This article investigates native speakers’ attitudes toward accent variation in Netherlandic Standard Dutch. Adopting the speaker evaluation paradigm, a demographically controlled sample of listener-judges rated spontaneous speech samples that are representative of four regions in the Netherlands, and from which potentially competing linguistic cues (e.g., pitch and intonation) had not been removed. Speech stimuli were rated on a set of scales integrated from among previous studies conducted in the Low Countries. Regionally marked standard accents activated distinct attitude profiles that were largely invariant with respect to the age, gender, level of education, and regional provenance of the listener-judges. It is argued that these regionally flavored standard varieties were found to be more than social categorization cues: Data reveal that an accent elicits perceptions of its so-called intrinsic euphony and norm status in addition to the status and integrity of its speakers.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M.A. ( 1987). Language attitudes, frames of reference, and social identity: A Scottish dimension. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 6, 201-213.
2.
Adank, P., Van Hout, R., & Van de Velde, H. (2007). An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch II: Regional Varieties . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1130-1141.
3.
Bradac, J.J. ( 1990). Language attitudes and impression formation. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 387-412). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4.
Brown, B.L., Giles, H., & Thakerar, J.N. (1985). Speaker evaluation as a function of speech rate, accent, and context. Language and Communication, 5, 207-220.
5.
Cargile, A.C., Giles, H., Ryan, E.B., & Bradac, J.J. ( 1994). Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language and Communication, 14, 211-236.
6.
Crystal, D. ( 1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Deumert, A., & Vandenbussche, W. (2003). Standard languages: Taxonomies and histories. In A. Deumert & W. Vandenbussche (Eds.), Germanic standardizations, past to present (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam: Benjamins .
8.
De Schutter, G. ( 1980). Norm en normgevoelens bij Nederlandstaligen in België [Norm and normative feelings for speakers of Dutch in Belgium]. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 73, 93-109.
9.
Devos, T. ( 2008). Implicit attitudes 101. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 61-84). New York: Psychology Press.
10.
Doeleman, R. ( 1998). Native reactions to nonnative speech. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press .
11.
Garrett, P. ( 2005). Attitude measurements. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (Vol. 2, pp. 1251-1260). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
12.
Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A. ( 2003). Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.
13.
Giles, H. ( 1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 22, 211-227.
14.
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. ( 1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15.
Grondelaers, S., & Van Hout, R. (in press). Is Standard Dutch with a regional accent standard or not?Evidence from native speakers’ attitudes.
16.
Grondelaers, S., Van Hout, R., Steegs, M. ( 2009). Do explicit social cues level perceptual differences between accents in Netherlandic Standard Dutch? In A. Backus, M. Keijzer, I. Vedder, & B. Weltens (Eds.), Artikelen van de Zesde Anéla-Conferentie (pp. 112-121). Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.
17.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. ( 2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Heijmer, T., & Vonk, R. ( 2002). Effecten van een regionaal accent op de beoordeling van de spreker [Effects of a regional accent on the evaluation of the speaker] . Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 57, 108-113.
19.
Impe, L., & Speelman, D. ( 2007). Vlamingen en hun (tussen)taal. Een attitudineel mixed guise onderzoek [The Flemish and their (inter)language. An attitudinal mixed guise investigation]. Handelingen van de Koninklijke Maatschappij voor Taal-en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis, 16, 109-128.
20.
Jörgensen, J.N., & Quist, P. ( 2001). Native speakers’ judgments of second language Danish . Language Awareness, 10, 41-56.
21.
Kloeke, G.G. ( 1951). Gezag en norm bij het gebruik van Verzorgd Nederlands [Authority and norm in the use of Civilized Dutch]. Amsterdam , The Netherlands: Meulenhoff.
22.
Kristiansen, T. ( 2001). Two standards: One for the media, and one for the school . Language Awareness, 10, 9-24.
23.
Ladegaard, H.J. ( 2001). Popular perceptions of standard language: Attitudes to "regional standards" in Denmark. Language Awareness, 10, 25-40.
24.
Lambert, W.E., Frankel, H., & Tucker, G.R. ( 1966). Judging personality through speech: A French-Canadian example. Journal of Communication, 16, 305-321.
25.
Lambert, W.E., Hodgson, R.C., Gardner, R.C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluative reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 66, 44-51.
26.
Mulac, A., Hanley, T.D., & Prigge, D.Y. ( 1974). Effects of phonological speech foreignness upon three dimensions of attitude of selectedAmerican listeners. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 411-420.
27.
Musterd, S., & De Pater, B. ( 1994). Randstad Holland. Internationaal, regionaal, lokaal. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
28.
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tanenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning . Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Ray, G., & Zahn, C. ( 1999). Language attitudes and speech behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 310-319.
30.
Smakman, D. ( 2006). Standard Dutch in the Netherlands: A sociolinguistic and phonetic description. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: LOT-Publications.
31.
Smakman, D., & Van Bezooijen, R. (1997). Een verkenning van populaire ideeën over de standaardtaal in Nederland [An exploration of popular ideas about the standard language in The Netherlands]. Taal en Tongval (The manummer 10: Standaardisering in Noord en Zuid), 126-139
32.
Van Bezooijen, R. ( 1988). The relative importance of pronunciation, prosody and voice quality for the attribution of social status and personality characteristics . In R. Van Hout & U. Knops (Eds.), Language attitudes in the Dutch language area (pp. 85-103). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
33.
Van Bezooijen, R. ( 2002). Aesthetic evaluation of Dutch. Comparisons across dialects, accents, and languages. In D. Long & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (Vol. 2, pp. 13-30). Amsterdam , the Netherlands: Benjamins.
34.
Van Haeringen, C.B. ( 1924). Eenheid en nuance in beschaafdnederlandse uitspraak [Unity and nuance in civilized Dutch pronunciation]. De Nieuwe Taalgids18, 65-86.
35.
Van Hout, R., G. De Schutter, E. De Crom, W. Huinck, H. Kloots & H. Van de Velde ( 1999). De uitspraak van het Standaard-Nederlands. Variatie en varianten in Vlaanderen en Nederland [The pronunciation of Standard Dutch. Variation and variants in Flanders and The Netherlands]. In E. Huls & B. Weltens (Eds.), Artikelen van de derde sociolinguïstische conferentie [Articles of the third sociolinguistic conference] (pp. 183-196). Delft: Eburon.
36.
Van de Velde, H., & Houtermans, M. (1999). Vlamingen en Nederlanders over de uitspraak van nieuwslezers [The Flemish and the Dutch on the pronunciation of newsreaders]. In E. Huls & B. Weltens (Eds.), Artikelen van de derde sociolinguïstische conferentie [Articles of the third sociolinguistic conference] (pp. 451-462). Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.
37.
Weijnen, A.A. ( 1946). De grenzen tussen de Oost-Noordbrabantse dialecten onderling [The mutual boundaries between the Eastern North-Brabantic dialects]. In A. A. Weijnen, J. M. Renders, & J. van Ginneken (Eds.), Bijdragen en mededelingen der dialectencommissie van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam [Contributions and announcements of the dialect commission of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences in Amsterannouncements ofthe dialect commission ofthe Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences inAmsterdam] (pp. 8-15). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen .
38.
Wilson, J., & Bayard, D. ( 1992). Accent, gender, and the elderly listener: Evaluation of NZE and other English accents by rest home residents. Te Reo, 35, 19-56.
39.
Zahn, C.J., & Hopper, R. ( 1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113-123.
