In recent decades, as worldwide attention to corporate responsibility increased, the global corporate responsibility (GCR) movement did not converge on a singular governance model nor hybridize into myriad country-specific models. The movement, rather, bifurcated into onerous certification frameworks and more lax reporting frameworks. We examine this ‘governance divide’ in the GCR movement by investigating the cross-national diffusion of seven core GCR frameworks. We adopt a glocalization perspective that conceptualizes a vertical nesting of local and global contexts. Our cross-national quantitative analyses suggest that, while linkages to global culture have encouraged business participation in all GCR frameworks, power dependencies related to international trade and domestic factors related to effectiveness of local governance institutions have contributed to divergent diffusion patterns across reporting and certification frameworks. We discuss these findings in relation to several organizational perspectives and note their implications for further research on corporate responsibility.
AguileraR. V.Cuervo-CazurraA. (2004). Code of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger?Organization Studies, 25, 415–443.
2.
AlterK. J.MeunierS. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 13–24.
3.
AßländerM. S.GösslingT.SeeleP. (2016). Business ethics in a European perspective: A case for unity in diversity?Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 633–639.
4.
BartleyT. (2003). Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Politics & Society, 31, 433–464.
5.
BartleyT. (2005). Corporate accountability and the privatization of labor standards: Struggles over codes of conduct in the apparel industry. Research in Political Sociology, 14, 211–244.
6.
BartleyT. (2007a). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297–351.
7.
BartleyT. (2007b). Standards for sweatshops: The power and limits of club theory for explaining voluntary labor standards programs. In PotoskiM.PrakashA. (Eds.), Voluntary programs: A club theory approach (pp. 107–132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BebbingtonJ.KirkE. A.LarrinagaC. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 78–94.
9.
BeckfieldJ. (2003). Inequality in the world polity: The structure of international organization. American Sociological Review, 68, 401–424.
10.
BehnamM.MacLeanT. L. (2011). Where Is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 45–72.
11.
BerlinerD.PrakashA. (2015). ‘Bluewashing’ the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. Policy Studies Journal, 43, 115–138.
12.
BiggeD. M. (2004). Bring on the bluewash: A social constructivst argument against using Nike v. Kasky to attack the UN Global Compact. International Legal Perspectives, 14, 6–21.
13.
BloomfieldH. S. (1998). Sweating the international garment industry: A critique of the presidential task force’s workplace codes of conduct and monitoring system. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 22, 567.
14.
BoliJ.ThomasG. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62, 171–190.
15.
BoyleE. H.KimM.LonghoferW. (2015). Abortion liberalization in world society, 1960–2009. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 882–913.
16.
BrammerS. J.WilliamsG. A.ZinkinJ. (2006). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229–240.
17.
BromleyP.MeyerJ. W. (2015). Hyper-organization: Global organizational expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483–530.
19.
BrownD.KnudsenJ. S. (2013). Domestic institutions and market pressures as drivers of corporate social responsibility: Company initiatives in Denmark and the UK. Political Studies, 63, 181–201.
20.
BuhariD. (2010). World society and conflict. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies, 2, 164–168.
21.
BurgoonB.FransenL. (2017). Support for ethical consumerism and welfare states in the global economy: Complements or substitutes?Global Policy, 8, 42–55.
22.
CaoX.PrakashA. (2010). Growing exports by signaling product quality: Trade competition and the cross- national diffusion of ISO 9000 quality standards. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 111–135.
Chase-DunnC. (1999). Globalization: A World-systems perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research, 2, 187–215.
25.
ColeW. M. (2017). World polity or world society? Delineating the statist and societal dimensions of the global institutional system. International Sociology, 32, 86–104.
26.
DavisC. L. (2009). Overlapping institutions in trade policy. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 25–31.
27.
DroriG. S.HöllererM. A.WalgenbachP. (2014). Unpacking the glocalization of organization: From term, to theory, to analysis. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1, 85–99.
28.
EdelmanL. B.UggenC.ErlangerH. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology. 105, 406–454.
29.
FavottoA.KollmanK.BernhagenP. (2016). Engaging firms: The global organisational field for corporate social responsibility and national varieties of capitalism. Policy and Society, 35, 13–27.
30.
FrankD. J.HironakaA.SchoferE. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96–116.
31.
FrankD. J.LonghoferW.SchoferE. (2007). World society, NGOs and environmental policy reform in Asia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48, 275–295.
32.
FrankD. J.RobinsonK. J.OlesenJ. (2011). The global expansion of environmental education in universities. Comparative Education Review, 55, 546–573.
33.
FreimannJ.WaltherM. (2002). The impacts of corporate environmental management systems: A comparison between EMAS and ISO 14001. Greener Management International, 36, 91–103.
34.
GilbertD. U.RascheA.WaddockS. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 23–44.
35.
GöbbelsM.JonkerJ. (2003). AA1000 and SA8000 compared: A systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 54–58.
36.
GraysonD.NelsonJ. (2013). Corporate responsibility coalitions: The past, present, and future of alliances for sustainable capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
GreenhillB.MosleyL.PrakashA. (2009). Trade-based diffusion of labor rights: A panel study, 1986–2002. American Political Science Review, 103, 669–690.
38.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
39.
Hafner-BurtonE. M. (2009). The power politics of regime complexity: Human rights trade conditionality in Europe. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 33–37.
40.
Hafner-BurtonE. M.TsutsuiK. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1373–1411.
41.
