I suggest that we can read Marx in the light of recent analytic, neo-Hegelian thought. I summarize the Pittsburgh School philosophers’ claims about the myth of the given, the claim that human experience is conceptual all the way out, and that we live in a space of reasons. I show how Hegel has been read in those terms, and then apply that reading of Hegel to Marx’s argument that capital is akin to what Hegel called Geist, or spirit. We can understand capitalism as a space of reasons that is contradictory: while the space of reasons is supposed to make human freedom possible, our space of reasons makes freedom impossible. Reading Marx in this way is helpful, because it avoids the flaws of analytical Marxism, existentialism and structuralism. However, it raises a large problem of its own: Can the theory of the space of reasons be applied to a society that is not free of alienation? I argue that it can, but only in ways that would not satisfy the analytic neo-Hegelians themselves.
AdornoTheodor. 1984. “On the Idea of Natural History.” Telos60: 111–24.
2.
AdornoTheodor. 1994. Minima Moralia. Frankfurt am Main: Surkamp Verlag.
3.
AdornoTheodor. 2017. An Introduction to Dialectics. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
AlthusserLouis, et al.2015. Reading Capital. London: Verso.
5.
ArthurChris. 2004. The New Dialectic and Marx’s Capital. Leiden: Brill.
6.
BartonekAnders. 2018. “Karl Korsch: To Make the Right Marx Visible Through Hegel.” In Hegelian Marxism, edited by BartonekAndersBurmanAnders, 35–60. Stockholm: Elanders.
7.
BellofioreRiccardo. 2014. “Lost in Translation? Once Again on the Marx-Hegel Connection.” In Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic, edited by MoseleyFredSmithTony, 164–188. Leiden: Brill.
8.
BellofioreRiccardoRivaThommaso Redolfi. 2015. “The Neue Marx-Lektüre.” Radical Philosophy189: 24–36.
9.
BirdGraham. 1996. “McDowell’s Kant: Mind and World.” Philosophy71: 219–43.
10.
BlumenfeldJacob. 2018. “After Marx, the Deluge.” Historical Materialism26: 194–202.
11.
BottomoreTom, ed. 1991. A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
BourdieuPierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BrandomRobert. 1998. Making it Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
BrandomRobert. 2001. Articulating Reasons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15.
BrandomRobert. 2010. “Inferentialism and Some of its Challenges.” In Reading Brandom, edited by WeissBernardWandererJeremy, 159–180. New York: Routledge.
16.
CohenG. A.. 1982. “Reply to Elster.” Theory and Society11: 483–495.
17.
BurnsTonyIanFraser, eds. 2000. The Hegel-Marx Connection. New York: St Martin’s Press.
18.
CohenG. A.1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CohenG. A.2000. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
CohenG. A.2001. If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich?Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
ColeG. D. H.1964. Socialist Thought: Marxism and Anarchism, 1850–1890. London: MacMillan & Co.
22.
CollettiLucio. 1973. Marxism and Hegel. London: New Left Review Books.
23.
DavidsonDonald. 1973–1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association47: 5–20.
24.
DeVriesWillem. 2014. Wilfrid Sellars. New York: Routledge.
25.
ElsterJon. 1982. “The Case for Methodological Indiviualism.” Theory and Society11: 453–482.
26.
ElsterJon. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FurnerJames. 2018. Marx on Capitalism. Boston: Brill.
28.
GiddensAnthony. 1982. “Commentary on the Debate.” Theory and Society11: 527–39.
29.
GiladiPaulSachsCarl. 2019. “Editors’ Introduction to ‘Hegel and Sellars’.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies27: 359–62.
30.
HabermasJurgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
31.
HarveyDavid. 2018a. A Companion to Marx’s Capital. London: Verso.
32.
HarveyDavid. 2018b. Limits to Capital. London: Verso.
33.
HegelG. W. F.1969. Science of Logic. New York: Humanity Books.
34.
HegelG. W. F.1975. Hegel’s Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
HegelG. W. F.1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
HonnethAxel2008. Reification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
JaeggiRahel2014. Alienation. New York: Columbia University Press.
38.
JaeggiRahel. 2017. “A Wide Concept of Economy.” In Critical Theory in Critical Times, edited by DeutscherPenelopeLafontCristina, 160–79. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
JaeggiRahel2018. Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
JayMartin. 1984. Marxism and Totality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
KantImmanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
KołakowskiLeszek. 2008. Main Currents of Marxism. New York: Norton.
