This article seeks to expand researchers’ understanding of choice in the reproductive decision-making narratives of heterosexual couples to help explain fertility rates in Spain. The data comprise 32 interviews and two focus groups with heterosexual mothers and fathers. Two broad categories have been identified: couples who chose “when” to have children and couples who chose “whether” to have children. The results show that couples choosing “when” considered having children to be a normal step in the life course and had a shared plan to become parents. Couples who chose “whether” considered having children to be a voluntary lifestyle choice and decisions were more individualized. Both groups reported having decided to have children. Parents’ sense of responsibility for this decision could help explain the postponement of motherhood and low fertility rates in Spain.
AlmelingR. (2015). Reproduction. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 423-442.
2.
AlvarezB. (2013). La maternidad: entre la decisión individual y/o la obligatoriedad social [Motherhood between the individual decision and the social obligation]. In LópezC.MarreD.BestardJ. (Eds.), Maternidades, procreación y crianza en transformación [Motherhod, procreation and childrearing in transformation] (pp. 219-244). Barcelona, Spain: Bellaterra.
3.
BalboN.BillariF. C.MillsM. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29, 1-38.
4.
BartholomaeusC.RiggsD. W. (2017). Intending fathers: Heterosexual men planning for a first child. Journal of Family Studies, 0, 1-15.
5.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. (Original work published 1990)
6.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Beck-GernsheimE. (2011). The post-career mom: Reproductive technology and the promise of reproduction choice. In BeetsG.SchippersJ.te VeldeE. R. (Eds.), The future of motherhood in Western societies. Late fertility and its consecuences (pp. 149-157). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BernardH. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Plymouth, England: AltaMira Press.
9.
BernardiF. (2005). Public policies and low fertility: Rationales for public intervention and a diagnosis for the Spanish case. Journal of European Social Policy, 15, 123-138.
10.
BernardiL.MynarskaM.RossierC. (2015). Uncertain, changing and situated fertility intentions: A qualitative analysis. In PhilipovD.LiefbroerA. C.KlobasJ. (Eds.), Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (pp. 113-139). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
BriggsL.FonsecaC.CardarelloA.MarreD.CollardC.YngvessonB. (2012). Feminism and transnational adoption: Poverty, precarity, and the politics of raising (other people’s?) children. Feminist Theory, 13, 81-100.
12.
Comas d’ArgemirD.MarreD.San RománB. (2016). La regulación política de la familia. Ideología, desigualdad y género en el Plan Integral de Apoyo a la Familia. [Family Politics and Regulation. Ideology, Inequality and Gender in the Family Plan Support]. Política Y Sociedad, 53, 853-877.
13.
CzariawskaB. (2004). Introducing qualitative methods series: Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DelgadoM.RoseA.BarriosL.LopezF. (2009). The delay of maternity and its causes: An analysis of the timing of the first child in Spain. Genus, 65(2), 79-111.
15.
De SouzaR. N. A. (2014). “This child is a planned baby”: Skilled migrant fathers and reproductive decision-making. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 2663-2672.
16.
DonathO. (2015, November-December). Choosing motherhood? Agency and regret within reproduction and mothering retrospective accounts. Women’s Studies International Forum, 53, 200-209.
17.
DoyleJ.PooleyJ. A.BreenL. (2013). A phenomenological exploration of the childfree choice in a sample of Australian women. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 397-407.
EsterbergK. (2008). Planned parenthood: The construction of motherhood in lesbian mother advice books. In O’ReillyA. (Ed.), Feminist mothering (pp. 75-87). New York: State University New York Press.
20.
EsteveA.DevolderD.DomingoA. (2016). La infecunditat a Espanya: tic tac, tic tac, tic tac!!! [Infertility in Spain: tic tac, tic tac, tic tac!!!]. Perspectives Demogràfiques, 1(GenerEs), 1-4.
21.
FairclothC. (2015). Negotiating intimacy, equality and sexuality in the transition to parenthood. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 3. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/20/4/3.html
22.
FranklinS. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells and the future of kinship (pp. 1-30). London, England: Duke University Press.
23.
GantiT. (2014). Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 89-104.
24.
GazsoA.McDanielS. A. (2015). Families by choice and the management of low income through social supports. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 371-395.
25.
