeS.ChamH. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 640–657. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
50.
VermuntJ. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.
51.
VermuntJ. K.MagidsonJ. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In HagenaarsJ.McCutcheonA. (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis. (pp. 89–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
VincentW. J.WeirJ. P. (2012). Statistics in kinesiology (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
