Abstract
Guilt is a multifaceted construct that manifests in distinct yet intricate ways across OCD and depression. This systematic review is a comprehensive taxonomy of 20 different types of guilt identified strictly on the clinical population of these two disorders that are documented in the literature. Despite the theoretical and clinical relevance of guilt, specialized, multidimensional measures of guilt are lacking, and a unified conceptual framework is needed to guide future research and inform more effective assessment and intervention strategies targeting guilt-related mechanisms in these disorders.Key Messages:
Persistent, irrational, and maladaptive guilt has been associated with many internalizing disorders and symptoms of mental illnesses. Guilt is elucidated through various perspectives, majorly revolving around the violation of one’s internal set of standards and rules.1-3 Other than obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and depression, psychopathologies such as post-traumatic stress disorder,4-6 generalized anxiety disorder, 7 and eating disorder 8 have been closely linked with the guilt construct and have been the focus of the researchers. Empirical evidence strongly suggests that individuals with psychiatric disorders tend to experience heightened feelings of guilt9-11 and that exaggerated feelings of guilt are qualitatively distinct compared to individuals without such conditions.12,13
Different Types of Guilt
Different theorists divide guilt into different subtypes, and no two subtypes are the same. Guilt can be objective, arising when an individual breaches a rule established by a state, religion, community, or social group. By definition, that person may be labeled as guilty when they have violated such a rule, potentially resulting in reprimand or punishment. 14 Meanwhile, subjective guilt is derived from a negative reflection of self-concerning others, accompanied by the transgression of one’s moral code of conduct. 15 Tilghman-Osborne et al. 16 coded prominent features noticed in individuals experiencing guilt, including moral and social transgression, self-inclusion or exclusion, experience or lack of reference of the presence of an actual or fictionalized audience, behavior or activity (action or inaction), maladaptivity and adaptivity, remorse or apology, reparation, specificity (a transient experience that cannot be generalized), painfulness, and an implausible sense of responsibility. Guilt is a complex and vexatious emotion that can be adaptive or maladaptive. Tangney et al. 17 differentiated between adaptive and maladaptive guilt. Adaptive guilt is an emotional response triggered by a specific behavioral transgression, leading to remorse and promoting positive social functions such as conflict resolution and altruism. However, maladaptive guilt can be counterproductive and contribute to psychopathological conditions.
Guilt in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Depression
In OCD, extreme guilt experiences are commonly reported, and numerous studies have established a positive correlation between OCD and guilt.18,19 Cognitive models propose that the primary objective of OCD symptoms is to avert or counteract the potential experience of guilt.20-22 Individuals with OCD feel the need to police themselves morally, and minor violations of their moral code become unacceptable. Guilt in depression is a symptom included in diagnostic criteria, rating scales, and phenomenological conceptualizations.23-27 Rado 28 viewed depression as a self-inflicted punishment emerging from guilt, while Freud 29 theorized severe guilt as the causal factor of introjected anger in depression. Clinically, guilt is often seen as a symptom associated with the severity of depression, and numerous studies have consistently demonstrated positive associations between quantitative measures of guilt and self-reported depressive symptoms.30-32
Need for the Review
Guilt has been a longstanding focus of scholarly investigation, with early reviews exploring its interpersonal nature 33 and intrapsychic or interpersonal dimensions. 34 While these were guilt-centric reviews, later reviews and meta-analyses have portrayed guilt as a peripheral phenomenon, mostly intertwined with shame.35-37 This holds even when guilt is examined in relation to OCD 38 and depression. 39 Furthermore, the literature exists where depression and guilt were phenomenologically analysed 40 or investigations into one specific subtype of guilt in OCD were focused on. 41 Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, an in-depth contrastive analysis of guilt across clinically diagnosed OCD and depression remains a largely unexplored area of research. An intriguing question that remains to be probed is the extent to which different subtypes of guilt have been studied in the context of OCD and depression within the existing literature. Do they exhibit similar or distinct patterns of guilt manifestation? This literature review highlights the dearth of systematic efforts to integrate the various subtypes of guilt across various measures, with the overarching aim of elucidating the diverse yet potentially overlapping nature of guilt in OCD and depression.
Methods
Sources and Search Strategy
For evidence-based reporting, this review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) by Page et al. 42 (Figure 1). Time specifiers were set from August 1990 until February 2024. For this article, electronic databases, including PubMed-NCBI, Directory of Open Access Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and Sage databases, were used. Searching keywords like “guilt,” “types of guilt,” “nature of guilt,” and “impact of guilt” in combinations with “OCD,” “depression,” or “major depressive disorder (MDD),” relevant Boolean operators such as “AND” and “OR” were applied. All articles finally included in this review were sourced exclusively from peer-reviewed journals. Studies in English relevant to the focus of the review were included, tabulated, and critically reviewed by all the authors.
PRISMA Flow Diagram Showing the Process of Selection of the Studies for the Review.