GeertzC. (1989). Descripción densa: hacía una teoría interpretativa de la cultura [Thick description: Towards an inerpretative theory of culure]. In En La interpretación de las culturas [The interpretation of cultures] (pp. 19-41). Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa. (Original work published 1973)
26.
GiddensA. (1992). Transformation of intimacy: Love, sexuality and eroticism in modern societies. Oxford, England: Polity Press.
27.
GillespieR. (2003). Childfree and feminine: Understanding the gender identity of voluntarily childless women. Gender and Society, 17, 122-136.
28.
GinsburgF.RappR. (1991). The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 311-343.
29.
GinsburgF.RappR. (1995). Introduction. In GinsburgF.RappR. (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 1-17). Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
GrayE. (2009). Doing research in real world. London, England: Sage.
31.
HakimC. (2003). Models of the family in modern societies. Ideals and realities. Hants, England: Ashgate.
32.
HanB. C. (2014a). La agonía del Eros [Eros agony]. Barcelona, Spain: Herder.
33.
HanB. C. (2014b). Psicopolítica [Psicopolitics]. Barcelona, Spain: Herder.
34.
HarknettK.BillariF. C.MedaliaC. (2014). Do family support environments influence fertility? Evidence from 20 European countries. European Journal of Population, 30, 1-33.
35.
HarveyD. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
36.
HarveyD. (2005). Neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
HaysSh. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
HertzR. (2006). Single by chance, mothers by choice: How woman are choosing parenthood without marriage and creating the New American Family. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
HowellS. (2007). The kinning of foreigners: Transnational adoption in a global perspective. Oxford, England: Berghnan Books.
40.
IllouzE. (2012). Por qué duele el amor Una explicación sociológica [Why love hurts? A sociological explication]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Katz.
41.
ImazE. (2010). Convertirse en madre: etnografía del tiempo de gestación [Becoming a mother: An ethnography of pregnancy]. Madrid, Spain: Cátedra.
42.
InhornM.CameliD. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 177-196.
43.
InhornM.Van BalenF. (Eds). (2002). Infertility around the globe. New thinking on childlessness, gender and reproductive technolgies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
Instituto de Política Familiar. (2016). Informe de la Evolución de la Familia en España [Spanish family evolution report]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
45.
Instituto National de Estadística. (2016). Indicador Coyuntural de Fecundidad por Provincia, según orden de nacimiento (Total Fertility Rate by Region, according to the birth date). Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=1478
46.
KlobasJ. E.AjzenI. (2015). Making the decision to have a child. In PhilipovD.LiefbroerA. C.KlobasJ. (Eds.), Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (pp. 41-78). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
KohlerH. P.BillariF.OrtegaJ. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28, 641-680.
48.
Koropeckyj-coxT.PendellG. (2007). Attitutes about childlessness in the United States. Correlates of possitive, neutral and negative responses. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1054-1082.
49.
KrauseE. (2012). “They just happened”: The curious case of the unplanned baby, Italian low fertility, and the “end” of rationality. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 26, 361-382.
50.
LashS. (2002). Foreword by Scott Lash: Individualization in a non-linear mode. In BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (Eds.), Individualization. Institutinalized individualism and its social and political consequences (pp. vi-xiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
LuxtonM. (2010). Doing neoliberalism. Perverse individualism in personal life. In BraedleyS.LuxtonM. (Eds.), Neoliberalism and everyday life (pp. 163-183). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
52.
MacinnesJ. (2006). Voluntary childlessness, fertility “plans” and the “demand” for children: Evidence from Eurobarometer surveys (Vol. 287). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centre d’Estudis Demogràfics.
53.
MarkensS. (2007). Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
MarneffeD. (2004). Maternal desire. On children, love, and the inner life. New York, NY: Back Bay Books.
55.
MarreD. (2009). Los silencios de la adopción en España [The silence of adoption in Spain]. Revista de Antropología Social, 19, 97-126.
56.
MarreD. (2011). Cambios en la cultura de la adopción y de la filiación [Changes in the adoption and filiation culture]. In ChacónF.BestardJ. (Eds.), Familias. Historia de la sociedad española (siglos XIII-XXI) [Families. History of the Spanish society: XIII-XXI centuries] (pp. 893-952). Madrid, Spain: Cátedra.
57.
MarreD.BestardJ. (2004). La Adopción y el acogimiento: presente y perspectivas [Adoption and foster care: Present and perspectives]. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat de Barcelona.
58.
MarreD.San RománB.GuerraD. (2018). On reproductive work in Spain. Transnational adoption, egg donation, surrogacy. Medical Anthropology, 36, 158-173.
59.
McBrideK. D. (2008). No, I’m not catholic, and yes, they’re all mine. The narratives of feminist mothering on the tenure track. In O’ReillyA. (Ed.), Feminist mothering (pp. 45-60). New York: State University New York Press.
60.
McKinnonS. (2015). Productive paradoxes of the assisted reproductive technologies in the context of the new kinship studies. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 461-479.
61.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
MeyersD. T. (2001). The rush to motherhood: Pronatalist discourse and women’s autonomy. Signs, 26, 735-773.
63.
MillerW. B.SeveryL. J.PastaD. J. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, 58, 193-205.
64.
MorisonT. (2013). Heterosexual men and parenthood decision making in South Africa attending to the invisible norm. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 1125-1144.
65.
MorisonT.MacleodC. (2015). Men’s pathways to parenthood: Silences and heterosexual gender norms. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
66.
MorrisC. (2015). Considerations of equality in heterosexual single mothers’ intimacy narratives. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 1-11. doi:10.5153/sro.3817
67.
OverallC. (2012). Introduction. In OverallC. (Ed.), Why have children? The ethical debate (pp. 1-17). Cambridge: MIT Press.
68.
PaxsonH. (2004). Making modern mothers. Ethics and family planning in urban Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
PhilipovD.LiefbroerA. C.KlobasJ. (2015). Preface. In PhilipovD.LiefbroerA. C.KlobasJ. (Eds.), Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (pp. v-vi). New York, NY: Springer.
70.
PlummerK. (2003). Intimate citizenship: Private decisions and public dialogues. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
RibbensJ.EdwardsR. (2011). Key concepts in family studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
RiessmanC. (2008). Narratives methods for human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
RiggsD.BartholomaeusC. (2016a). The desire for a child amongst a sample of heterosexual Australian couples. Journal of Infant and Reproductive Psychology, 34, 442-450.
75.
RiggsD. W.BartholomaeusC. (2016b). “It’s just what you do”: Australian middle-class heterosexual couples negotiating compulsory parenthood. Feminism & Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0959353516675637
76.
RijkenA.KnijnT. (2009). Couple’s decisions to have the first child: Comparing pathways to early and late parenthood. Demographic Research, 21, 765-802.
77.
SchneiderD. (1980). American kinship: A cultural account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1968)
78.
SevónE. (2005). Timing motherhood: Experiencing and narrating the choice to become a mother. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 461-482.
79.
SmietanaM. (2016). “Families like we’d always known”? Spanish gay fathers’ normalization narratives in transnational surrogacy. In LieM.LykkeN. (Eds.), Assisted reproduction across borders feminist perspectives on normalization, disruptions and transmissions (pp. 49-60). London, England: Routledge.
80.
SmithL. (2012). The demands of motherhood. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
SobotkaT. (2009). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement childbearing?Population and Development Review, 30, 195-220.
82.
SolingerR. (2001). Beggars and choosers. How the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare in the United States. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
83.
StrathernM. (1992a). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
84.
StrathernM. (1992b). Reproducing the future: Essays on anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
85.
TanturriM. L.MencariniL. (2008). Childless or childfree? Paths to voluntary childlessness in Italy. Population and Development Review, 34, 51-77.
86.
TanturriM. L.MillsM.RotkirchA.SobotkaT.TakácsJ.MiettinenA.. . . NasiriD. (2015). State-of-the-art report childlessness in Europe. Families and Societies (Working Paper No. 32). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
87.
TaylorE. N. (2003). Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Childfree advocates and the rhetoric of choice. Women and Politics, 24(4), 39-75.
88.
TemanE. (2010). Birthing a mother. The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press.
89.
TodorovaI. L. G.KotzevaT. (2003). Social discourses, women’s resistive voices: Facing involuntary childlessness in Bulgaria. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 139-151.
Van de KaaD. J. (1996). Anchored narratives: The story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility. Population Studies, 50, 389-432.
92.
VandenbeldM. (2014). Introduction. An alternative mother-centred economic paradigm. In VandenbeldM. (Ed.), Mothering in the age of neoliberalism (pp. 1-30). Bradford, England: Demeter Press.
93.
WestonK. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
