A major justification for bringing government “closer to the people” is that it improves the opportunities for and frequency of citizen participation in the political system. This article first reviews the major arguments for decentralisation and why it is credited with increasing participation. I then perform statistical analyses in 22 states with country-level decentralisation data and public opinion data drawn from the 2006 European Social Survey. The findings generally fail to support the conventional wisdom that decentralisation improves political participation.
AlmondGabrielVerbaSidney (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
2.
AnderssonKristervan LaerhovenFrank (2007) From local strongman to facilitator: Institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies40: 1085–1111.
3.
AndrewsW. Christinade VriesMichiel S. (2007) High expectations, varying outcomes: Decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences73(3): 424–451.
4.
BlaisAndré (2000) To Vote or Not To Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5.
BonneyNorman (2003) The Scottish parliament and participatory democracy: Vision and reality. The Political Quarterly74(4): 459–467.
6.
BradyHenryVerbaSidneySchlozmanKay L. (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review89(2): 271–294.
7.
BrancatiDawn (2006) Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization60: 651–685.
8.
CampbellAngusConversePhillipMillerWilliam. (1960) The American Voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
CampbellTim (2003) The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
10.
CrawfordGordon (2009) Making democracy a reality? The politics of decentralisation and the limits to local democracy in Ghana. Journal of Contemporary African Studies27(1): 57–83.
11.
CrookRichard (2003) Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: The politics of local–central relations. Public Administrative Development23: 77–88.
12.
CrookRichardManorJames (1998) Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DahlRobert (1967) The city in the future of democracy. American Political Science Review61(4): 953–970.
14.
DahlRobertTufteEdward (1973) Size and Democracy: The Politics of Smaller European Democracies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
De VriesMichiel S (2000) The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries.European Journal of Political Research38(2): 193–224.
16.
DriskellRobynEmbryElizabethLyonLarry (2008) Faith and politics: The influence of religious beliefs on political participation. Social Science Quarterly89(2): 294–314.
17.
DuncanChristopher (2007) Mixed outcomes: The impact of regional autonomy and decentralization on indigenous ethnic minorities in Indonesia. Development and Change38(4): 711–733.
18.
Escobar-LemmonMaria (2006) Executives, legislatures, and decentralization. The Policy Studies Journal34(2): 245–263.
19.
FanC. SimonLinChenTreismanDaniel (2009) Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics93: 14–34.
20.
FieldhouseEdwardTranmerMarkRussellAndrew (2007) Something about young people or something about elections? Electoral participation of young people in Europe: Evidence from a multilevel analysis of the European Social Survey. European Journal of Political Research46(6): 797–822.
21.
GelineauFrancoisRemmerKaren L. (2006) Political decentralization and electoral accountability: The Argentine experience, 1983–2001.British Journal of Political Science36(1): 133–157.
22.
GimpelJamesSchuknechtbJason (2003) Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box. Political Geography22(5): 471–488.
23.
HartDavid (1972) Theories of government related to decentralization and citizen participation. Public Administration Review32: 603–621.
24.
HoogheLiesbetMarkGarySchakelArjan (2008) Operationalizing regional authority: A coding scheme for 42 countries, 1950–2006. Regional and Federal Studies18(2/3): 123–142.
25.
HowardMark Morjé (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
InmanRobertRubinfeldDaniel (1997) Making sense of the antitrust state action doctrine: Resolving the tension between political participation and economic efficiency. Texas Law Review75: 1203–1299.
27.
JackmanRobertMillerRoss (1995) Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies27(4): 467–492.
28.
KaiserHenry (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 141–151.
29.
KamCindyPalmerCarl (2008) Reconsidering the effects of education on political participation. The Journal of Politics70(3): 612–631.
30.
LandyMarc (1993) Public policy and citizenship. In: IngramH.SmithS. Rathgeb (eds) Public Policy and Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings.
31.
LetkiNatalia (2004) Socialization for participation? Trust, membership, and democratization in East Central Europe. Political Research Quarterly57(4): 665–679.
32.
ManorJames (1999) The political economy of democratic decentralization. Washington, DC.: The World Bank.
33.
MeguidBonnie (2009) Institutional change as strategy: The role of decentralization in party competition. American Political Science Association National Conference, Toronto, Canada.
34.
O’DwyerConor (2006) Reforming regional governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or domestic politics as usual?East European Politics and Societies20(2): 219–253.
35.
OliverJ. Eric (2000) City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America. American Political Science Review94(2): 361–373.
36.
O’NeillKathleen (2003) Decentralization as an electoral strategy. Comparative Political Studies36(9): 1068–1091.
37.
OxhornPhillipTulchinJosephSeleeAndrew (2004) Decentralization, Democratic Governance, and Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Africa, Asia and Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
38.
PatemanCarol (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PorterDavidOlsenEugene (1976) Some critical issues in government centralization and decentralization. Public Administration Review36(1): 72–84.
40.
Prud’hommeRémy (1995) The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer10(2): 201–220.
41.
PrzeworskiAdam (1991) Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PutnamRobert (1995) Tuning in, turning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics28(4): 664–683.
43.
QuintelierEllenVissersSara (2008) The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review26: 411–427.
44.
RadcliffBenjamin (1992) The welfare state, turnout, and the economy. American Political Science Review86(2): 444–456.
45.
RallingsCollinThrasherMichaelGunterChristine (1998) Patterns of voting choice in multimember districts: The case of English local elections. Electoral Studies17: 111–128.
46.
RegulskaJoanna (2009) Governance or self-governance in Poland: Benefits and threats 20 years later. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society22(4): 537–556.
47.
Reyes-GarcíaVictoriaVadezVincentAragónJorge. (2010) The uneven reach of decentralization: A case study among indigenous peoples in the Bolivian Amazon. International Political Science Review31: 229–243.
48.
RobertsNancy (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration34(4): 315–353.
49.
RosenstoneStevenHansenJohn (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
50.
SeligsonAmber (1999) Civic association and democratic participation in Central America: A test of the Putnam thesis. Comparative Political Studies32(3): 342–362.
51.
ShleiferAndreiVishnyRobert (1993) Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics108(3): 599–617.
52.
SorensJason (2009) The partisan logic of decentralization in Europe. Regional & Federal Studies19(2): 255–272.
53.
TreismanDaniel (2007) The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
TolbertCaroline J.McnealRamona S. (2003) Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation?Political Research Quarterly56: 175–185.
55.
VerbaSidneyBurnsNancySchlozmanKay Lehman (1997) Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics59(4): 1051–1072.
56.
YlvisakerArthur Paul (1959) Some criteria for a “proper” areal division of governmental powers. In: MaasA. (ed.) Area and Power: A Theory of Local Government. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