Eligibility Criteria and Selection Process
This review strictly included studies that (a) explicitly examined at least one (preferably more) distinct dimension(s) of guilt in relation to OCD and/or depression; (b) involved clinical samples with a formal diagnosis of OCD or depression, established through standardized diagnostic criteria; (c) were adult population-based; (d) clearly articulated their aims, methodologies, and outcomes, upholding superior research quality standards; and (e) were published in the English language. We excluded studies that (a) evaluated other guilt-related constructs such as shame, worry, or self-blame, and not specifically focused on assessing guilt; and (b) reviewed articles, abstracts of conference proceedings, and editorials.
Data Collection Process
Three reviewers (including both the authors) independently selected articles on the basis of their titles and abstracts. After identifying them, the reviewers screened them according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full texts of 20 shortlisted articles were manually reviewed to ensure compliance with eligibility criteria.
Results
Data Synthesis
This review synthesized evidence from a wide spectrum of research designs, with a predominance of quantitative studies encompassing cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, randomized controlled trials, observational, and comparative designs. Given the stringent inclusion criteria and the limited number of available studies in this field, we also retained qualitative research, including a phenomenological approach, single case study, and case series.
Nature of Guilt in OCD from Literature
The divergent conceptualizations of guilt and its various operational methods of assessment make it hard to categorize it discreetly. One of the most common ways to categorize guilt is by evaluating the current affective state of guilt (state guilt) versus guilt as a dispositional tendency (trait guilt). Trait guilt refers to an individual’s predisposition or personality trait toward experiencing guilt that extends beyond immediate circumstances, resulting in a persistent sense of guilt proneness. As Donald L. Mosher
43
described it,
In contrast,
Overall guilt was significantly associated with four OCD dimensions: contamination, unacceptable thoughts, responsibility for harming or making mistakes, and symmetry/ordering. Trait guilt specifically predicted the contamination dimension, highlighting the potential for developing guilt-specific strategies in the clinical population. Geissner et al. 49 focused on the multidimensional experience of guilt in individuals with OCD, comparing them with matched healthy controls. Guilt proneness was assessed using the State & Trait Guilt Scale 50 and the Test of Self-Conscious Affect.51-52 Additionally, a guilt-inducing scenario-based test evaluated guilt based on interpersonal responsibility, considerateness, morality/norm violation, and risk aversion. The outcome confirms the presence of more pronounced trait guilt among individuals with OCD as opposed to the matched control group with healthy participants. Participants with OCD are also clearly found to have more guilt because of interpersonal responsibility and considerateness and a stronger sense of guilt due to norm violation and risk aversion or overconsideration of morality.
Two specific kinds of guilt, that is,
A validated fMRI paradigm involving emotional facial expressions and contextual sentences was used on OCD and healthy participants. The results revealed heightened levels of state and trait guilt in OCD participants compared to controls. Interestingly, individuals with OCD exhibited abnormal brain activation patterns, particularly reduced activity in the anterior cingulate and frontal gyrus regions when experiencing guilt. Furthermore, while deontological guilt elicited decreased activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus, altruistic guilt did not show the same pattern, suggesting selective dysfunctional processing in OCD. Mancini and Gangemi 59 compared altruistic guilt in their research to elucidate whether individuals with OCD exhibit a greater tendency to avoid deontological guilt. In two studies of their research, participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios requiring moral decision-making. The findings indicated that individuals with OCD displayed a preference for omission over consequentialist options, particularly in scenarios involving deontological guilt. This inclination toward avoidance of deontological guilt was more pronounced in OCD participants than clinical and nonclinical control groups. While both deontological guilt and altruistic guilt play significant roles, individuals with OCD may exhibit a heightened sensitivity to deontological guilt, leading to avoidance behaviors. To summarize, the findings of this study demonstrated that individuals with OCD are more inclined toward averting feelings of deontological guilt than toward prioritizing altruistic guilt.
The next study explored three different guilt types, that is, interpersonal harm guilt, norm violation guilt, and self-control failure guilt, measured with the Problematic Situations Questionnaire (PSQ).
2
Steketee and White
19
delved into the interplay between guilt, religiosity, and the severity of OCD symptoms. Comparing individuals with OCD to those with other anxiety disorders, they found a positive correlation between religiosity, guilt (particularly interpersonal harm guilt), and OCD severity. This suggests that religiously devout individuals with OCD may experience heightened guilt, especially related to interpersonal harm, compared to those with different anxiety disorders. The next three early categories of guilt found in the literature are
Additionally, OCD symptom severity was positively associated with guilt for infringing on moral norms. The diverse and mixed nature of the non-OCD sample group and the absence of a healthy control group in the present study may have restricted the overall impact of guilt in the genesis of psychopathology in general. However, the clinical implementation of guilt on OCD in this study had been insightful.
