This paper considers how the technocracy contributes to the mobilisation of policy, and in doing so suggests that this allows for a systematic explanation for policy mobility that is based on a particular form of expert practice rather than ideologies such as neoliberalism. It argues that the technocracy has topographies through which different places are materially connected and through which policy knowledge flows in various forms. But it also has topologies that emerge from the practice of measurement through which often distant places can be made to loom much larger, or nearby places fade into insignificance. Together they help to materialise the spaces ‘in between’ policy-making sites through which policy is often transferred. Considering the technocracy in this way demonstrates how apparently autonomous political–economic contexts shape patterns of policy mobility and state change.
BerndtCBoecklerM (2009) Geographies of circulation and exchange: Constructions of markets. Progress in Human Geography33: 535–551.
9.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks10: 182–222.
10.
BreslauD (2003) Economics invents the economy: Mathematics, statistics, and models in the work of Irving Fisher and Wesley Mitchell. Theory and Society32: 279–411.
11.
BunnellTDasD (2010) Urban pulse—A geography of serial seduction: Urban policy transfer from Kuala Lumpur to Hyderabad. Urban Geography31: 277–284.
12.
CentenoMA (1993) The New Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society22: 307–335.
13.
ChristophersB (2013) Banking Across Boundaries: Placing Finance in Capitalism, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
ClarkeN (2012) Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography36: 25–43.
15.
CleggL (2010) Our dream is a world full of poverty indicators: The US, the World Bank, and the power of numbers. New Political Economy15: 473–492.
16.
CochraneAWardK (2012) Researching the geographies of policy mobility: Confronting the methodological challenges. Environment and Planning A44: 5–12.
17.
CohenD (2015) Grounding mobile policies: Ad hoc networks and the creative city in Bandung, Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography36: 23–37.
18.
CollierSJ (2009) Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond ‘Governmentality’. Theory Culture Society26: 78–108.
19.
CollierSJOngA (2005) Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In: OngACollierSJ (eds) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Malden: Blackwell, pp. 3–21.
20.
CookIRWardK (2012) Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready’. European Urban and Regional Studies19: 137–152.
21.
DeanM (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.
22.
DolowitzDPMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance—An International Journal of Policy and Administration13: 5–24.
DuffC (2010) On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28: 881–895.
25.
DuPuisEMGareauBJ (2008) Neoliberal knowledge: The decline of technocracy and the weakening of the Montreal Protocol. Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell)89: 1212–1229.
26.
DurandC (2014) Contradictions of global neoliberalism. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology13: 36–42.
27.
EldenS (2007) Govemmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D-Society & Space25: 562–580.
28.
EscobarA (1994) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
FergusonJ (1994) The Anti-politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization and Bureacratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
FourcadeM (2006) The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology112: 145–194.
31.
GeddieK (2015) Policy mobilities in the race for talent: Competitive state strategies in international student mobility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40: 235–248.
32.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K (1996) The End of Capitalism (As We Know It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
33.
GoldmanM (2007) How “water for all!” policy became hegemonic: The power of the World Bank and its transnational policy networks. Geoforum38: 786–800.
34.
GrahamMSheltonT (2013) Geography and the future of big data, big data and the future of geography. Dialogues in Human Geography3: 255–261.
35.
GunnellJG (1982) The technocratic image and the theory of technocracy. Technology and Culture23: 392–316.
36.
HaasPM (1992) Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization46: 1–35.
37.
HongB (2014) National cultural indicators in New Zealand. Cultural Trends23: 93–108.
38.
JacobsJM (2012) Urban geographies I: Still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography36: 412–422.
39.
JocoyCL (2013) Counting the homeless: The culture of quantification in American social policy. Cultural Geographies20: 397–403.
KobayashiA (2009) Situated knowledge, reflexivity. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 138–143.
42.
KuusM (2015) Transnational bureaucracies: How do we know what they know?Progress in Human Geography39: 432–448.
43.
LangleyP (2009) Debt, discipline, and government: Foreclosure and forbearance in the subprime mortgage crisis. Environment and Planning A41: 1404–1419.
LarnerWLaurieN (2010) Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum41: 218–226.
46.
LarnerWLe HeronR (2002) The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method. Environment and Planning D-Society & Space20: 753–774.
47.
LathamA (2011) Topologies and the multiplicities of space-time. Dialogues in Human Geography1: 312–315.
48.
LawJMolA (2001) Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D-Society & Space19: 609–621.
49.
LiTM (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
50.
LouthJ (2015) Neoliberalising Cambodia: The production of capacity in Southeast Asia. Globalizations12: 400–419.
