This article examines some of the processes by which power constitutes calculability and, in so doing, shapes the construction of markets. We combine insights from performativity studies about calculability with Lukes’ ‘radical view of power’ to investigate how multiple facets of power are mobilized to influence the creation and activities of calculative agencies in the process of market construction. An in-depth longitudinal study of the French socially responsible investment market shows how organizations acting as calculative agencies become sites of power through calculability. We identify how power is exercised over, through and against these calculative agencies by a variety of actors in order to build their position in the socially responsible investment market. Our results complement the broader question of the ‘government of economic life’ by showing how micro-level power games interact with the macro-politics of market building through calculative agencies. In so doing, our article sheds light on neglected aspects of the changing geopolitics of calculative power in market construction and suggests approaching ‘calculability as politics’ when studying the construction of markets.
AcquierA.AggeriF. (2007). The development of a CSR industry: Legitimacy and feasibility as the two pillars of the institutionalization process. In den HondF.De BakkerF.NeergaardP. (Eds.), Managing corporate social responsibility in action: talking, doing and measuring (pp. 149–165). London, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
2.
AhrneG.AspersP.BrunssonN. (2015). The organisation of markets. Organization Studies, 36, 7–27.
3.
ArjalièsD.-L. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 57–78.
4.
BachrachP.BaratzM. S. (1970). Power and poverty: theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
BeunzaD.GarudR. (2007). Security analysts as frame makers. In CallonM.MilloY.MuniesaF. (Eds.), Market devices (pp. 13–39). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
BrèsL.GondJ. P. (2014). The visible hand of consultants in the construction of the markets for virtue: Translating issues, negotiating boundaries and enacting responsive regulations. Human Relations, 67, 1347–1382.
7.
ÇalışkanK.CallonM. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39, 1–32.
8.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 234–263). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
CallonM. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In CallonM. (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 1–57). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
10.
CallonM. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In MacKenzieD.MuniesaF.SiuL. (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CallonM. (2009). Civilizing market: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34, 535–548.
12.
CallonM. (2013). Qu’est-ce qu’un agencements marchand? In CallonM.AkrichM.Dubuisson-QuellierS.GrandclémentC.HennionA.LatourB.MallardA.. (Eds.), Sociologie des agencements marchands (pp. 324–440). Textes choisis. Paris: Presses des Mines
ChatterjiA.DurandR.LevineD.TouboulS. (2015). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors, and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 11August2015. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2407.
16.
ChelliM.GendronY. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 187–203.
17.
CleggS. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London, UK: SAGE.
18.
CleggS. R.CourpassonD.PhillipsN. (2006). Power and organization. London, UK: SAGE.
19.
CochoyF.GiraudeauM.McFallL. (2010). Performativity, economics and politics: An overview. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 139–146.
20.
CourpassonD. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination. Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies, 21, 141–161.
21.
CowtonC. (1999). Playing by the rules: Ethical criteria at an ethical investment fund. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8, 60–69.
22.
CrifoP.MottisN. (2013). Socially responsible investment in France. Business & Society. Epub ahead of print 8September2013. DOI: 10.1177/0007650313500216.
23.
DahlR. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2, 201–215.
24.
DéjeanF. (2005). L’Investissement socialement responsable—Etude du cas français. Paris, France: Vuibert.
25.
DéjeanF.GondJ.-P.LecaB. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging Industry. Human Relations, 57, 741–764.
26.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
27.
Eurosif. (2012). Eurosif European Survey 2012. Retrieved from http://eurosif.org
28.
Eurosif. (2014). Eurosif European Survey 2014. Retrieved from http://eurosif.org
29.
FlemingP.SpicerS. (2007). Contesting the corporation: struggle, power and resistance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
30.
FlemingP.SpicerA. (2014). Power in management and organization science. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 237–298.
31.
FligsteinN. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
FligsteinN. (1996). Markets as politics: A political cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological review, 61, 656–673.
33.
FligsteinN. (2001). The architecture of markets: an economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
FoucaultM. (1978 [1975]). Discipline and punish: the birth of prison. New York, NY: Random House.
35.
FoucaultM. (1979). On governmentality. I & C, 6, 5–22.
36.
FourcadeM. (2007). Theories of market and theories of society. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1015–1034.
37.
