In the past couple of years, the concept of “ethical climate” has evolved into an increasingly popular keyword dominating news headlines, producing a worldwide interest. The existence of unethical work environments and ethically dubious business practices has sparked a surge in curiosity about the ethical climate.
Objective
The main purpose of this study is to examine the potential impact of ethical climate on employee subjective wellbeing, directly as well as indirectly, through a mediator psychological empowerment.
Methods
A theoretical framework is created by utilizing the situational strength theory. The postulated hypotheses were examined through the analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained from 435 employees from the Indian IT industry via an online questionnaire. The model was evaluated using SmartPLS 4.0 software.
Results
The current study established a positive nexus between ethical climate and subjective wellbeing. Additionally, psychological empowerment partially mediates the nexus between ethical climate and subjective wellbeing.
Conclusions
The present study advanced the ethical climate literature by demonstrating that the ethical climate affects employees’ psychological empowerment and subjective wellbeing. Furthermore, the proposed theoretical model can be applied to different industries inside the country and other countries with similar features.
ParboteeahKPWeissMHoeglM. Ethical climates across national contexts: A meta-analytical investigation. J Bus Ethics2024; 189(3): 573–590.
2.
XuSYaacobZCaoD. Casting light on the dark side: unveiling the dual-edged effect of unethical pro-organizational behavior in ethical climate. Curr Psychol2024; 43(16): 14448–14469.
3.
Al HalbusiHWilliamsKARamayahT, et al.Linking ethical leadership and ethical climate to employees’ ethical behavior: the moderating role of person–organization fit. Person Rev2021; 50(1): 159–185.
4.
OzdobaPDziurkaMPilewska-KozakA, et al.Hospital ethical climate and job satisfaction among nurses: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(8): 4554.
5.
CraneAMattenDGlozerS, et al.Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. USA: Oxford University Press, 2019.
6.
AprilKPetersKLockeK, et al.Ethics and leadership: enablers and stumbling blocks. J Publ Aff2010; 10(3): 152–172.
7.
DeyMBhattacharjeeSMahmoodM, et al.Ethical leadership for better sustainable performance: Role of employee values, behavior and ethical climate. J Clean Prod2022; 337: 130527.
8.
KuenziMMayerDMGreenbaumRL. Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Person Psychol2020; 73(1): 43–71.
9.
DecosterSStoutenJTrippTM. When employees retaliate against self-serving leaders: The influence of the ethical climate. J Bus Ethics2021; 168: 195–213.
10.
HaldoraiKKimWGChangHS, et al.Workplace spirituality as a mediator between ethical climate and workplace deviant behavior. Int J Hospit Manag2020; 86: 102372.
11.
RivaiRGaniMUMurfatMZ. Organizational culture and organizational climate as a determinant of motivation and teacher performance. Adv Soc Sci Res J2019; 6(2): 555–566.
12.
JhaINPalDSarkarS. Unlocking the secret to happiness at work: the power of inclusive leadership, organizational justice and workplace inclusion. J Manag Dev2024; 43(2): 200–221.
13.
DasKVJones-HarrellCFanY, et al.Understanding subjective well-being: perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Rev2020; 41: 1–32.
14.
LyuZ. Religious tourism motivation, tourism imagery, tourism satisfaction, happiness and loyalty of tourists to Foguang temple of Wutai mountain: literature review, expert evaluation and pre-research. In: International Academic Multidisciplinary Research Conference in Tokyo 2024, Tokyo, Japan, 21-23 January, 2024, pp. 235–249.
15.
OnyishiCNEdeMOOssaiOV, et al.Rational emotive occupational health coaching in the management of police subjective well-being and work ability: a case of repeated measures. J Police Crim Psychol2021; 36(1): 96–111.
16.
MoreSK. An analytical study of the ethical problems in India’s digital service sector and their impact on attrition in the IT industry. UK: University of Salford, 2018.
17.
RasoolSFWangMTangM, et al.How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18(5): 2294.
18.
JhaJKSinghM. Who cares about ethical practices at workplace? A taxonomy of employees’ unethical conduct from top management perspective. Int J Organ Anal2023; 31(2): 317–339.
19.
SinghPBalaHDeyBL, et al.Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing. J Bus Res2022; 151: 269–286.
20.
LeeDJYuGBSirgyMJ, et al.The effects of explicit and implicit ethics institutionalization on employee life satisfaction and happiness: The mediating effects of employee experiences in work life and moderating effects of work–family life conflict. J Bus Ethics2018; 147: 855–874.
