Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-2
The effects of music composition as a classroom activity on engagement in music education and academic and music achievement: A quasi-experimental study
The present study aims to contribute to the understanding of the effects of music education, in particular music composition as a classroom activity for fifth- and sixth-graders. The intervention (experimental condition) focused on a three-step-model for music composition, based on the Cultural Historical Activity Theory of education, and has been compared with a teacher-centered approach mainly based on students’ reproduction of music (control condition). Results indicated that after the six-month intervention period, students in the experimental group were more engaged in music education compared to students in the control group. The research did not show a statistical difference in learning outcomes with regard to intelligence, academic achievement and music achievement, although the students of the experimental group performed better with regard to reading comprehension than their counterparts in the control group. The authors conclude that music composition as a classroom activity is feasible and useful in elementary schools.
AbikoffH.CourtneyM. E.SzeibelP. J.KoplewiczH. S. (1996). The effects of auditory stimulation on the arithmetic performance of children with ADHD and nondisabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 238–246.
2.
BastianH. G. (2002). Musik(erziehung) und ihre Wirkung. Eine Langzeitstudie an Berliner Grundschulen [Music education and its effects. A long-term study in elementary schools in Berlin]. Mainz: Schott.
3.
BilhartzT. D.BruhnR. A.OlsonJ. E. (2000). The effect of early music training on child cognitive development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 615–636.
4.
BodovskiK.FarkasG. (2007). Mathematics grow in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and Instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 2(108), 115–130.
5.
BolducJ. (2009). Effects of a music programme on kindergartners’ phonological awareness skills. International Journal of Music Education, 27(1), 37–47.
6.
CampbellP. S.Scott-KassnerC. (2006). Music in childhood: From preschool though the elementary grades. Boston, MA: Schirmer.
7.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
8.
ColeM.EngeströmY. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Costa-GiomiE. (1999). The effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s cognitive development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(3), 198–212.
10.
de WijsA.KromR. (2008). Spelling groep 6. Handleiding [Spelling group 6. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
11.
de WijsA.KromR.BerkelS. van (2007). Spelling groep 5. Handleiding [Spelling group 5. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
12.
Eastlund GromkoJ. (2005). The effect of music instruction on phonemic awareness in beginning readers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(3), 199–209.
13.
Eastlund GromkoJ.Smith PoormanA. (1998). The effect of music training on preschoolers’ spatial-temporal task performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(2), 173–181.
14.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
EngeströmY.EngeströmR.SuntioA. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In WellsG.ClaxtonG. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st Century (pp. 211–224). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16.
FeenstraH. (2008). Begrijpend lezen groep 6. Handleiding [Reading comprehension group 6. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
17.
FeenstraH.KromR.BerkelS. van (2007). Begrijpend lezen groep 5. Handleiding [Reading comprehension group 5. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
18.
FurnhamA.StephensonR. (2007). Musical distracters, personality type and cognitiveperformance in school children. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 403–420.
19.
FurnhamA.StrbacL. (2002). Music is as distracting as noise: the differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45(3), 203–217.
20.
GardnerH. (2004). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
21.
GeogheganN.MitchelmoreM. (1996). Possible effects of early childhood music on mathematical achievement. Australian Research in Early Childhood Education,1, 1–9.
22.
GordonE. E. (2003). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content, and patterns. A Music Learning Theory. Chicago: GIA.
23.
HallamS.PriceJ.KatsarouG. (2002). The effects of background music on primary school pupils’ task performance. Educational Studies, 28(2), 111–122.
24.
HallamS.PriceJ. (1998). Can the use of background music improve the behaviour and academic performance of children with emotional and behavioural difficulties?British Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 88–91.
25.
HickeyM. (2012). Music outside the lines: Ideas for composing in K–12 music classrooms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HogenesM.van OersB.DiekstraR. F. W. (2010a). Musical Ability Test: Singing. The Hague: The Hague University. Unpublished.
27.
HogenesM.van OersB.DiekstraR. F. W. (2010b). Musical Ability Test: Listening. The Hague: The Hague University. Unpublished.
28.
HogenesM.van OersB.DiekstraR. F. W. (2015). The impact of music on child functioning. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 135, 1507–1526.
29.
HogenesM.van OersB.DiekstraR. F. W. (2014). Music composition in the music curriculum. US-China Education Review A, 2(3), 149–162.
30.
JansenJ.ScheltensF.KraemerJ. M. (2006a). Rekenen-Wiskunde groep 5. Handleiding [Arithmetic- Mathematics group 5. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
31.
