Koreans have worked hard to improve the quality of their democracy. They have promoted the rule of law, accountability, control of corruption, freedom, and responsiveness, and made an effort to make government more effective. They are also committed to economic freedom. In relation to the rule of law, significant attention has been devoted to reducing terrorism and violence, making government more effective, and enhancing regulatory quality. However, with regard to accountability, control of corruption, and transparency, Korea has still a long way to go. The analysis of democratization and improvements in the quality of democracy to date suggest that Korea has adapted to the changing economic environment and is sustaining its economic growth. This has been accompanied by social and economic polarization and a consequent demand for more and better welfare services.
ChoiT (2005) Sahoetonghaphyung egyehwachujineul wihan Jungchijedo Jogeun (Political Institutional Conditions for Promoting an Inclusive Globalization). Shinjinbo Report (New Progressive Report) (January): 82–83.
2.
DiamondL (2001) What Civil Society Can Do to Reform, Deepen, and Improve Democracy. Paper presented to the Workshop on Civil Society, Social Capital, and Civic Engagement in Japan and the United States, sponsored by the Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership, The Asia Foundation, and the Program on U.S.–Japan Relations at Harvard University, 12–13 June 2001. Tokyo, Japan.
3.
GinsbergBSchefterM (1999) Politics by Other Means. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Hankyoreh 21 (2010) Gyecheungganeui Sadariga Munujutda (The ladder that provided the upward class mobility was broken). Hankyoreh 21, No. 825 (27August).
5.
HuntingtonSP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
6.
ImHB (2000) Segyehwasidaeui Minjujuui (Democracy in the Era of Globalization: Realities, Theories, and Reflection). Seoul, Korea: Nanam.
7.
ImHB (2004) Faltering democratic consolidation in South Korea: Democracy at the end of the ‘Three Kims’ era. Democratization11(5): 179–198.
8.
ImHB (2007) Yangeukhwasidaeeui Hankookeui Minjujueui (Korean Democracy in the Era of Polarization). Korean Political Science Association and Korean Sociological Association (eds) Hankooksahoeeui Saeroun Galdeunggwa Kookmintonghap (New Conflicts in Korean Society and National Integration). Seoul: Ingansarang.
9.
ImHB (2008) Sunjin Hankookchungchieui Bijungwa Junryak (Visions and Strategies for Advanced Politics in Korea). Paper presented at the Conference Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the Republic of Korea. Korean Political Science Association and Korean Association of Public Administration, 14 September, Seoul.
10.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
LeeJY (2006) Hankookeui Sahoetonghapgwa Joongsancheung Yukseongeui Gwaje (Social Integration in Korea and the Problems of Nurturing the Middle Class). In: Korean Sociological Association (ed.) Joongsancheunggwa Hankookeui Sahoetonghap (Middle Class and Social Integration in Korea). Seoul: Korean Sociological Association.
12.
MorlinoL (2009) Qualities of Democracy: How to Analyze Them?Firenze, Italy: Instituto Italiano di Scienze Umane.
13.
MorlinoL (2011) Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
NoSG (2009) Byungjugo Yakjuneun Lee Myung Bak jungbu (Lee Myung Bak Government gives the disease and offers the remedy). Saesesang Youngu (New Society Research) (October): 6.
15.
O’DonnellG (1999) Delegative democracy. In: O’DonnellG (ed.) Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
16.
RawlsJ (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap University Press.
17.
SchedlerA (1999) Conceptualizing Accountability. In: SchedlerADiamondLPlattnerMF (eds) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. London, UK: Lynne Rienner.
18.
SenAK (2001) Democracy as a universal value. In: DiamondLPlattnerM (eds) The Global Divergence of Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
ShinDC (2002) The cultural foundation of Korean democracy: A comparative perspective on popular support for democracy. In: KimYRLeeHMahIS (eds) Redefining Korean Politics: Lost Paradigm and New Vision. Seoul: Korean Political Science Association.
20.
ShinDCChuY (2004) The Quality of Democracy in South Korea and Taiwan: Subjective Assessment from the Perspectives of Ordinary Citizens. Asian Barometer Working Paper No. 25. Taipei, Taiwan: Asian Barometer Project Office, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica.
21.
ShinKY (2004) Hankookeui Gyegeupgwa Bulpyungdeung (Class and Inequality in Korea). Seoul: Eulyumunhwasa.
22.
ZakariaF (1997) The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs76(6): 22–43.
23.
ZhangX (2010) Global forces and corporate reform in South Korea. International Political Science Review31(1): 59–75.
