A fundamental task for sociology is to uncover the mechanisms that produce and reproduce social inequalities. While status characteristics theory is the favored account of how social status contributes independently to the maintenance of inequality, it hinges on an unobserved construct, expectation states, in the middle of the causal chain between status and behavior. Efforts to test the mediation mechanism have been complicated by the implicit, often unconscious, nature of status expectations. To solve this “black box” problem, we offer a new conceptualization and research approach that capitalizes on the accuracy and precision of neurological measurement to shed new light on the biasing role of expectations in the status–behavior relationship. Results from an experimental study provide a unique illustration of ways in which social status is inscribed in the brain and how, in turn, these inscriptions are related to behavioral inequalities that emerge during interaction.
BarchasPatricia R.JoseWilliam S.IIPayneBarbara A.HarrisWilliam A.1984. “An Attention-Regulating Function of Social Hierarchies: High Status, Attention, and the CNV Brain Wave.” Pp. 133–46 in Social Hierarchies: Essays toward a Sociophysiological Perspective, edited by BarchasP. R.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
2.
BaumgartenT. J.SchnitzlerAlfonsLangeJoachim. 2016. “Prestimulus Alpha Power Influences Tactile Temporal Perceptual Discrimination and Confidence in Decisions.” Cerebral Cortex26:891–903.
3.
BergerJoseph. 2014. “The Standardized Experimental Situation in Expectation States Research: Notes on History, Uses, and Special Features.” Pp. 269–94 in Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by WebsterM.Jr.SellJ.San Diego: Academic Press.
4.
BergerJosephCohenBernard P.ZelditchMorrisJr.1966. “Status Characteristics and Expectation States.” Pp. 29–46 in Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 1, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr.AndersonB.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
BergerJosephCohenBernard P.ZelditchMorrisJr.1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review37:241–55.
6.
BergerJosephConnerThomas L.1974. “Performance Expectations and Behavior in Small Groups: A Revised Formulation.” Pp. 85–109 in Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program, edited by BergerJ.ConnerT. L.FisekM. H.Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
7.
BergerJoseph, M.FisekHamitNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
8.
BlackhartGinette C.BrownKelly E.ClarkTravisPierceDonald L.ShellKelsye. 2012. “Assessing the Adequacy of Postexperimental Inquiries in Deception Research and the Factors That Promote Participant Honesty.” Behavioral Research Methods44:24–40.
BruzzoneLorenzoPrietoD. Fernandez. 2000. “Automatic Analysis of the Difference Image for Unsupervised Change Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing38:1171–82.
11.
BurgoonJudee K.JonesStephen B.1976. “Toward a Theory of Personal Space Expectations and Their Violations.” Human Communication Research2:131–46.
12.
CohenMike X.2014. Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
DavisC. ErvinHaufJessica D.WuD. QiangEverhartD. Erik. 2011. “Brain Function with Complex Decision Making Using Electroencephalography.” International Journal of Psychophysiology79:175–83.
14.
DavisJames A.1994. “What’s Wrong with Sociology?” Sociological Forum9:179–97.
15.
DelormeArnaudMakeigScott. 2004. “EEGLAB: An Open Source Toolbox for Analysis of Single-Trial EEG Dynamics.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods134:9–21.
DippongJoseph. 2015. “Priming Effects and Performance Expectations in Mixed-Sex Task Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly78:387–98.
18.
DriskellJames E.MullenBrian. 1990. “Status, Expectations, and Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review and Test of the Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin16:541–53.
19.
FoddyMargaretSmithsonMichael. 1999. “Can Gender Inequalities Be Eliminated?” Social Psychology Quarterly62:307–24.
20.
FrickRobert W.1995. “Accepting the Null Hypothesis.” Memory & Cognition23:132–38.
21.
GarfinkelHarold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethdology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
GeukesSebastianHusterRené J.WollbrinkAndreasJunghöferMarkusZwitserloodPienie, et al. 2013. “A Large N400 but No BOLD Effect: Comparing Source Activations of Semantic Priming in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI.” PLOS ONE8:1–11.
23.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubelday.
24.
GrossNeil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review74:358–79.
25.
HayesAndrew F.2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press.
26.
HedstromPeterSwedbergRichard. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 1–31 in Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedstromP.SwedbergR.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HolroydClay B.ColesMichael G. H.2002. “The Neural Basis of Human Error Processing: Reinforcement Learning, Dopamine, and the Error-Related Negativity.” Psychological Review109:679–709.
28.
HolroydClay B.NieuwenhuisSanderYeungNickCohenJonathon D.2003. “Errors in Reward Prediction Are Reflected in the Event-Related Brain Potential.” Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology14:2481–84.
29.
HusterRené J.DebenerStefanEicheleTomHermannChristop S.2012. “Methods of Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review.” Journal of Neuroscience32:6053–60.
30.
JamesRita M.1959. “Status and Competence of Jurors.” American Journal of Sociology64:563–70.
31.
KalkhoffWill. 2005. “Collective Validation in Multi-actor Task Groups: The Effects of Status Differentiation.” Social Psychology Quarterly68:57–74.
32.
KalkhoffWillThyeShane R.2006. “Expectation States Theory and Research: New Observations from Meta-analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research35:219–49.
33.
KarlsonKristian BerntHolmAndersBreenRichard. 2012. “Comparing Regression Coefficients between Same-Sample Nested Models Using Logit and Probit: A New Method.” Sociological Methodology42:286–313.
34.
KennyDavid A.KashyDeborah A.BolgerNiall. 1998. “Data Analysis in Social Psychology.” Pp. 233–68 in The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 4th ed., edited by GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG.New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
KiatJohn E.CheadleJacob E.2018. “Tick-Tock Goes the Croc: A High-Density EEG Study of Risk-Reactivity and Binge-Drinking.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience13:656–63.