GiamporcaroS. (2006). L’investissement socialement responsable entre l’offre et la demande: analyse et enjeux de la construction sociale d’une épargne politique (PhD dissertation). Sociology, University René Descartes-La Sorbonne, Éditions Universitaires Européennes2010.
38.
GondJ.-P. (2006). Contribution à l’étude du concept de performance sociétale de l’entreprise. Fondements théoriques, construction sociale et impact financier (PhD dissertation). Management Sciences, University Toulouse 1 – Sciences Sociales, Toulouse, France.
39.
GondJ.-P.BoxenbaumE. (2013). The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Québec. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 707–721.
40.
GondJ.-P.CraneA. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm?Business and Society, 49, 677–703.
41.
GondJ.-P.CabantousL.HardyN.LearmonthM. (2015). What do we mean by performativity in organization studies? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews. Epub ahead of print 7July2015. DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12074
HolmP.NielseonC.-F. (2007). Framing fish, making markets: The construction of individual transferable quota (ITQs). In CallonM.MilloY.MuniesaF. (Eds.), Market devices (pp. 173–195). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
44.
JurvaleC.LewisA. (2009). Identifying impediments to SRI in Europe: A review of the practitioner and academic literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 285–310.
45.
KrippnerG. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3, 173–208.
46.
KrippnerG. R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: the political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
KurtzL. (2008). Socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. In CraneA.MattenD.McWilliamsA.MoonJ.SiegelD. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 249–267). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Le Monde Diplomatique. (2002). La grande illusion des placements éthiques. November29.
49.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
50.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
MacKenzieD. A. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emissions rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34, 440–455.
53.
MacKenzieD. A.MilloY. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 107–145.
54.
MillerD. (2002). Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society, 31, 218–233.
55.
MillerP. (1992). Accounting and objectivity, the invention of calculative selves and calculative spaces. Annals of Scholarship, 9, 61–86.
56.
MillerP.PowerM. (2013). Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 557–605.
57.
MillerP.RoseN. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19, 1–31.
58.
MorganG. (2008). Market formation and governance in international financial markets: The case of OTC derivatives. Human Relations, 61, 637–660.
59.
Novethic. (2003). L’indicateur novethic (Novethic Barometer). Retrieved from http://www.novethic.fr
60.
Novethic. (2007). L’indicateur novethic (Novethic Barometer). Retrieved from http://www.novethic.fr
61.
OverdevestC. (2011). Towards a more pragmatic sociology of markets. Theory and Society, 40, 533–552.
62.
Pénalva-IcherÉ. (2007). Réseaux et régulation d’un marché financier « socialement responsable » : en attendant la concurrence. (Doctoral dissertation, Lille 1).
63.
PfefferJ. (1981). Power and organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
64.
Politis (2004). L’éthique touche le fonds. December1.
65.
PolanyiK. (1957) Economy as instituted process. In PolanyiK.ArensebergC. M.PearsonH. (Eds.), Trade and market in the early empires: economies in history and theory (pp. 243–270). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
66.
PoonM. (2009). From new deals institutions to capital markets: Commercial consumer risk scores and the making of mortgage finance. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34, 654–674.
67.
PowerM. (2004). Counting, control and calculation: Reflections on measuring and management. Human Relations, 57, 765–783.
68.
Que Choisir (2003). Vous avez dit éthique ?April1.
69.
ReineckeJ.ManningS.von HagenO. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33, 789–812.
70.
Social Investment Forum (2010). Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.ussif.org/
71.
SlagerR.GondJ.-P.MoonJ. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33, 763–790.
72.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
73.
TV Show 24 Heures (2005). Des fonds éthiques pas vraiment éthiques. Broadcasted February, 2005.
74.
Van HoyweghenI. (2014). On the politics of calculative devices: Performing life insurance markets. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7, 334–352.
75.
VogelD. J. (2005). The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings.
76.
VollmerH.MennickenA.PredaA. (2009). Tracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 619–637.
77.
VosselmanE. (2014). The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: Towards a relational ontology of management accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44, 181–203.
78.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
79.
ZarlowskiP. (2007). Marketing corporate social responsibility in a national context: The case of social rating agencies in France. In den HondF.de BakkerF.NeergaardP. (Eds.), Managing corporate social responsibility in action: talking, doing and measuring (pp. 167–186). London, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