43.
LanceMark. 2008. “Placing in a Space of Reasons.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, edited by MisakCheryl, 403–29. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
LukácsGeorg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
45.
MaherChauncey. 2012. The Pittsburgh School of Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
46.
MarcuseHerbert. 1960. Reason and Revolution. Boston: Beacon Press.
47.
MarxKarl. 1970. Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.
McDowellJohn. 1996. Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51.
McDowellJohn. 2003. “Hegel and the Myth of the Given.” In Das Interesse des Denkens, edited by WelschWolfgangViewegKlaus, 75–88. München: Wilhelm Fink.
52.
McDowellJohn. 2009. Having the World in View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53.
MidtgardenTorjus. 2013. “Conflicting and Complementary Conceptions of Discursive Practice in Non-Metaphysical Interpretations of Hegel.” Philosophy and Social Criticism39: 559–76.
54.
MoggachDouglas. 2013. “German Idealism and Marx.” In Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought, Volume2, edited by BoyleNicholas, 82–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
MoggachDouglas. 2018. “Perfection, Alienation and Freedom.” In Reassessing Marx’s Social and Political Philosophy, edited by KandiyaliJan, 19–42. New York: Routledge.
56.
New Left Review, ed. 1978. Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: Verso.
57.
PinkardTerry. 1996. Hegel’s Phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
PinkardTerry. 2013a. Hegel’s Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
PinkardTerry. 2013b. “Hegels Naturalismus und die Zweite Natur.” In Nach Marx, edited by JaeggiRahelLoickDaniel, 195–227. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
60.
PippinRobert. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
PippinRobert. 1997. Idealism as Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
PippinRobert. 2005. “Brandom’s Hegel.” European Journal of Philosophy13: 381–408.
63.
PippinRobert. 2007. “McDowell’s Germans.” European Journal of Philosophy15: 411–34.
64.
PippinRobert. 2019. Hegel’s Realm of Shadows. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
PopperKarl. 2011. The Open Society. Abingdon: Routledge.
66.
PostoneMoishe. 2003. Time, Labor, and Social Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
PostoneMoishe. 2009. “The Subject and Social Theory: Marx and Lukács on Hegel.” In Karl Marx and Contemporary Philosophy, edited by ChittyA., et al., 205–20. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
68.
QuanteMichael. 2010a. “After Hegel.” In The Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century Philosophy, edited by MoyarDean, 197–237. London: Routledge.
69.
QuanteMichael. 2010b. “‘The Pure Notion of Recognition’: Reflections on the Grammar of the Relation of Recognition in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” In The Philosophy of Recognition, edited by BuschHans-Christoph Schmidt amZurnChristopher F., 89–106. Lanham: Lexington Books.
70.
QuanteMichael. 2011. “Recognition as Social Grammar of Species Being in Marx.” In Recognition and Social Ontology, edited by LaitinenArtoIkaheimoHeikki, 239–67. Leiden: Brill.
71.
QuanteMichael. 2013. “Recognition in Capital.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice16: 713–27.
72.
ReddingPaul. 2007. Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
ReddingPaul. 2010. “The Possibility of German Idealism After Analytic Philosophy: McDowell, Brandom and Beyond.” In Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides, edited by WilliamsJames, 191–202. London: Continuum.
74.
ReddingPaul. 2011. “The Analytic Neo-Hegelianism of John McDowell and Robert Brandom.” In A Companion to Hegel, edited by HoulgateStephenBaurMichael, 576–93. Oxford: Blackwell.
SlobodianQuinn. 2018. Globalists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
87.
SmithTony. 2014. “Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism.” In Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic, edited by MoseleyFredSmithTony, 17–40. Leiden: Brill.
88.
Stedman JonesGareth. 2016. Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
89.
StrollAvrum. 2000. Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
90.
SunkaraBhaskar. 2019. The Socialist Manifesto. New York: Basic Books.
91.
TaylorCharles. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92.
TestaItalo. 2007. “Criticism From Within Nature.” Philosophy and Social Criticism33: 473–97.
93.
UchidaHiroshi. 2015. Marx’s Grundrisse and Hegel’s Logic. New York: Routledge.
94.
VogelmannFrieder. 2019. “Keep Score, and Punish: Brandom’s Concept of Responsibility.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, first published on July 31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719866243.