JansenJ.ScheltensF.KraemerJ. M. (2006b). Rekenen-Wiskunde groep 6. Handleiding [Arithmetic-Mathematics group 6. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
32.
JonesP. E. (2011). Signs of activity: Integrating language and practical action. Language sciences, 33(1), 11–19
33.
JongenI.KromR.RoumansP. (2009). Technisch lezen groep 5. Handleiding [Technical reading group 5. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
34.
JongenI.KromR.RoumansP. (2010). Technisch lezen groep 6. Handleiding [Technical reading group 6. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.
35.
KaganS. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente: Kagan.
36.
KarpovY. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (2009). Minds on music: Composition for creative and critical thinking. Lanham, MD: MENC.
38.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (2013). Composing our future: Preparing music educators to teach composition. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
KoopmanC. (2005). Muziek maakt slim? Over de rechtvaardiging van muziekonderwijs [Music makes smart? About the justification of music education]. In HerfsJ.van der LeiR.RiksenE.RuttenM. (Eds.), Muziek Leren. Handboek voor basis- en speciaal onderwijs [Learning music. Handbook for elementary and special education] (pp. 19–35). Assen: Van Gorcum.
40.
KoutsoupidouT.HargreavesD.J. (2009). An experimental study of the effects of improvisation on the development of children’s creative thinking in music. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 251–278.
41.
KratusJ. (2012). Nurturing the songcatchers: Philosophical issues in the teaching of music composition. In BowmanW. D.FregaA. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy in music education (pp. 367–385). New York: Oxford University Press.
Leont’evA. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In WertschJ. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
44.
LidzCElliottJ (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications, Vol. 6. New York: JAI Press.
45.
MahnH.John SteinerV. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In WellsG.ClaxtonG. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century. Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46–58). London: Blackwell
46.
MarkovaA. K. (1983). Formirovanie motivacii ucenija v škol’nom vozraste [The formation of motivation to learn during school years]. Moscow, Prosvešcenie.
47.
MarksH. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 20(37), 153–184.
48.
McKelvieP.LowJ. (2002). Listening to Mozart does not improve children’s spatial ability: Final curtains for the Mozart effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 241–258.
49.
PalmerC.MeyerR. K. (2000). Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychological Science, 11(1), 63–68.
50.
ParkhurstH. (1922/2007). Education on the Dalton Plan. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company.
51.
RavenJ. C. (2004). Raven: Standard progressive matrices. Manual. The Netherlands: Pearson Assessment and Information.
52.
RoganJ. C.KeselmanH. J. (1977). Is the ANOVA F-Test robust to variance heterogeneity when sample sizes are equal? An investigation via a coefficient of variation. American Education Research Journal, 21(14), 493–498.
53.
RossiniJ. W.Jr. (2000). A study of the relationship of music instruction and academic achievement among elementary school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Education, Boston College, USA.
54.
RuthmannA. (2007). The composers’ workshop: An approach to composing in the classroom. Music Educators Journal, 93, 38–43.
55.
ScintoL. F. M. (1986). Written language and psychological development. New York: Academic Press.
56.
SchellenbergE. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Research report. Psychological Science, 15(8).
57.
SchellenbergE. G.NakataT.HunterG.TamotoS. (2007). Exposure to music and cognitive performance: tests of children and adults. Psychology of Music, 35(5), 5–19.
58.
SlavinR. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
59.
SlavinR. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research education. What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5–14.
60.
StahlG. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
SternbergR.GrigorenkoE. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TolmanC. (1999). Society versus context in individual development: Does theory make a difference? In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamäkiR. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 70–86). New York, NY: Cambridge University press.
63.
TzurielD. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York/ Dordrecht: Plenum Publishers/Kluwer Academic.
64.
UlfarsdottirL. O.ErwinP. G. (1999). The influence of music on social cognitive skills. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 26(2), 81–84.
65.
van OersB. (2005). Dwarsdenken. Essays over Ontwikkelingsgericht Onderwijs [Cross thinking. Essays on Developmental Education]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
66.
VygotskyL. S. (1978a). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
VygotskyL. S. (1978b). The prehistory of written language. In VygotskyL. S., Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 105–119). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
VygotskyL. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk: Sharpe.
69.
WallerG. D. (2007). The impact of music education on academic achievement, attendance rate, and student conduct on the 2006 senior class in one Southeast Virginia Public School division. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
70.
WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.). (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
WigginsJ. (1990). Composition in the classroom: A tool for teaching. Reston: MENC.
72.
ZachopoulouaE.TsapakidoubA.DerricV. (2004). The effects of a developmentally appropriate music and movement program on motor performance. Early Childhood Research, 19, 631–642.
