In this article, we review the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS) Curriculum Model, its applications in program development, and research carried out on its effectiveness. The EPTS Curriculum Model, an enrichment model, was developed to differentiate regular curriculum and to design new curriculum for gifted students. It is a two-component model. The first component includes content standards at four levels. The second component is composed of three-stratum ability skills. Besides the EPTS Curriculum Model, the EPTS Curriculum Differentiator is used as a method to make acceleration and enrichment together in regular curriculum. The Differentiator has seven regions. Each region provides a different means to make differentiations in regular curriculum.
AvciG (2015) Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları değerlendirmeleri öğrenci formunun (üyep-döf) revize edilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması [Revision of the Education Programs for Talented Students evaluations-student form and its psychometric properties]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Tepebaşı, Eskisehir.
2.
AyasMB (2012) ÜYEP fen bilimleri müfredatının değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the UYEP science programs]. 3. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey.
3.
AyasMBBal-SezerelB (2013) ÜYEP fen bilimleri ve matematik programlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of EPTS Science and Math Programs]. Third International Conference on Talent Development and Excellence, Antalya, Turkey.
4.
BanksJAClegAA (1990) Teaching strategies for the social studies: Inquiry, valuing, and decision-making, 4th ed. New York: Longman.
5.
BorlandJH (1989) Planning and implementing programs for the gifted and talented. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
EricssonKANandagopalKRoringRW (2005) Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted28(3–4): 287–311.
7.
GruberHMandlH (2000) Instructional psychology and the gifted. In: HellerKAMönksFJSternbergRJ, et al. (eds) International handbook of giftedness and talent, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 383–396.
8.
KimM (2016) A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly60(2): 102–116.
9.
KulikJAKulikCC (1992) Meta analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly36(2): 73–77.
10.
LefebvreCComrieBCohenH (eds) (2013) New perspectives on the origin of language. Studies in Language Companion Series, Book 144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
11.
MakerCJ (1982) Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen System Corporation.
12.
MakerCJSchieverSW (2010) Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
13.
RenzulliJSReisSM (2000) The schoolwide enrichment model. In: HellerKAMönksFJSternbergRJ, et al. (eds) International handbook of giftedness and talent, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 367–382.
14.
Sağlam-DemirKAksoy-PehlivanT (2013) Anabilim UYEP modelinin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik gelişimleri üzerindeki etkisi [The effects of the Anabilim UYEP model on gifted students’ academic development]. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Talent Development and Excellence, Antalya, Turkey.
15.
SakU (2009a) Test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) for the identification of mathematically gifted students. Roeper Review31(1): 53–67.
16.
SakU (2009b) Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları [Education Programs for Talented Students]. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
17.
SakU (2011) An overview of the social validity of the Education Programs for Talented Students model (EPTS). Education and Science36: 213–229.
18.
SakU (2012) Üstün zekalılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri, 2. Baskı [The gifted: characteristics, identification and education, 2nd ed.]. Ankara: Vize yayıncılık.
19.
SakU (2013) Education Programs for Talented Students model (EPTS) and its effectiveness on gifted students’ mathematical creativity. Education and Science38(169): 51–61.
20.
SakU (2016) EPTS curriculum model in the education of gifted students. Annals of Psychology32(3): 683–694.
21.
SakU (2019) Özel yetenekliler taslak öğretim programları [Special curriculum for gifted students]. 4. Ulusal Üstün Zekalı ve Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi Panel Bildirisi, İstanbul, Turkey.
22.
SakUAkyolGSağlam-DemirK, et al. (2014) Anabilim EPTS model: a special program model for self-contained classrooms for the gifted in Turkey. Paper presented at 14th International ECHA Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
23.
SakUDemirel-GürbüzSBal-SezerelB, et al. (2013) Dünden bugüne ÜYEP: Bilimsel araştırmalar ve uygulamalar [UYEP from yesterday to today: research and practices on UYEP]. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Talent Development & Excellence, Antalya, Turkey.
24.
SakUKarabacakF (2010) What research says about the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS). 12th ECHA Conference, Paris, France.
25.
SakUKarabacakFKılıçA (2009) Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları (üyep): tanılama. Öğretim ve Değerlendirme Biçimleri ve Programın Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Etkileri [Education Programs for Talented Students (UYEP): identification, teaching and assessment]. Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar II. Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir, Turkey.
26.
SakU (2014) ÜYEP modeli: üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi akıl oyunları değildir [UYEP model: education for gifted students is not a mind-game]. 4. Ulusal Üstün Zekalı ve Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi Panel Bildirisi, İstanbul, Turkey.
27.
StanleyJS (1977) Rationale of the study of mathematically precocious youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In: StanleyJCGeorgeWCSolanoCH (eds) The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 75–112.
28.
Steenbergen-HuSMoonSM (2011) The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: a meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly55(1): 39–53.
29.
SternbergRJ (1997) Successful Intelligence. New York: Plume.
30.
SternbergRJGrigorenkoEL (2000) Teaching for Successful Intelligence. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
31.
SternbergRJGrigorenkoEL (2007) Teaching for Successful Intelligence, 2nd ed. Arlington Heights, IL: SkyLight.
32.
TomlinsonCA (2009) Myth 8: the “patch-on” approach to programming is effective. Gifted Child Quarterly53(4): 254–256.
33.
Van Tassel-BaskaJEFBrownEF (2007) Toward best practice: an analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly51: 342–358.
34.
VanTassel-BaskaJ (1998) A comprehensive model of program development. In: VanTassel-BaskaJ (ed) Excellence in Educating Gifted and Talented Learners. Denver: Love, pp. 309–334.
35.
VanTassel-BaskaJ (2000) Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In: HellerKAMönksFJSternbergRJ, et al. (eds) International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 345–365.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
