QSAR regression models of the toxicity of triazoles and benzotriazoles ([B]TAZs) to an alga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), Daphnia magna and a fish (Onchorhynchus mykiss), were developed by five partners in the FP7-EU Project, CADASTER. The models were developed by different methods —Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Partial Least Squares (PLS), Bayesian regularised regression and Associative Neural Network (ASNN) — by using various molecular descriptors (DRAGON, PaDEL-Descriptor and QSPR-THESAURUS web). In addition, different procedures were used for variable selection, validation and applicability domain inspection. The predictions of the models developed, as well as those obtained in a consensus approach by averaging the data predicted from each model, were compared with the results of experimental tests that were performed by two CADASTER partners. The individual and consensus models were able to correctly predict the toxicity classes of the chemicals tested in the CADASTER project, confirming the utility of the QSAR approach. The models were also used for the prediction of aquatic toxicity of over 300 (B)TAZs, many of which are included in the REACH pre-registration list, and were without experimental data. This highlights the importance of QSAR models for the screening and prioritisation of untested chemicals, in order to reduce and focus experimental testing.
Anon. (undated). CAse studies on the Development and Application of in-SilicoTechniques for Environmental hazard and Risk assessment. Available at: www.cadaster.eu (Accessed 16.11.12).
2.
European Parliament (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European UnionL396, 30.12.2006, 1–849.
3.
WolschkeH., XieZ., MöllerA., SturmR., & EbinghausR. (2011). Occurrence, distribution and fluxes of benzotriazoles along the German large river basins into the North Sea. Water Research45, 6259–6266.
4.
CancillaD., MartinezJ., & Van AggelenG. (1998). Detection of aircraft deicing/antiicing fluid additives in a perched water monitoring well at an international airport. Environmental Science & Technology32, 3834–3835.
5.
OECD (2004). OECD Principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationship Models, 2 pp. Paris, France: 37th Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf (Accessed 16.11.12).
6.
BhhataraiB., & GramaticaP. (2011). Modelling physicochemical properties of (benzo)triazoles, and screening for environmental partitioning. Water Research45, 1463–1471.
7.
GramaticaP., CassaniS., RoyP.P., KovarichS., YapC.W., & PapaE. (2012). QSAR modelling is not “push a button and find a correlation”: A case study of toxicity of (benzo-)triazoles on algae. Molecular Informatics11–12, 817–835.
YapC.W. (2011). PaDEL-Descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. Journal of Computational Chemistry32, 1466–1474.
DurjavaM., KolarB., ArnusL., PapaE., KovarichS., SahlinU., & PeijnenburgW. (2013). Experimental assessment of the environmental fate and effects of triazoles and benzotriazole. ATLA41, 65–75.
14.
ZhuH., TropshaA., FourchesD., VarnekA., PapaE., GramaticaP., ÖbergT., DaoP., CherkasovA., & TetkoI.V. (2008). Combinational QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyri-formis. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling48, 766–784.
15.
GramaticaP., PiluttiP., & PapaE. (2004). Validated QSAR prediction of OH tropospheric degradability: Splitting into training-test set and consensus modeling. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Science44, 1794–1802.
European Commission (1991). Directive 67/548/ EEC (Annex VI). General Classification and Labelling Requirements for Dangerous Substances and Preparations. Official Journal of the European UnionL180, 09.07.1991, 1–79.
19.
ChiricoN., PapaE., KovarichS., CassaniS., & GramaticaP. (2012). QSARINS: Software for QSAR MLR Model Development and Validation, 8 pp. Varese, Italy: University of Insubria. Available at: http://dipbsf.uninsubria.it/qsar/news/QSARINS_swGram.pdf (Accessed 15.12.12).
20.
GramaticaP. (2007). Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external. QSAR & Combinatorial Science26, 694–701.
21.
GasteigerJ., & ZupanJ. (1993). Neural networks in chemistry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English32, 503–527.
22.
ShiM., FangH., TongW., WuJ., PerkinsR., BlairR.M., BranhamW.S., DialS.L., MolandC.L., & SheehanD.M. (2001). QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Sciences41, 186–195.
23.
SchüürmannG., EbertR.U., ChenJ., WangB., & KühneR. (2008). External validation and prediction employing the predictive squared correlation coefficient test set activity mean vs training set activity mean. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling48, 2140–2145.
24.
ConsonniV., BallabioD., & TodeschiniR. (2010). Evaluation of model predictive ability by external validation techniques. Journal of Chemometrics24, 194–201.
25.
ChiricoN., & GramaticaP. (2011). Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling51, 2320–2335.
26.
ChiricoN., & GramaticaP. (2012). Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling52, 2044–2058.