Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social norms are vital for the functioning of adolescent peer groups; they can protect the well-being of groups and individual members, often by deterring harmful behaviors, such as aggression, through enforcement mechanisms like peer victimization; in adolescent peer groups, those who violate aggression norms are often subject to victimization. However, adolescents are nested within several levels of peer group contexts, ranging from small proximal groups, to larger distal groups, and social norms operate within each. This study assessed whether there are differences in the enforcement of aggression norms at different levels. Self-report and peer-nomination data were collected four times over the course of a school year from 1,454 early adolescents (M _age = 10.27; 53.9% boys) from Bogota, Colombia. Multilevel modeling provided support for social regulation of both physical aggression and relational aggression via peer victimization, as a function of gender, grade-level, proximal (friend) or distal (class) injunctive norms of aggression (perceptions of group-level attitudes), and descriptive norms of aggression. Overall, violation of proximal norms appears to be more powerfully enforced by adolescent peer groups. The findings are framed within an ecological systems theory of adolescent peer relationships.

Keywords

Relational aggression physical aggression peer victimization misfit effect social norms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

P. A.

Adler

(1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press.

Bass

E. C.

Saldarriaga

L. M.

da Cunha

J. M.

Chen

Santo

J. B.

Bukowski

W. M.

(2016). A cross-cultural analysis of the relations of physical and relational aggression with peer victimization. The International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 132–142.

Bell

D. C.

Cox

M. L.

(2015). Social norms: Do we love norms too much? Journal of Family Theory and Review, 7 (1), 28–46.

Berger

(2008). Influence of peer group norms on aggression in early adolescence [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].

Berger

Caravita

S. C. S.

(2016). Why do early adolescents bully? Exploring the influence of prestige norms on social and psychological motives to bully. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 45–56.

Boivin

Dodge

K. A.

Coie

J. D.

(1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (2), 269–279.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Busching

Krahe

(2015). The girls set the tone: Gendered classroom norms and the development of aggression in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (5), 659–676.

Chang

(2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40 (5), 691–702.

10.

Cialdini

R. B.

Trost

M. R.

(1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert

D. T.

Fiske

S. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.

11.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Rose

A. J.

(2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105.

12.

Cornell

D. G.

Brockenbrough

(2004). Identification of bullies and victims: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Violence, 3(2-3), 63–87.

13.

Crick

N. R.

Grotpeter

J. K.

(1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x

14.

Esbjorn

Fjalland

E. L. P.

(2012). Colombia—Social stratification by law. International Federation for Housing and Planning. http://www.ifhp.org/ifhp-office

15.

Horne

(2001). The enforcement of norms: Group cohesion and meta-norms. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(3), 253–266.

16.

Juvonen

Graham

Schuster

M. A.

(2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6 Pt 1), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.6.1231

17.

Kitts

J. A.

(2006). Collective action, rival incentives, and the emergence of antisocial norms. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 235–259.

18.

Kline

R. B.

(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

19.

Kuppens

Grietens

Onghena

Michiels

Subramanian

S. V.

(2008). Individual and classroom variables associated with relational aggression in elementary-school aged children: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.005

20.

Lansford

J. E.

Skinner

A. T.

Sorbring

Di Guinta

Deater-Deckard

Dodge

K. A.

Malone

P. S.

Oburu

Pastorelli

Tapanya

Tirado

L. M. U.

Zelli

Al-Hassan

S. M.

Alampay

L. P.

Bacchini

Bombi

A. S.

Bornstein

M. H.

Chang

(2012). Boys and girls relational and physical aggression in nine countries. Aggressive Behavior, 38(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21433

21.

Maccoby

E. E.

(1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Harvard University Press.

22.

Masten

A. S.

Morison

Pellegrini

D. S.

(1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523

23.

Miller

D. T.

McFarland

(1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In Suls

Willis

T. A.

(Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287–313). Erlbaum.

24.

Nipedal

Nesdale

Killen

(2010). Social group norms, school norms, and children’s aggressive intentions. Aggressive Behavior, 36(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20342

25.

Oliver

(1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85(6), 1356–1375.

26.

Ostrov

J. M.

(2010). Prospective associations between peer victimization and aggression. Child Development, 81(6), 1670–1677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01501.x

27.

Ostrov

J. M.

Godleski

S. A.

(2013). Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 25(3), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000187

28.

Potocnjak

Berger

Tomicic

(2011). Una aproximación relacional a la violencia escolar entre pares en adolescentes chilenos: perspectiva adolescente de los factores intervinientes. Psykhe, 20(2), 39–52.

29.

Rodkin

P. C.

Farmer

T. W.

Pearl

Van Acker

(2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00336.x

30.

Rodkin

Ryan

A. M.

(2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in an educational context. In Harris

Graham

Urdan

(Eds.), Educational psychology handbook (pp. 363–389). APA Publications.

31.

Santo

J. B.

Bass

E. C.

Stella-Lopez

Bukowski

W. M.

(2017). Contextual influences on the relations of physical and relational aggression with peer victimization. School Psychology International, 38(1), 42–59.

32.

Veenstra

Dijkstra

J. K.

Kreager

D. A.

(2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

Rubin

K. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp.45–63). Guilford.

33.

Velasquez

A. M.

Drury

Saldarriaga

L. M.

Santo

J. B.

Stella-Lopez

Bukowski

W. M.

(2016). Peer rejection as a social regulation mechanism of group norms: The case of aggression across sex. Journal of Latino and Latin American Studies, 8(2), 47–58.

34.

Velasquez

A. M.

Santo

J. B.

Saldarriaga

L. M.

Lupez

L. S.

Bukowski

W. M.

(2010). Context-dependent victimization and aggression differences between all-girl and mixed-sex schools. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0054

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.10 MB

0.00 MB

Unpacking the misfit effect: Exploring the influence of gender and social norms on the association between aggression and peer victimization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material