Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are driving innovative new health care solutions. We aim to review the state of the art of AI in otology and provide a discussion of work underway, current limitations, and future directions.

Data Sources

Two comprehensive databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were mined using a directed search strategy to identify all articles that applied AI to otology.

Review Methods

An initial abstract and title screening was completed. Exclusion criteria included nonavailable abstract and full text, language, and nonrelevance. References of included studies and relevant review articles were cross-checked to identify additional studies.

Conclusion

The database search identified 1374 articles. Abstract and title screening resulted in full-text retrieval of 96 articles. A total of N = 38 articles were retained. Applications of AI technologies involved the optimization of hearing aid technology (n = 5; 13% of all articles), speech enhancement technologies (n = 4; 11%), diagnosis and management of vestibular disorders (n = 11; 29%), prediction of sensorineural hearing loss outcomes (n = 9; 24%), interpretation of automatic brainstem responses (n = 5; 13%), and imaging modalities and image-processing techniques (n = 4; 10%). Publication counts of the included articles from each decade demonstrated a marked increase in interest in AI in recent years.

Implications for Practice

This review highlights several applications of AI that otologists and otolaryngologists alike should be aware of given the possibility of implementation in mainstream clinical practice. Although there remain significant ethical and regulatory challenges, AI powered systems offer great potential to shape how healthcare systems of the future operate and clinicians are key stakeholders in this process.

Keywords

machine learning otology artificial intelligence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Esteva

Kuprel

Novoa

, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115-118.

Gulshan

Peng

Coram

, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402-2410.

Komorowski

Celi

Badawi

Gordon

Faisal

. The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nat Med. 2018;24:1716-1720.

LeCun

Bengio

Hinton

. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436-444.

Bur

Shew

New

. Artificial intelligence for the otolaryngologist: a state of the art review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160:603-611.

Crowson

Ranisau

Eskander

, et al. A contemporary review of machine learning in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:45-51.

Artificial intelligence. In: Oxford Dictionary. Oxford University Press; 2019.

McCormack

Fortnum

. Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them? Int J Audiol. 2013;52:360-368.

Kates

. On the feasibility of using neural nets to derive hearing-aid prescriptive procedures. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98:172-180.

10.

Chalupper

Powers

. Changing how gain is selected: the benefits of combining datalogging and a learning VC. Hear J. 2006;13:46-55.

11.

Mueller

Hornsby

BWY

Weber

. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:758-773.

12.

Keidser

Alamudi

. Real-life efficacy and reliability of training a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 2013;34:619-629.

13.

Aldaz

Puria

Leifer

. Smartphone-based system for learning and inferring hearing aid settings. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016;27:732-749.

14.

Boll

. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans Acoust. 1979;27:113-120.

15.

Lim

Oppenheim

. Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech. Proc IEEE. 1979;67:1586-1604.

16.

Ephraim

Malah

. Speech enhancement using a minimum-mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator. IEEE Trans Acoust. 1984;32:1109-1121.

17.

Dai

Lee

. A regression approach to speech enhancement based on deep neural networks. IEEE-ACM T Audio SPE. 2015;23:7-19.

18.

Kumar

Florencio

. Speech enhancement in multiple-noise conditions using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2016;160502427.

19.

Metz

Schiavetti

Knight

. The use of artificial neural networks to estimate speech intelligibility from acoustic variables: a preliminary analysis. J Commun Disord. 1992;25:43-53.

20.

Kates

Arehart

Souza

. Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134:4458.

21.

Mira

Buizza

Magenes

Manfrin

Schmid

. Expert systems as a diagnostic aid in otoneurology. ORL. 1990;52:96-103.

22.

Gavilán

Gallego

Gavilán

. ‘Carnisel’: an expert system for vestibular diagnosis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1990;110:161-167.

23.

Kentala

Auramo

Pyykkö

Juhola

. Otoneurological expert system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:654-658.

24.

Laurikkala

JPS

Kentala

Juhola

Pyykkö

. A novel machine learning program applied to discover otological diagnoses. Scand Audiol. 2001;30:100-102.

25.

Siermala

Juhola

Kentala

. Neural network classification of otoneurological data and its visualization. Comput Biol Med. 2008;38:858-866.

26.

Miettinen

Juhola

. Classification of otoneurological cases according to Bayesian probabilistic models. J Med Syst. 2010;34:119-130.

27.

