This article reports a contextual model of information literacy (IL) which emerged from an exploratory case study of IL in a joint online distance learning (ODL) Geographic Information Sciences/Systems (GIS) programme, and demonstrates how it contributes to the development of information literate GIS learners in ODL environments. Adopting Eisenhardt’s (1989) ‘process of building theories from case study research’, it explores IL in the context of a wide range of teaching and learning experiences in the programme, using interview, questionnaire, students’ reflection, observation and document study as data collection methods. The two-level within- and across-case analysis, suggested by Eisenhardt, was innovatively combined with grounded theory data analysis approaches. It appeared that in the ODL GIS programmes IL is needed, not just as a set of transferable skills, but as an enabler for independent, connective, transferable and lifelong learning.
The Chartered Institute of Information and Library Professionals (CILIP), A short introduction to information literacy ( 2006), http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/advocacy/learning/information-literacy/Pages/definition.aspx (accessed 27 August 2010).
2.
S. Webber, S. Boon and B. Johnston, A comparison of UK academics’ conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and Marketing, Library and Information Research, 30(93) (2005) 4-15.
3.
G.J. Leckie and A. Fullerton, Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices, College and Research Libraries, 60(1) (1999) 9-29.
4.
A. Lloyd, Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture, Journal of Documentation, 65(5) (2006) 570-83.
5.
C. Bruce, Seven faces of information literacy (Auslib Press, Adelaide, 1997).
6.
S. Boon, B. Johnston and S. Webber, A phenomenographic study of English faculty’s conceptions of information literacy, Journal of Documentation, 63(2) (2007) 204-28.
7.
M. Lupton, Information literacy and learning (Unpublished thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, PhD, 2008).
8.
Y.D. Wu and S.L. Kendall, Teaching faculty’s perspectives on business information literacy, Reference Services Review, 34(1) (2006) 86-96.
9.
M. Nazari, Design and process of a contextual study of information literacy, Library and Information Science Research, 32(3) (2010) 179-91.
10.
J.J. Shapiro and S.K. Hughes, Information literacy as a liberal art , Educom Review, 31(2) (1996), http://net.educause.edu/apps/er/review/reviewarticles/31231.html (accessed 27 August 2010).
11.
R.K. Yin , Case study research: design and methods ( Sage, London, 2003).
12.
M. Denscombe , The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects (Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2003).
13.
L.M. Dooley , Case study research and theory building, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3) (2002) 335-54.
14.
K.M. Eisenhardt , Building theories from case study research, The Academy of Management Review, 14(4) (1989) 532-50.
15.
R.E. Stake , The case study method in social inquiry, Educational Researcher, 7(2) (1978) 5-8.
16.
M. Nazari ( 2009) Information literacy for online distance learning GIS programmes (Unpublished thesis, University of Sheffield , PhD, 2009).
17.
N. Fahey , The importance of addressing accepted training needs when designing electronic information literacy training, Informing Science, 6 (2003) 173-85.
18.
A. Armstrong and H. Georgas, Using interactive technology to teach information literacy concepts to undergraduate students, Reference Services Review, 34(6) (2006) 491-7.
19.
J. Parker, Going beyond Google at the Open University. In: P. Goodwin and J. Parker (eds), Information literacy meets library 2.0 (Facet Publishing , London, 2008).
20.
P. Williams, P. Opinion: against information literacy, Library + Information Update ( 2006), http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/3844/1/againstinformationliteracy1.pdf (accessed 27 August 2010).
21.
A. Martin , Essential E-literacy, Connected , (9) (2003) 22-4.
22.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), Information literacy competency standards for higher education: introduction (2000), http://archive.ala.org/acrl/il/toolkit/intro.html#highered (accessed 27 August 2010).
23.
A. Bundy, Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: principles, standards and practice (Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL), Adelaide, 2004).
24.
C.R. McClure , Network literacy: a role for libraries, Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2) (1994) 115-25.
25.
R. Savolainen , Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: from definitions towards a social cognitive model, Journal of Documentation, 58(2) (2002) 211-26.
26.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), Information literacy competency standards for higher education (2010), http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm (accessed 27 August 2010).
27.
Society of College, National and University Libraries (SCONUL), Information skills in higher education: briefing paper (SCONUL Advisory Committee on Information Literacy, UK, 1999).
28.
J. Jablonski , Information literacy for GIS curricula: an instructional model for faculty, Journal of Map & Geography Libraries , 1(1) ( 2004) 41-58.
29.
M. Massey, National collaborative projects for information and spatial literacy, Information Technology and Information Literacy Conference ( University of Glasgow, UK, 2002).
30.
D. DiBiase et al., Geographic information science and technology: body of knowledge (UCGIS, USA, 2006).
31.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) , Guidelines for developing a successful and sustainable higher education GIS program: an ESRI white paper. (ESRI , Redlands, CA, 2002)
32.
C.M. Gold, Breadth versus depth: the dilemma of G.I.S. education, in Proceedings, G.I.S. - challenge for the 1990s (1989), http://www.voronoi.com/wiki/images/c/c1/Breadth_versus_depth.pdf (accessed 27August 2010).
33.
A.B. Johnson , Developing a GIS curriculum ( 2006), http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0706/curricula.html (accessed 27 August 2010).
34.
J.C. Librakin , Geoscience education in the United States, Planet, 17 (2006) 60-3.
35.
D.J. Unwin, Curriculum design for GIS, NCGIA core curriculum in GIScience ( 1997), http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/education/curricula/giscc/units/u160/u160_f.html (accessed 27 August 2010).
36.
M. Nazari and S. Webber, Model of Geo/Spatial Information literacy. In EUGISES2008: Sixth European GIS Education Seminar (Cirencester, UK, 11-14 September 2008).
37.
B. Glaser and A. Strauss, The discovery of the grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1967).
38.
R.K. Yin , The case study crisis: some answers, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1) (1981) 58-65.
39.
M. Nazari and S. Webber, What do the conceptions of geospatial information tell us about information literacy?Journal of Documentation, 67(2) (2010), online.
40.
J. Biggs, Teaching for quality learning at university (SRHE &Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1999).
41.
S. Webber, The seven headline skills expanded (2008), http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/headline_skills.html (accessed 27 August 2010).
42.
M. Nazari and S. Webber, Conceptions of Geospatial Information in online distance learning GIS programmes, MCCSIS’08: IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (IADIS Press, Amsterdam , 2008).