Various studies that measured guilt through questionnaires accounted for the self-reported version of persons with OCD or analyzed therapeutic reports of them and revealed positive correlations between OCD and guilt experiences. Savoie 67 took a unique phenomenological approach to understanding guilt in OCD. Through an unstructured, in-depth interview with specific emphasis on the importance of guilt, their encounter with guilt, and OC symptoms as experienced by them, 15 descriptive themes were derived, capturing the personalized nature of guilt experiences in OCD. These themes ranged from forbidden thoughts and feelings to interpersonal isolation and waste. This qualitative research posited that the significance of guilt in OCD is profoundly personalized, with guilt potentially occurring before, driving, ensuing, and resulting from the manifestation of OC symptoms. While the study’s generalizability and predictive value may be questioned, it offered meaningful reflection on the experiences of guilt in individuals with OCD, which can also be very significant for intervention purposes. Table 1 provides an overview of studies on the nature of guilt in OCD, ordered chronologically by publication date.
Summary of Studies on the Nature of Guilt in OCD.
CC, clinical controls; NCC, nonclinical controls; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging.
By delving into the existing literature, it is evident that a comprehensive body of research consisting of 12 studies has been exclusively conducted on individuals with OCD that have centered on unraveling the intricate nature of guilt experienced by them.
Nature of Guilt in Depression from Literature
The literature on guilt in depression presents a scattered categorization, making it challenging to recapitulate under a single framework. The intensity of guilt appears to be influenced by the severity of depression, and dysfunctional guilt emerges as a crucial aspect of the subjective experience of depression. Early studies, like Prosen et al., 68 documented the occurrence of severe feelings of guilt in individuals diagnosed with MDD, although without the use of dedicated scales or specific guilt categories.
Ghatavi et al.
69
conducted a comprehensive study investigating distinct characteristics of guilt in patients with MDD. They compared individuals with current major depressive episodes, past MDD (currently euthymic), chronic cardiac illness, and healthy controls. Using the Guilt Inventory, they measured
The literature on depression has explored several unique forms of guilt that are distinct from the guilt conceptualizations in other disorders like OCD. Three such unique guilt types are
An exclusively reported form of guilt in depression is
Summary of Studies on the Nature of Guilt in Depression.
CC, clinical controls; NCC, nonclinical controls, MDD, major depressive disorder; MDE, major depressive episode; RDD, recurrent depressive disorder.
Through an extensive exploration of the available literature, it is apparent that eight scholarly articles solely focused on elucidating the complex nature of guilt in individuals with depression. Table 3 provides a concise illustration of subtypes of guilt observed in various studies among individuals with OCD and depression.
Comprehensive Depiction of Various Types of Guilt in OCD and Depression.
This review critically amalgamated the abiding literature on the diverse guilt dimensions assessed in OCD and depression, elucidating similarities, distinctions, and potential implications. This review comprehensively cataloged the different guilt constructs explored in the literature for these two disorders. We found a sum of 20 types of guilt and 15 themes (for OCD) in the literature that have been assessed in both OCD and depression. Moreover, 5 types of guilt and 15 themes of guilt were exclusively studied for the OCD population, and 6 types of guilt were only evaluated among persons with depression.
Limitations
The review only included studies published in English, potentially needing to include relevant research published in other languages. This review adhered to rigorous criteria for identifying, screening, and including studies from high-quality peer-reviewed journals to ensure the incorporation of robust research. However, a formal quality assessment tool may be necessary to ensure the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the included studies. Formal statistical tests could not be conducted, and gray literature could not be included to address publication bias. This implies that the possibility of the findings being influenced by publication bias cannot be ruled out, which may affect the overall conclusions of the review.
Conclusion
This review was an attempt to synthesize the empirical research in the varied areas of guilt in two mental illnesses where guilt is emphasized as a pathognomonic factor. Despite its importance, our findings reveal a paucity of specialized, guilt-centric measurement tools tailored for clinical populations. In literature, guilt has predominantly been portrayed as a peripheral construct, but it is essential to devote attention to guilt as an individual unit. The synthesis of extant literature highlights several key gaps. First is the need for robust, multidimensional measures of guilt that capture disorder-specific manifestations and elucidate shared guilt processes across these conditions. Second, dedicated research efforts must be directed toward an in-depth delineation of how guilt functions distinctly or similarly attributes in the emergence, persistence, or outcome of OCD and depression. Third, a unified conceptual framework concerning guilt is still lacking.
By systematically mapping the diverse guilt constructs studied in relation to these disorders, this review provides an empirical foundation for such future initiatives. Crucially, it calls for transcending siloed approaches to examining guilt through an integrative cross-disorder lens. Only through such concerted research focus we can achieve a comprehensive understanding of guilt as a pathogenic force, ultimately guiding more effective assessment and psychological intervention refinement targeting guilt-related mechanisms in OCD and depression.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all the esteemed researchers and scholars whose invaluable contributions have significantly advanced the understanding of this specialized area of research.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration Regarding the Use of Generative AI
None used.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
