Globalization is a blind spot in stakeholder theory and this undermines its explanatory power and usefulness to managers in global corporations. In this paper we build on Edward Freeman and colleagues’ attempts to construct divergent stories about how to create value for the corporation and its stakeholders when developing a stakeholder theory that is more sensitive to globalization. We achieve this by highlighting two particular challenges that globalization brings to stakeholder theory. The first challenge is to acknowledge new power relations (sub-political movements, new forms of bureaucracy and hierarchy) and the second is to acknowledge new dimensions of responsibility (a political responsibility). In the paper we relate our developments of stakeholder theory to two previously published case studies.
Anderson, S., & Cavanagh, J. ( 2000). The rise of corporate global power. Washington DC: Institute for Policy Studies.
3.
Bauman, Z. ( 1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Bauman, Z. ( 1999). In search of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
Bauman, Z. ( 2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Beck, U. ( 1992).Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
7.
Beck, U. ( 1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8.
Beck, U. ( 1996). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
Beck, U. ( 2005). Power in the global age: A new global political economy . Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Beck, U. ( 2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
Benhabib, S. ( 2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
Berry, G.R. ( 2003). Organizing against multinational corporate power in Cancer Alley. Organization & Environment, 16 (1), 3-33.
13.
Boje, D.M. ( 2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: SAGE.
14.
Castells, M. ( 2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society . British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1), 5-24.
15.
Clegg, S.R. ( 1989). Frameworks of power. London: SAGE.
16.
Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. ( 2006) Power and organizations. London: SAGE.
17.
Czarniawska, B. ( 1999). Writing management: Organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Czarniawska, B. ( 2001). Having hope in paralogy. Human Relations , 54 (1), 13-21.
19.
Djelic, M-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Du Gay, P. ( 2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics . London: SAGE.
21.
Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E., & Liedtka, J. ( 2006). Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16 (1), 23-42.
22.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R.E. ( 1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions . Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (4), 409-22.
25.
Freeman, R.E. ( 1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 233-6.
26.
Freeman, R.E. ( 2005). Stakeholder theory. In P. H. Werhane & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of management: Business ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
27.
Freeman, R.E. ( 2008). Ending the so-called ‘Friedman-Freeman’ debate . Business Ethics Quarterly, 18 (2), 153-190.
28.
Freeman, R.E., & McVae, J. ( 2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. Hitt, E. Freeman & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
29.
Freeman, R.E., & Phillips, R.A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (3), 331-349.
30.
Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., & Parmar, B. ( 2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15 (3), 364-369.
31.
Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., & Wicks, A.C. ( 2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
Friedman, T.L. ( 2007). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin Books.
33.
Gabriel, Y. ( 2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
34.
Gioia, D.A. ( 1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 228-232.
35.
Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Eds.) (2007). Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Kallinikos, J. ( 2004). The social foundations of the bureaucratic order. Organization, 11 (1), 13-36.
37.
Kuper, A. ( 2007). Reconstructing global governance: Eight innovations. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies . Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. ( 1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who or what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853-886.
39.
Orts, E.W., & Strudler, A. ( 2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory . Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2), 215-233.
40.
Phillips, R.A. ( 1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7 (1), 51-66.
41.
Phillips, R.A. ( 2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
42.
Phillips, R.A., Freeman, R.E., & Wicks, A.C. ( 2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4), 479-502.
43.
Rawls, J. ( 1973). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Rawls, J. ( 1999). The law of peoples: With ‘the ideal of public reason revisited’. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Rhenman, E. ( 1968). Industrial democracy and industrial management: A critical essay on the meanings and implications of industrial democracy. Assen/London: Van Gorcum/ Tavistock.
46.
Roddick, A. ( 2000). Business as unusual: The journey of Anita Roddick and the Body Shop. London: Thorsons .
47.
Rorty, R. ( 1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Sandberg, J. ( 2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18 (2), 213-232.
49.
Sen, A. ( 2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books.
50.
Sennett, R. ( 1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: W.W. Norton.
51.
Sennett, R. ( 2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
52.
Shell (2010). http://www.shell.com/nigeria (last accessed 20 January 2010).
53.
Shintech (2010) http://www.shintechla.com /(last accessed 20 January 2010).
54.
Singer, P. ( 2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
55.
Stieb, J.A. ( 2009) Assessing Freeman’s stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (3), 401-414.
56.
Tsoukas, H. ( 1999). David and Goliath in the risk society: Making sense of the conflict between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea. Organization, 6 (3), 499-528.
57.
Urry, J. ( 2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
58.
Walsh, J.P. ( 2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management . Academy of Management Review, 30 (2), 426-438.
59.
Wheeler, D., Fabig, H. & Boele, R. ( 2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 297-318.
60.
Wicks, A.C., & Freeman, R.E. ( 1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science , 9 (2), 123-140.
61.
Wicks, A.C., Gilbert Jr, D.R., & Freeman, R.E. ( 1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept . Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (4), 475-497.
62.
Young, I.M. ( 2004). Responsibility and global labor justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (4), 365-388.
