While worker cooperatives aim to achieve both solidaristic and social goals, there is less understanding of how the democratic structure of worker cooperatives interacts with an inclusive work environment among differently motivated and empowered workers. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring how democratic arrangements in the workplace contribute to the inclusion of marginalised workers through an analysis of Worker Co-ops in Japan—a network of worker cooperatives with roots in a job-creation movement by unemployed workers which has expanded in the realm of care. The study shows how Worker Co-ops have reinterpreted democracy as a cooperative practice of institutionalising the relational conditions for drawing out the perspectives of others and provides insights into how this also enables them collectively to resist dominant societal narratives that contribute to their marginalisation.
AbeA (2023) Child poverty policies in Japan: familial welfare state in transition?. In: IzuharaM (ed) A Research Agenda for East Asian Social Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 103–125.
2.
ArendtH (2023[1969]) On Violence. Penguin Books.
3.
BattilanaJYenJFerrerasI, et al. (2022) Democratizing work: redistributing power in organizations for a democratic and sustainable future. Organization Theory3(1). DOI: 10.1177/26317877221084714.
4.
BattilaniPSchröterHG (2012) The Cooperative Business Movement, 1950 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Ben-NerAJonesDC (1995) Employee participation, ownership, and productivity: a theoretical framework. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society34(4): 532–554.
6.
BerryDBellMP (2018) Worker cooperatives: alternative governance for caring and precarious work. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal37(4): 376–391.
7.
BirchallJ (2012) The comparative advantages of member-owned businesses. Review of Social Economy70(3): 263–294.
8.
BonoliG (2005) The politics of the new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy & Politics33(3): 431–449.
9.
BourgaultS (2020) Democratic practice and ‘caring to deliberate’: a Gadamerian account of conversation and listening. In: UrbanPWardL (eds) Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 31–51.
10.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
11.
BurdínGDeanA (2009) New evidence on wages and employment in worker cooperatives compared with capitalist firms. Journal of Comparative Economics37(4): 517–533.
12.
Cabinet Office. (2022) Survey on the awareness and lifestyles of children and young people.
13.
CheneyGSanta CruzIPeredoAM, et al. (2014) Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization21(5): 591–603.
14.
ChristianoT (2008) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
ConnellySMarkeySRoselandM (2011) Bridging sustainability and the social economy: achieving community transformation through local food initiatives. Critical Social Policy31(2): 308–324.
16.
DahlRA (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science2(3): 201–215.
17.
DufaysFO’SheaNHuybrechtsB, et al. (2020) Resisting colonization: worker cooperatives’ conceptualization and behaviour in a Habermasian perspective. Work, Employment and Society34(6): 965–984.
18.
EndoC (2023) Structural change through ‘collective action as democratic practice’: linking grassroots democracy with social justice. Political Studies72(4): 1354–1372.
19.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GheausAHerzogL (2016) The goods of work (other than money!). Journal of Social Philosophy47(1): 70–89.
21.
GraefeP (2001) Whose social economy? Debating new state practices in Quebec. Critical Social Policy21(1): 35–58.
22.
HeldV (2006) The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HoriguchiS (2012) Hikikomori: how private isolation caught the public eye. In: GoodmanRImotoYToivonenT (eds) A Sociology of Japanese Youth: From Returnees to NEETs. Abingdon: Routledge, 122–138.
24.
IwataM (2017) Hinkon no seiji-shi: hinkon no katachi wa do kawattanoka (The History of Postwar Poverty: How Has the Shape of Poverty Changed). Chikuma-shobo.
KimS (2015) Street-level struggles against marketisation: a case study of nonprofits in a South Korean workfare partnership programme. Critical Social Policy35(2): 207–227.
27.
KittayEF (1999) Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
28.
KleinS (2022) Democracy requires organized collective power. Journal of Political Philosophy30(1): 26–47.
29.
KokkinidisG (2015) Spaces of possibilities: workers’ self-management in Greece. Organization22(6): 847–871.
30.
KuboY (2020) Workers’ cooperatives as a solution to social exclusion in Japan. In: AltmanMJensenAKurimotoA, et al. (eds) Waking the Asian Pacific Co-Operative Potential. Academic Press, pp. 355–363.
31.
LangmeadK (2017) Challenging the degeneration thesis: the role of democracy in worker cooperatives?The Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity5(1): 79–98.
32.
MackenzieC (2014) The importance of relational autonomy and capabiities for an ethics of vulnerability. In: MackenzieCRogersWDoddsS (eds) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 33–59.
33.
MackenzieCStoljarN (2000) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
MajeeWHoytA (2009) Building community trust through cooperatives: a case study of a worker-owned homecare cooperative. Journal of Community Practice17(4): 444–463.
35.
MatthewRABransburgV (2017) Democratizing caring labor: the promise of community-based, worker-owned childcare cooperatives. Affilia32(1): 10–23.
36.
MeyersJSM (2022) Working Democracies: Managing Inequality in Worker Cooperatives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
37.
MeyersJSMVallasSP (2016) Diversity regimes in worker cooperatives: workplace inequality under conditions of worker control. The Sociological Quarterly57(1): 98–128.
38.
MiyachiK (2014) Nihon ni okeru shitsugyo taisaku jigyo saiko: Shitsugyo-sha no koyo/seikatsu mondai wo chushin ni (Reconsideration on relief works for the unemployed in Japan). Journal of Economics115(2): 29–49.
39.
OtakaK (2017) From “employed work” to “associated work” in a diverse society: a challenge of social enterprise in creating a new paradigm of community development learning through works with multi-stakeholders. Asia Pacific Education Review18(2): 235–242.
40.
PuusaAHokkilaKVarisA (2016) Individuality vs. communality: a new dual role of co-operatives?Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management4(1): 22–30.
41.
ShizumeMKatoMMatsudaR (2021) A corporate-centred conservative welfare regime: three-layered protection in Japan. Journal of Asian Public Policy14(1): 110–133.
42.
WebbTCheneyG (2014) Worker-owned-and-governed co-operatives and the wider co-operative movement. In: ParkerMCheneyGFournierV, et al. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 64–88.
43.
WiksellK (2020) Worker cooperatives for social change: knowledge-making through constructive resistance within the capitalist market economy. Journal of Political Power13(2): 201–216.