21.
AlagarsamySMehroliaSAranhaRH. The mediating effect of employee engagement: how employee psychological empowerment impacts the employee satisfaction? A study of Maldivian tourism sector. Global Bus Rev2023; 24(4): 768–786.
22.
KahveciAYıldırımA. The effect of organisational virtuousness on ethical climate and psychological well-being. Doctoral dissertation. Karaman: Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University.
23.
SuWHahnJ. A multi-level study on whether ethical climate influences the affective well-being of millennial employees. Front Psychol2022; 13: 1028082.
24.
ZhangNLiJBuX, et al.Bridging the gap between ethical climate and nurses’ service behaviors: the critical role of professional well-being. Int J Ment Health Promot2018; 20(3): 99–110.
25.
BoceanCGNicolescuMMCazacuM, et al.The role of social responsibility and ethics in employees’ wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(14): 8838.
26.
SahaiAMahapatraM. Subjective well-being at workplace: a review on its implications. Journal of Critical Reviews2020; 7(11): 807–810.
27.
HayatAAfshariL. Supportive organizational climate: a moderated mediation model of workplace bullying and employee well-being. Person Rev2021; 50(7/8): 1685–1704.
28.
MeyerRDDalalRSHermidaR. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J Manag2010; 36(1): 121–140.
29.
NewmanARoundHBhattacharyaS, et al.Ethical climates in organizations: A review and research agenda. Bus Ethics Q2017; 27(4): 475–512.
30.
NazUTasneemSSJabeenR, et al.The effects of ethical climate on bullying behavior in the workplace. J Bus Ethics2019; 9: 1157–1170.
31.
GiacaloneRAPromisloMD. Unethical and unwell: Decrements in well-being and unethical activity at work. J Bus Ethics2010; 91: 275–297.
32.
SpreitzerGM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J1995; 38(5): 1442–1465.
33.
QuallsWJPutoCP. Organizational climate and decision framing an integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. J Market Res1989; 26(2): 179–192.
34.
GuerciMRadaelliGSilettiE, et al.The impact of human resource management practices and corporate sustainability on organizational ethical climates: An employee perspective. J Bus Ethics2015; 126: 325–342.
35.
FeinECTzinerALuskyL, et al.Relationships between ethical climate, justice perceptions, and LMX. Leader Organ Dev J2013; 34(2): 147–163.
36.
SchwepkerJCHValentineSRGiacaloneRA, et al.Good barrels yield healthy apples: organizational ethics as a mechanism for mitigating work-related stress and promoting employee well-being. J Bus Ethics2021; 174(1): 143–159.
37.
HuhtalaMKapteinMFeldtT. How perceived changes in the ethical culture of organizations influence the well-being of managers: A two-year longitudinal study. Eur J Work Organ Psychol2016; 25(3): 335–352.
38.
JovanovićTMijatovMDraginAS, et al.Identification of predictors’ effects on perceiving the ethical climate and job satisfaction within Serbian tourism industry. J Manag Organ2022; 28(1): 120–148.
39.
SongHGuQZhangZ. An exploratory study of teachers’ subjective wellbeing: Understanding the links between teachers’ income satisfaction, altruism, self-efficacy and work satisfaction. Teachers and Teaching2020; 26(1): 3–31.
40.
ParaltaRSimõesEDuarteAP. Subjective well-being in organizations: Effects of internal ethical context and ethical leadership. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20(5): 4451.
41.
ShinY. CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Ethics2012; 108: 299–312.
42.
HomansGC. The human group. Boston, MA: Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1950.
43.
Shapira-LishchinskyORosenblattZ. Organizational ethics and teachers’ intent to leave: An integrative approach. Educ Adm Q2009; 45(5): 725–758.
44.
BanduraA. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: Handbook of moral behavior and development. Hove: Psychology press, 2014, pp. 45–103.
45.
RousseauDM. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Empl Responsib Rights J1989; 2: 121–139.
46.
ZhangMGuanZWangY. Influential factors and correlation analysis of hospital ethical climate and psychological empowerment of ICU nurses. Nurs Commun2019; 3(5): 159–165.
47.
PradhanRKHatiLKumarU. Impact of employee wellbeing on psychological empowerment: mediating role of happiness. Int J Manuf Technol Manag2017; 31(6): 581–595.