36.
KubanekJan, N.HillJeremySnyderLawrence H.SchalkGerwin. 2015. “Cortical Alpha Activity Predicts the Confidence in an Impending Decision.” Frontiers in Neuroscience9:1–15.
37.
LuckSteven J.2014. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
LundebergMary A.FoxPaul W.PunćcohaŕJudith. 1994. “Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments.” Journal of Educational Psychology86:114–21.
39.
MakeigScottDebenerStefanOntonJulieDelormeArnaud2004. “Mining Event-Related Brain Dynamics.” Trends in Cognitive Science8:204–10.
40.
Marco-PallaresJosepCucurellDavidMünteThomas F.StrienNadineRodriguez-FornellsAntoni. 2011. “On the Number of Trials Needed for a Stable Feedback-Related Negativity.” Psychophysiology48:852–60.
41.
MaroisRenéYiDo-JoonChunMarvin M.2004. “The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink.” Neuron41:465–72.
42.
MelamedDavidAbromaviciuteJurgita. 2013. “The Implications of Social Neuroscience for Expectation States Theories.” Sociology Compass7:255–64.
43.
MelamedDavidKalkhoffWillHanSiqiLiXiangrui. 2017. “The Neural Bases of Status-Based Influence.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World3:1–10.
44.
MelamedDavidSavageScott V.2013. “Predicting Social Influence with Faction Sizes and Relative Status.” Social Science Research42:1346–56.
45.
MelamedDavidSavageScott V.2016. “Status, Faction Sizes, and Social Influence: Testing the Theoretical Mechanism.” American Journal of Sociology122:201–32.
46.
MognonAndreaJovicichJorgeBruzzoneLorenzoBuiattiMarco. 2011. “ADJUST: An Automatic EEG Artifact Detector Based on the Joint Use of Spatial and Temporal Features.” Psychophysiology48:229–40.
47.
MooreJames C.Jr.1965. “Development of the Spatial Judgment Experimental Task.” Technical Report 15, Laboratory for Social Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
48.
MooreJames C.Jr.1968. “Status and Influence in Small Group Interactions.” Sociometry31:47–63.
49.
PivikR. T.BroughtonR. J.CoppolaR.DavidsonR. J.FoxN., et al. 1993. “Guidelines for the Recording and Quantitative Analysis of Electroencephalographic Activity in Research Contexts.” Psychophysiology30:547–58.
50.
PizzagalliDiego A.2007. “Electroencephalography and High-Density Electrophysiological Source Localization.” Pp. 56–84 in Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed., edited by CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G.New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
PlassmannHilkeZoëga RamsøyThomasMilosavljevicMilica. 2012. “Branding the Brain: A Critical Review and Outlook.” Journal of Consumer Psychology22:18–36.
52.
RavlinElizabeth C.ThomasDavid C.2005. “Status and Stratification Processes in Organization Life.” Journal of Management31:966–87.
53.
ReskinBarbara F.2003. “Including Mechanisms in our Models of Ascriptive Inequality.” American Sociological Review68:1–21.
RidgewayCecilia L.1981. “Nonconformity, Competence and Influence in Groups: A Test of Two Theories.” American Sociological Review46:333–47.
56.
RidgewayCecilia L.2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review79:1–16.
57.
RidgewayCecilia L.WalkerHenry A.1995. “Status Structures.” Pp. 281–310 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by CoolK. S.FineG. A.HouseJ. S.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
SamahaJasonGosseriesOliviaPostleBradley R.2017. “Distinct Oscillatory Frequencies Underlie Excitability of Human Occipital and Parietal Cortex.” The Journal of Neuroscience37:2824–33.
59.
SavageScott V.MelamedDavidVincentAaron. 2013. “The Role of Uncertainty in Social Influence.” Advances in Group Processes30:109–29.
60.
SchneiderJoachimCookKaren. 1995. “Status Inconsistency and Gender.” Small Group Research26:372–99.
61.
SunSaiYuRongjun. 2014. “The Feedback Related Negativity Encodes Both Social Rejection and Explicit Social Expectancy Violation.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8:1–9.
62.
TalloenWouter. 2015. “Effect Size Measures for Mediation Models: A Critical Evaluation of K2.” Master’s thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
63.
ThyeShane R.2000. “Reliability in Experimental Sociology.” Social Forces78:1277–1309.
64.
TillyCharles. 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science4:21–41.
65.
TomasiD.CaparelliE. C.ChangL.ErnstT.2005. “fMRI Acoustic Noise Alters Brain Activation During Working Memory Tasks.” Neuroimage27:377–86.
66.
WagnerDavid G.1988. “Status Violations: Toward an Expectation States Theory of the Social Control of Status Deviance.” Pp. 110–22 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited by WebsterM.Jr.FoschiM.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67.
WagnerDavid G.2007. “Symbolic Interactionism and Expectation States Theory: Similarities and Differences.” Sociological Focus40:121–37.
68.
WebsterMurrayJr.RashotteLisa Slattery. 2010. “Behavior, Expectations, and Status.” Social Forces88:1021–50.
69.
WenZhonglinFanXitao. 2015. “Monotonicity of Effect Sizes: Questioning Kappa-Squared as Mediation Effect Size Measure.” Psychological Methods20:193–203.
70.
WoodmanGeoffrey F.2010. “A Brief Introduction to the Use of Event-Related Potentials in Studies of Perception and Attention.” Attention, Perception & Psychophysics72:2031–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
