Gender differences in wage negotiations have been offered as a popular explanation for why the gender gap in pay persists in the United States. In this study, we use data from an artificial wage negotiation experiment (N = 307) to examine the relationship between gender and wage negotiations and to test whether gender-role attitudes moderate this relationship. We find that gender-role attitudes moderate how gender influences the decision to negotiate, but not the outcomes of negotiations, and that forced negotiations do not lead to additional gains for women regardless of their gender-role attitudes. We conclude with a discussion of implications and directions for future research.
AmanatullahEmily T.MorrisMichael W.2010. “Negotiating Gender Roles: Gender Differences in Assertive Negotiating Are Mediated by Women’s Fear of Backlash and Attenuated When Negotiating on Behalf of Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98:256–67.
2.
AndersonSteffenErtacSedaJohn A. ListUri GneezyMaximianoSandra. 2018. “On the Cultural Basis of Gender Differences in Negotiation.” Experimental Economics21:757–78.
3.
ArtzBenjaminGoodallAmanda H.OswaldAndrew J.2018. “Do Women Ask?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review57:611–36.
4.
AuspurgKatrinHinzThomasSauerCarsten. 2017. “Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments.” American Sociological Review82:179–210.
5.
BabcockLindaLascheverS.2003. Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BaberKristine M.TuckerCorinna J.2006. “The Social Roles Questionnaire: A New Approach to Measure Attitudes toward Gender.” Sex Roles54:459–67.
7.
BarrosoAmandaBrownAnna. 2021. “Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Held Steady in 2020.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
8.
BemSandra. 1981. Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2007. “The Gender Pay Gap.” Economists’ Voice4:1–6.
CardDavidCardosoAna RuteKlinePatrick. 2016. “Bargaining, Sorting, and the Gender Wage Gap: Quantifying the Impact of Firms on the Relative Pay of Women.” Quarterly Journal of Economics131:633–86.
12.
ChaYounjooWeedenKim A.2014. “Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages.” American Sociological Review79:457–84.
13.
ChiuChi-YueGelfandMichele J.YamagishiToshioShteynbergGarriyWanChing. 2010. “Intersubjective Culture: The Role of Intersubjective Perceptions in Cross-Cultural Research.” Perspectives on Psychological Science5:482–93.
14.
Christie-MizellC. Andre. 2006. “The Effects of Traditional Family and Gender Ideology on Earnings: Race and Gender Differences.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues27:48–71.
15.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112:1297–338.
16.
CorrigallElizabeth A.KonradAlison M.2007. “Gender Role Attitudes and Careers: A Longitudinal Study.” Sex Roles56:847–55.
17.
CotterDavidHermsenJoan H.VannemanReeve. 2011. “The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes from 1977 to 2008.” American Journal of Sociology117:259–89.
18.
DavisShannon N.GreensteinTheodore N.2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology35:87–105.
19.
DemirovićMelisaRobbinsBlaine G.2022. “The Norm of Wage Negotiations in the United States.” Socius8:1–19.
20.
DittrichMarcusKnabeAndreasLeipoldKristina. 2014. “Gender Differences in Experimental Wage Negotiations.” Economic Inquiry52:862–73.
21.
DuchMatthias LudwigGrossmannMax R. P.LauerThomas. 2020. “z-Tree unleashed: A Novel Client-Integrating Architecture for Conducting z-Tree Experiments over the Internet.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance28:100400.
22.
EnglandPaulaLevineAndrewMischelEmma. 2020. “Progress toward Gender Equality in the United States has Slowed or Stalled.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(13):6990–97.
23.
ExleyChristine L.NiederleMurielVesterlundLisa. 2020. “Knowing When to Ask: The Cost of Leaning In.” Journal of Political Economy128:816–54.
24.
FortinNicole M.2005. “Gender Role Attitudes and the Labour-Market Outcomes of Women across OECD Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy21:416–38.
25.
García-CuetoEduardoRodrequez-DiazFrancisco JavierBringas-MolledaCarolinaLopez-CeperoJavierPaino-QuesadaSusanaRodrequez-FrancoLuis. 2015. “Development of the Gender Role Attitudes Scale (GRAS) amongst Young Spanish People.” International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology15:61–68.
26.
GelfandMichele J.SeveranceLauraFulmerC. AshleyAl-DabbaghMay. 2012. “Explaining and Predicting Cultural Differences in Negotiation.” Pp. 332–58 in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Conflict Resolution, edited by CrosonR.BoltonG. E.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
JostJohn T.KayAaron C.2005. “Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88:498–509.
28.
JudgeTimothy A.LivingstonBeth A.2008. “Is the Gap More Than Gender? A Longitudinal Analysis of Gender, Gender Role Orientation, and Earnings.” Journal of Applied Psychology93:994–1012.
29.
KnightCarly R.BrintonMary C.2017. “One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe.” American Journal of Sociology122:1485–532.
30.
KuglerKatharina G.ReifJulia A. M.KaschnerTamaraBrodbeckFelix C.2018. “Gender Differences in the Initiation of Negotiations: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin144:198–222.
31.
LeibbrandtAndreasListJohn. 2015. “Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment.” Management Science61:2016–24.
32.
MazeiJensBilkeLenaHertelGuidoHueffmeierJoachimFreundPhilipp A.StuhlmacherAlice F.2015. “A Meta-analysis on Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcomes and Their Moderators.” Psychological Bulletin141:85–104.
33.
PalanStefanSchitterChristian. 2018. “Prolific.ac: A Subject Pool for Online Experiments.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance17:22–27.
34.
ProudfootDevonKayAaron C.2023. “Communal Expectations Conflict with Autonomy Motives: The Western Drive for Autonomy Shapes Women’s Negative Responses to Positive Gender Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology124:1–21.
35.
RidgewayCecilia L.2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
SandbergSheryl. 2013. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Knopf.
37.
SauerCarstenValetPeterShamsSafiTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2021. “Categorical Distinctions and Claims-Making: Opportunity, Agency, and Returns from Wage Negotiations.” American Sociological Review86:934–59.
38.
ScarboroughWilliam J.MoederJessica. 2022. “Culture’s Gendered Consequences: The Relationship between Local Cultural Conditions and the Gender Wage Gap.” Social Currents9:526–57.
39.
ScarboroughWilliam J.PepinJoanna R.LambouthsDanny L.IIIKwonRonaldMonasterioRonaldo. 2021. “The Intersection of Racial and Gender Attitudes, 1977 through 2018.” American Sociological Review86:823–55.
40.
ScarboroughWilliam J.SinRayRismanBarbara. 2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016.” Gender & Society33:173–200.
41.
ShuXiaolingMeagherKelsey D.2018. “Beyond the Stalled Gender Revolution: Historical and Cohort Dynamics in Gender Attitudes from 1977 to 2016.” Social Forces96:1243–74.
42.
StickneyLisa T.KonradAlison M.2007. “Gender-Role Attitudes and Earnings: A Multinational Study of Married Women and Men.” Sex Roles57:801–11.
43.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldAvent-HoltDustin. 2019. Relational Inequalities: An Organizational Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