48.
Van der MeerPH. What makes workers happy: Empowerment, unions or both?Eur J Ind Relat2019; 25(4): 363–376.
49.
LiXLinC. The influence of high-commitment work system on work well-being: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of leader trust. Person Rev2021; 50(4): 1128–1147.
50.
GuestDE. Human resource management and employee well‐being: towards a new analytic framework. Human Res Mgmt Journal2017; 27(1): 22–38.
51.
ManganelliLThibault-LandryAForestJ, et al.Self-determination theory can help you generate performance and well-being in the workplace: A review of the literature. Adv Develop Hum Resour2018; 20(2): 227–240.
52.
ErozkanADoganUAdiguzelA. Self-efficacy, self-esteem, and subjective happiness of teacher candidates at the Pedagogical Formation Certificate Program. J Educ Train Stud2016; 4(8): 72–82.
53.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol2000; 55(1): 68–78.
54.
SparksKFaragherBCooperCL. Well‐being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. J Occup Organ Psychol2001; 74(4): 489–509.
55.
GoswamiAKAgrawalRK. It’sa knowledge centric world! Does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? Psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator. J Knowl Manag2023; 27(3): 584–612.
56.
LiuYZhangYJinJ. The relationships of ethical climate, physician–nurse collaboration and psychological empowerment with critical care nurses’ ethical conflict in China: A structural equation model. J Nurs Manag2022; 30(7): 2434–2441.
57.
HempelPSZhangZXHanY. Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. J Manag2012; 38(2): 475–501.
58.
KunAGadaneczP. Workplace happiness, well-being and their relationship with psychological capital: A study of Hungarian Teachers. Curr Psychol2022; 41(1): 185–199.
59.
SchwepkerCHFerrellOCIngramTN. The influence of ethical climate and ethical conflict on role stress in the sales force. J Acad Mark Sci1997; 25: 99–108.
60.
KunduSCKumarSGahlawatN. Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment. Manag Res Rev2019; 42(5): 605–624.
61.
DienerEDEmmonsRALarsenRJ, et al.The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess1985; 49(1): 71–75.
62.
GargNSinghP. Work engagement as a mediator between subjective well-being and work-and-health outcomes. Manag Res Rev2020; 43(6): 735–752.
63.
BuilIMartínezEMatuteJ. Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. Int J Hospit Manag2019; 77: 64–75.
64.
HairJJFMatthewsLMMatthewsRL, et al.PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis2017; 1(2): 107–123.
65.
BaronRMKennyDA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol1986; 51(6): 1173–1182.
66.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol2012; 63(1): 539–569.
67.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci2015; 43: 115–135.
68.
HairJFSarstedtMRingleCM, et al.An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci2012; 40: 414–433.
69.
HuLTBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model: A Multidiscip J1999; 6(1): 1–55.
70.
AlNuaimiBKKhanMAjmalMM. The role of big data analytics capabilities in greening e-procurement: A higher order PLS-SEM analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 169: 120808.
71.
SleimiMOkechukwu LawrenceE. Do employee attitudes mediate the relationship between strategic human resource management practices and organizational effectiveness? A SEM based investigation using SMART-PLS software. BEH - Business and Economic Horizons2017; 13(1): 42–59.
72.
SarstedtMRingleCMSmithD, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy2014; 5(1): 105–115.
73.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al.When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev2019; 31(1): 2–4.
74.
RahiS. Investigating the role of employee psychological well-being and psychological empowerment with relation to work engagement and sustainable employability. International Journal of Ethics and Systems2022; 38(2): 266–285.
75.
AkkoçİTüreAArunK, et al.Mediator effects of psychological empowerment between ethical climate and innovative culture on performance and innovation in nurses. J Nurs Manag2022; 30(7): 2324–2334.
76.
SatriaNKustiawanU. The role of job insecurity and high commitment work system on employee well being. Journal Cafeteria2023; 4(1): 25–39.
77.
BanerjeeG. Psychological empowerment and subjective well being mediating role of job and career satisfaction.
78.
Santiago-TornerC. Ethical climate and creativity: The moderating role of work autonomy and the mediator role of intrinsic motivation. cuadernosgestion2023; 23(2): 93–105.
79.
GuedesDPMissakaMS. Sport participation motives of young Brazilian judo athletes. Motriz: Rev Educ Fis2015; 21: 84–91.
