This article explores the different models of political communication that inhere in Hardt and Negri’s Empire trilogy, models that are explicit and implicit, intended and accidental, dominant and latent. From their existence tangled up in Hardt and Negri’s work, I draw out for consideration the communicative models of the rhizome-book, manifesto, textbook, mass-market book, autonomous language, and political journal. My aim is less to evaluate the relative dominance of these models in the trilogy, than to take the opportunity this work offers for thinking political communication as specifically communist problematic, a somewhat neglected field of inquiry.
PuchnerM. (2006). Poetry of the revolution: Marx, manifestos, and the avant-gardes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ThoburnN. (2001). Autonomous production? On Negri’s “new synthesis.”Theory, Culture and Society, 18(5), 75-96.
17.
ThoburnN. (2003). Deleuze, Marx and politics. London, UK: Routledge.
18.
ThoburnN. (2006). Vacuoles of noncommunication: Minor politics, communist style, and the multitude. In BuchananI.ParrA. (Eds.), Deleuze and the contemporary world. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
19.
ŽižekS. (2001). Have Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri rewritten the communist manifesto for the twenty-first century?Rethinking Marxism, 13, 190-198.