Varpa

Joutsijoki

Iltanen

Juhola

. Applying one-vs-one and one-vs-all classifiers in k-nearest neighbour method and support vector machines to an otoneurological multi-class problem. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:579-583.

28.

Exarchos

Rigas

Bibas

, et al. Mining balance disorders’ data for the development of diagnostic decision support systems. Comput Biol Med. 2016;77:240-248.

29.

Rammazzo

Kikidis

Anwer

, et al. EMBalance—validation of a decision support system in the early diagnostic evaluation and management plan formulation of balance disorders in primary care: study protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:435-.

30.

Juhola

. On machine learning classification of otoneurological data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:211-216.

31.

Yeh

Huang

Wang

, et al. Machine learning-based assessment tool for imbalance and vestibular dysfunction with virtual reality rehabilitation system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;116:311-318.

32.

Krafczyk

Tietze

Swoboda

Valkovic

Brandt

. Artificial neural network: a new diagnostic posturographic tool for disorders of stance. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1692-1698.

33.

Kimberley

Roth

. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994;73:812-813.

34.

Buller

Lutman

. Automatic classification of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions using an artificial neural network. Br J Audiol. 1998;32:235-247.

35.

de Waal

Hugo

Soer

Krüger

. Predicting hearing loss from otoacoustic emissions using an artificial neural network. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2002;49:28-39.

36.

Subramaniam

Sridhar

Paulraj

. Auditory evoked potentials based detection of hearing threshold using PSO neural network. Pak J Biol Sci. 2016;13.

37.

Ziavra

Kastanioudakis

Trikalinos

Skevas

Ioannidis

JPA

. Diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss with neural networks versus logistic regression modeling of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiol Neurotol. 2004;9:81-87.

38.

Aliabadi

Farhadian

Darvishi

. Prediction of hearing loss among the noise-exposed workers in a steel factory using artificial intelligence approach. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015;88:779-787.

39.

Farhadian

Aliabadi

Darvishi

. Empirical estimation of the grades of hearing impairment among industrial workers based on new artificial neural networks and classical regression methods. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2015;19:84-89.

40.

Bing

Ying

Miao

, et al. Predicting the hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss via machine learning models. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43:868-874.

41.

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. Machine learning models for the hearing impairment prediction in workers exposed to complex industrial noise: a pilot study. Ear Hear. 2019;40:690-699.

42.

Vidler

Parker

. Auditory brainstem response threshold estimation: subjective threshold estimation by experienced clinicians in a computer simulation of the clinical test. Int J Audiol. 2004;43:417-429.

43.

Alpsan

. Classification of auditory brainstem responses by human experts and backipropagation neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol. 13. IEEE: 1991.

44.

Acır

Özdamar

Güzeliş

. Automatic classification of auditory brainstem responses using SVM-based feature selection algorithm for threshold detection. Eng Appl Artif Intel. 2006;19:209-218.

45.

Davey

McCullagh

Lightbody

McAllister

. Auditory brainstem response classification: A hybrid model using time and frequency features. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40:1-14.

46.

Dass

Holi

Soundararajan

. Classification of brainstem auditory evoked potentials using artificial neural network based on time and frequency domain features. J Clin Eng. 2016;41:72-82.

47.

McKearney

MacKinnon

. Objective auditory brainstem response classification using machine learning. Int J Audiol. 2019;58:224-230.

48.

Lewis

Gandomkar

Brennan

. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice: looking to the future. J Med Radiat Sci. 2019;66:292-295.

49.

Liu

Zhu

Kim

Raphael

Applegate

Oghalai

. ELHnet: a convolutional neural network for classifying cochlear endolymphatic hydrops imaged with optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8:4579-4594.

50.

Abdollahi

Mostafaei

Cheraghi

Shiri

Rabi Mahdavi

Kazemnejad

. Cochlea CT radiomics predicts chemoradiotherapy induced sensorineural hearing loss in head and neck cancer patients: a machine learning and multi-variable modelling study. Phys Med. 2018;45:192-197.

51.

Myburgh

van Zijl

Swanepoel

Hellstrom

Laurent

. Otitis media diagnosis for developing countries using tympanic membrane image-analysis. EBioMedicine. 2016;5:156-160.

52.

Lee

Choi

S-H

Chung

. Automated classification of the tympanic membrane using a convolutional neural network. Appl Sci. 2019;9:1827.

53.

Buch

Ahmed

Maruthappu

. Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68:143-144.

54.

Wang

Peng

Bagheri

Summers

. Chestx-ray8: hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE: 2017.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB