We tested the level of agreement between the self and other ratings for honesty–humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness to experience (HEXACO-PI [R]) in a sample of 100 managerial executives from India, along with their co-employees. It is our endeavour to understand whether the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and personality, measured through HEXACO, varies across the personality-rating source. Using a survey method comprising a 21-item questionnaire, we noted that all the six HEXACO dimensions had high and significant self–other agreement. Interestingly, the highest correlation was observed for conscientiousness, while the lowest correlation was for openness to experience. However, the relationship between HEXACO and OCB differed across different rating sources. Further, HEXACO, as rated by co-workers, did seem to have a better explanatory power than self-rated HEXACO, in predicting OCB. Importantly, the observed relationships between self and co-worker-related personality and OCB have been explained through the socio-analytic theory and the trait visibility theory. Based on our analysis, we assume that the psychometric properties of the HEXACO scale can be generalized in the Indian context. However, for work-related behaviour, personality rating by a co-worker is a better predictor than global self-rating.
AllenT., BarnardS., RushM., & RussellJ. (2000) Ratings of organizational citizenship behaviour: Does the source make a difference?Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 97–114.
2.
AnglimJ., LievensF., EvertonL., GrantS. L., & MartyA. (2018). HEXACO personality predicts counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour in low-stakes and job applicant contexts. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 11–20.
3.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353.
4.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
5.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2018). How well do Big Five measures capture HEXACO scale variance?Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 567–573.
6.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & de VriesR. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.
7.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & GoldbergL. R. (2004a). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87,707–721.
8.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., PeruginiM., SzarotaP., De VriesR. E., Di BlasL.,BoiesK.,& De RaadB. (2004b). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.
9.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., de VriesR. E., HendrickseJ., & BornM. P. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(5), 641–659.
10.
BarrickM. R., & MountM. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
11.
BarrickM. R., MountM. K., & JudgeT. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 9–30.
12.
BingM. N., & LounsburyJ. W. (2000). Openness and job performance in US-based Japanese manufacturing companies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 515–522.
13.
BormanW. C., & MotowidloS. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In SchmittN., & BormanW. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). Jossey-Bass.
14.
BormanW. C., PennerL. A., AllenT. D., & MotowidloS. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 52–69.
15.
BourdageJ. S., LeeK., LeeJ. H., & ShinK. H. (2012). Motives for organizational citizenship behaviour: Personality correlates and coworker ratings of OCB. Human Performance, 25(3), 179–200.
16.
BourdageJ. S., GoupalA., NeilsonT., LukacikE. R., & LeeN. (2018). Personality, equity sensitivity, and discretionary workplace behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 144–150.
17.
BrinkE. R. (2014). The relationships between the HEXACO personality dimensions and organisational citizenship behaviours within the civil engineering sector (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch University.
18.
CheungF. M., van de VijverF. J., & LeongF. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603.
19.
ConnollyJ. J., KavanaghE. J., & ViswesvaranC. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117.
DawisR. V., & LofquistL. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. University of Minnesota Press.
22.
De VriesR. E., LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2008). The Dutch HEXACO personality inventory: Psychometric properties, self–other agreement, and relations with psychopathy among low and high acquaintanceship dyads. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 142–151.
23.
DigmanJ. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.
24.
ElanainH. M. A. (2007). The five-factor model of personality and organizational citizenship behaviour in United Arab Emirates. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 72(3), 47.
25.
FeherA., & VernonP. A. (2021). Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110002.
26.
FunderD. C., & ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 149–158.
27.
FunderD. C., & DobrothK. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 409–418.
28.
GarcíaL. F., AlujaA., RossierJ., OstendorfF., GlicksohnJ., OumarB., BellajT., RuchW., WangW., KöviZ., ŚcigałaD., ČekrlijaĐ., StiversA. W., Di BlasL., ValdiviaM., JemaaS. B., AtitsogbeK. A., & HansenneM. (2021). Exploring the stability of HEXACO-60 structure and the association of Gender, Age, and Social Position with personality traits across 18 countries. Journal of Personality.
29.
GoldbergL. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
30.
, Hair JrJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
31.
HofsteeW. K. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality?European Journal of Personality, 8(3), 149–162.
32.
HoganR. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 163–179). Guilford Press.
33.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
34.
HurtzG. M., & DonovanJ. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869–879.
35.
IliesR., ScottB. A., & JudgeT. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561–575.
36.
IliesR., FulmerI. S., SpitzmullerM., & JohnsonM. D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 945–959.
37.
IonA., IliescuD., AldhafriS., RanaN., RatanadilokK., WidyantiA., & NedelceaC. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of personality structure through the lens of the HEXACO model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(1), 25–34.
38.
JudgeT. A., & BonoJ. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765.
39.
JudgeT. A., HellerD., & MountM. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
40.
LapierreL. M., & HackettR. D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 539–554.
41.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.
42.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1001–1054.
43.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2016). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25, 543–556.
44.
LeeY., BerryC. M., & Gonzalez-MuléE. (2019). The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1535–1546.
45.
LePineJ. A., & Van DyneL. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326–336.
46.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.
47.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In BoyleG., MatthewsG., & SaklofskeD. (Eds.), Sage Handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273)–294). SAGE Publications.
48.
McCraeR. R., , Costa JrP. T., & MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270.
49.
MotowidloS. J., & Van ScotterJ. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480.
50.
MountM. K., BarrickM. R., & StraussJ. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272–280.
51.
OhI. S., WangG., & MountM. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762–773.
52.
OhI.-S., LeH., WhitmanD. S., KimK., YooT.-Y., HwangJ.-O., & KimC.-S. (2014). The incremental validity of honesty–humility over cognitive ability and the Big Five personality traits. Human Performance, 27, 206–224.
53.
OnesD. S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18(4), 389–404.
54.
OostromJ. K., De VriesR. E., & de WitM. (2019). Development and validation of a HEXACO situational judgment test. Human Performance, 32(1), 1–29.
55.
OrganD. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behaviour: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath.
56.
OrganD. W., & RyanK. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behaviour. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802.
57.
PletzerJ. L., OostromJ. K., & de VriesR. E. (2021). HEXACO personality and organizational citizenship behaviour: A domain-and facet-level meta-analysis. Human Performance, 34(2), 126–147.
58.
RipleyA. (2019). Examining the utility of the HEXACO-PI-R for predicting positive and negative indicators of police officer performance (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
59.
SalgadoJ. F. (1998). Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11(2–3), 271–288.
60.
SinghA. P., GuptaV. K., DubeyA. P., & SinghA. K. (2017). The role of work-family culture and personality traits in organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) of first-level managerial personnel. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16(1), 58–71.
61.
SmallE. E., & DiefendorffJ. M. (2006). The impact of contextual self-ratings and observer ratings of personality on the personality–performance relationship 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 297–320.
62.
SzabóZ. P., CziborA., RestásP., & BereczkeiT. (2018). ‘The Darkest of all’ the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and organizational citizenship behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 352–356.
63.
WatsonD., HubbardB., & WieseD. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 546–558.
64.
WigginsJ. S. (Ed.). (1996). The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press.
65.
WilliamsL. J., & AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
66.
WingateT. G., LeeC. S., & BourdageJ. S. (2019). Who helps and why? Contextualizing organizational citizenship behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 51(3), 147–158.
67.
ZettlerI., ThielmannI., HilbigB. E., & MoshagenM. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
