This article explores the indirect impact of gender quota legislation on the election of women to the South Korean national parliament. Although quotas mainly apply to the proportional representation portion of the mixed electoral system, pressures on parties to comply with quotas for single-member districts has brought about a ‘spillover effect’, whereby women elected via proportional representation quotas are later nominated and re-elected to single-member district seats for which parties do not apply quotas. This effect stems from a ‘no re-election’ norm in the proportional representation system that emerged after electoral reform in the 2000s, combined with the fact that being elected through quotas enhances women’s political experience and thus their chances to run for district seats. While the ‘no re-election’ norm initially exerts a negative impact by preventing women from winning the same seat at the next election, it has a positive prolonged impact on women’s sustainable representation by relocating women incumbents to district seats while also continuing to elect women via quotas.
BhavnaniRikhil (2009) Do electoral quotas work after they are withdrawn? Evidence from a natural experiment in India. American Political Science Review103(1): 23–35.
2.
BjarnegårdElin (2013) Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
CoxKaren E.SchoppaLeonard J. (2002) Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems: Theory and evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies31(3): 267–291.
4.
DahlerupDrudeFreidenvallLenita (2005) Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women. International Feminist Journal of Politics7(1): 26–48.
DahlerupDrudeFreidenvallLenita (2011) Electoral gender quota systems and their implementation in Europe. Study for the European Parliament, September.
7.
DahourHananeDahlerupDrude (2013) Sustainable representation of women through gender quotas: A decade’s experience in Morocco. Women’s Studies International Forum. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.008
8.
FerraraFedericoHerronErik S.NishikawaMisa (2005) Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and Its Consequences. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer F. (eds) (2012) The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
HoodfarHomaTajaliMona (2011) Electoral Politics: Making Quotas Work for Women. London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.
11.
HwangA. Ran (2006) Party competition and its impact on local elections in Korea. Hanguk kwa Kukjejungchi22(2): 1–28 (in Korean).
12.
IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union) (2013) Women in Parliament in 2012: The Year in Perspective. ISSN 1993–5196 (accessed 15 June 2013).
13.
KennyMeryl (2013) Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
KimEun Hee (2012) Women’s election to the National Assembly and women legislators’ roles. Saram kwa JeongchaekSpring: 84–98 (in Korean).
15.
KimEun HeeKimMin JeongOhYu Seok (2013) Women in the Shadow of Gender Politics. Seoul: Sinmyeonggihoek (in Korean).
16.
KimEun Kyeong (2010) The effect of gender quota as a mechanism for women’s representation: Focusing on the initiative bills by women legislators in the 16th and 17th National Assembly. Uijeong Yongu16(2): 101–134 (in Korean).
17.
KimHyun HeeOhYu Seok (2010) The gender quota system in Korean politics – ten years’ experiences. Donhyang Kwa Jeonmang79(Summer): 140–182 (in Korean).
18.
KittilsonMiki CaulSchwindt-BayerLeslie A. (2012) The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
KrookMona Lena (2009) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
KrookMona LenaMackayFiona (eds) (2011) Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
MatlandRichard E. (2005) Enhancing women’s political participation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In: BallingtonJulieKaramAzza (eds) International IDEA Handbook: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers A Revised Edition. Stockholm: International IDEA.
22.
MatlandRichard E.StudlarDonley T. (1996) The contagion of women candidates in single-member districts and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. Journal of Politics58(3): 707–733.
23.
MoserRobert G.ScheinerEthan (2012) Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
NorrisPippa (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ParkChan Wook (2000) Proportional Representation. Seoul: Bakyongsa (in Korean).
26.
PekkanenRobertNybladeBenjaminKlaussEllis (2006) Electoral incentives in mixed-member electoral systems: Party, posts, and zombie politicians in Japan. American Political Science Review100(2): 183–193.
27.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A. (2009) Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies QuarterlyXXXIV(1): 5–28.
28.
Seoul Daily (2000) Editorial: Broken promise on 30 percent quota for women. 1April.
29.
ShinKi-young (2014) Electoral gender quotas and women’s legislative representation in South Korea. In: EtoMikikoMiuraMariShinKi-young. (eds.) Gender Quota: How Have Women Legislators Increased Worldwide?Tokyo: Akashi Shoten (forthcoming, in Japanese).
30.
ShugartMatthew S.WattenbergMartin P. (2001) Mixed-member electoral systems: A definition and typology. In: ShugartMatthew S.WattenbergMartin P. (eds) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
YooSung Jin (2012) 19th congressional election and gender representation: Nomination processes and enhancing gender representation. Dong A Yongu24(3) 207–229 (in Korean).