HilbeJ. M. (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HironakaA. (2014). Greening the globe: World society and environmental change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
JacksonG.ApostolakouA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute?Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394.
44.
JamaliD. (2010). MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 617–640.
45.
KaplanR. (2015). Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of ‘corporate responsibility’ in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 13, 125–155.
46.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3, 220–246.
47.
KellG.LevinD. (2003). The Global Compact network: An historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108, 151–181.
48.
KeohaneR.VictorD. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23.
49.
KindermanD. (2012). ‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 29–57.
50.
KindermanD. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: Institutional ambiguity, economic crises, business legitimacy and bureaucratic politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, 701–720.
51.
KindermanD. (2015). Explaining the rise of national corporate responsibility: The role of global frameworks, world culture, and corporate interests. In TsutsuiK.LimA. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 107–146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
KindermanD.LutterM. (2018). Explaining the growth of CSR within OECD countries: The role of institutional legitimacy in resolving the institutional mirror vs. substitute debate. Discussion Paper 18/2, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln.
53.
KingB. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 395–421.
LiangH.MarquisC.RenneboogL.SunS. L. (2014). Speaking of Corporate Social Responsibility. Working Paper No. 412/2014, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, European Corporate Governance Institute.
56.
LiangH.RenneboogL. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Finance, 72, 853–910.
57.
LimA.TsutsuiK. (2012). Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. American Sociological Review, 77, 69–98.
58.
LockeR. M.AmengualM.ManglaA. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37, 319–351.
59.
LockeR. M.RissingB. A.PalT. (2013). Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51, 519–552.
60.
MarensR. (2012). Generous in victory? American managerial autonomy, labour relations and the invention of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 59–84.
61.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.
62.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.
63.
MeyerJ. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.
64.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. M.RamirezF. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181.
65.
MeyerR. E.HöllererM. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A Topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1241–1262.
66.
MidttunA.GautesenK.GjølbergM. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6, 369–385.
67.
MosleyL.UnoS. (2007). Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 923–948.
68.
MueckenbergerU.JastramS. (2010). Transnational norm-building networks and the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 223–239.
69.
PigmanG. A. (2007). The World Economic Forum: A multi-stakeholder approach to global governance. London: Routledge.
70.
PopeS.LimA. (2017). International organizations as mobilizing structures: World CSR associations and their disparate impacts on members’ CSR practices, 2000–2016. Social Forces, 95, 1725–1755.
71.
PopeS.MeyerJ. W. (2015). The global corporate organization. Management and Organization Review, 11, 173–177.
72.
PopeS.MeyerJ. W. (2016). Local variation in world society: Six characteristics of global diffusion. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 3, 280–305.
73.
PotoskiM.PrakashA. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 235–248.
74.
PrakashA.PotoskiM. (2006). Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 350–364.
75.
RascheA. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards: The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 192–205.
76.
RaustialaK.VictorD. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58, 277–309.
77.
RiisgaardL. (2009). Global value chains, labor organization and private social standards: Lessons from East African cut flower industries. World Development, 37, 326–340.
78.
RobertsonR. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In FeatherstoneM.LashS.RobertsonR. (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–54). London: SAGE Publications.
79.
Rodriguez-GaravitoC. A. (2005). Global governance and labor rights: Codes of conduct and anti-sweatshop struggles in global apparel factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Politics & Society, 33, 203–333.
80.
RoudometofV. (2016). Glocalization: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
81.
RuggieJ. G. (2003). Taking embedded liberalism global: The corporate connection. In HeldD.Koenig-ArchibugiM. (Eds.), Taming globalization: Frontiers of governance (pp. 93–129). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
82.
Sagafi-NejadT. (2008). The UN and transnational corporations: From code of conduct to Global Compact. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
83.
SchoferE.HironakaA. (2005). The effects of world society on environmental protection outcomes. Social Forces, 84, 25–47.
84.
SchoferE.HironakaA.FrankD. J.LonghoferW. (2012). Sociological institutionalism and world society. In AmentaE.NashK.ScottA. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 57–68). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
85.
SegerlundL. (2010). Making corporate social responsibility a global concern. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
86.
ShanahanS.KhagramS. (2006). Dynamics of corporate responsibility. In DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W.HwangH. (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 196–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
SmithJ. (2010). Power, interests, and the United Nations Global Compact. In PorterT.RonitK. (Eds.), Globalization, private sector authority, and new models of democratic policy-making (pp. 89–109). New York: State University of New York Press.
88.
StetterS. (Ed.) (2007). Territorial conflicts in world society: Modern systems theory, international relations and conflict studies. New York: Routledge.
89.
SuarezD.BromleyP. (2012). Professionalizing a global social movement: Universities and human rights. American Journal of Education, 118, 253–280.
90.
SuarezD.BromleyP. (2016). Institutional theories and levels of analysis: History, diffusion, and translation. In SchriewerJ. (Ed.), World culture re-contextualized: Meaning constellations and path-dependencies in comparative and international education research (pp. 139–159). New York: Routledge.
91.
UttingP. (2005). Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Development and Practice, 15, 375–388.
92.
UttingP.ZammitA. (2008). United Nations-business partnerships: Good intentions and contradictory agendas. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 39–56.
93.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49, 68–87.
94.
WhitehouseL. (2003). Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship and the Global Compact: A new approach to regulating corporate social power?Global Social Policy, 3, 299–318.
95.
YuX. (2008). Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labor standards: A case study of Reebok’s athletic footwear supplier factory in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 513–529.