51.
MarcuseH (1991) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, London: Routledge.
52.
MartinLSecorAJ (2014) Towards a post-mathematical topology. Progress in Human Geography38: 420–438.
53.
McCannE (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101: 107–130.
54.
McCannEJ (2008) Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A40: 885–904.
55.
McCannEJWardK (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policy-Making in the Global Age, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
56.
McCannEWardK (2010) Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum41: 175–184.
57.
McCannEWardK (2012) Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A44: 42–51.
58.
McCormackD (2015) Governing inflation: Price and atmospheres of emergency. Theory, Culture & Society32: 131–154.
59.
McCormackDP (2012) Governing economic futures through the war on inflation. Environment and Planning A44: 1536–1553.
60.
McFarlaneC (2011) On context. City15: 375–388.
61.
MillerPRoseN (2008) Governing the Present, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
62.
MirowskiP (2013) Never Let a Serious Crisis Go To Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown, London and New York: Verso.
63.
MirowskiPPlehweD (2009) The Road From Mount Pelorin: The making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
MitchellT (1999) Society, economy and the state effect. In: SteinmetzG (ed.) State/Culture: State Formation After the Cultural Turn, Ithaca, New York and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 76–97.
65.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
MolALawJ (1994) Regions, networks and fluids – Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science24: 641–671.
67.
MosseD (2011) Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
68.
OngA (2007) Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 3–8.
69.
PainterJ (2010) Rethinking territory. Antipode42: 1090–1118.
70.
PeckJ (2010) Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
PeckJ (2012) Recreative city: Amsterdam, vehicular ideas and the adaptive spaces of creativity policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36: 462–485.
PhelpsNABunnellTMillerMA (2014) Urban inter-referencing within and beyond a decentralized Indonesia. Cities39: 37–49.
78.
PhongpaichitPBakerC (2014) A short account of the rise and fall of the Thai technocracy. Southeast Asian Studies3: 283.
79.
PooveyM (1998) A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
80.
PorterTM (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
81.
PowCP (2014) License to travel: Policy assemblage and the ‘Singapore model’. City18: 287–306.
82.
PrinceR (2012) Metaphors of policy mobility: Fluid spaces of ‘creativity’ policy. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography94: 317–331.
83.
PrinceR (2013) Disaggregating the state: Exploring interdisciplinary possibilities for the study of policy. Political Geography34: 60–62.
84.
PrinceR (2014) Topologies of mobile policy: Neoliberalism and creativity. In: RocheMMMansveltJPrinceR (eds) Engaging Geographies: Landscapes, Lifecourses and Mobilities, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 191–206.
85.
PrinceRKearnsRCraigD (2006) Governmentality, discourse and space in the New Zealand health care system, 1991-2003. Health & Place12: 253–266.
86.
PutnamRD (1977) Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy. Comparative Political Studies10: 383–412.
87.
RingPJ (2010) Governance and governmentality: A discussion in the context of UK private pension provision. Economy and Society39: 534–550.
88.
RobinsonJ (2011) The spaces of circulating knowledge: City strategies and global urban governmentality. In: McCannEJWardK (eds) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policy-Making in the Global Age, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 15–40.
89.
RobinsonJ (2013) “Arriving at” the urban/urban policy: Traces of elsewhere in making city futures. In: SöderströmORanderiaSRuedinD (eds) Critical Mobilities, London: Routledge, pp. 1–28.
90.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91.
RoyA (2012) Ethnographic circulations: Space-time relations in the worlds of poverty management. Environment and Planning A44: 31–41.
92.
ShellerMUrryJ (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A38: 207–226.
93.
ShoreCWrightS (1997) Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power, London: Routledge.
94.
ShoreCWrightSPeroD (2011) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
95.
SimsK (2015) The Asian Development Bank and the production of poverty: Neoliberalism, technocratic modernization and land dispossession in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography36: 112–126.
SöderströmOGeertmanS (2013) Loose threads: The translocal making of public space policy in Hanoi. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography34: 244–260.
98.
SwainA (2006) Soft capitalism and a hard industry: Virtualism, the ‘transition industry’ and the restructuring of the Ukrainian coal industry. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31: 208–223.
99.
TemenosCMcCannE (2012) The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment and Planning A44: 1389–1406.
100.
TemenosCMcCannE (2013) Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass7: 344–357.
101.
TheodoreNPeckJ (2012) Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD zone. European Urban and Regional Studies19: 20–41.
102.
VestergaardJ (2009) Discipline in the Global Economy? International Finance and the End of Liberalism, New York and London: Routledge.
103.
WardK (2006) ‘Policies in motion’, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30: 54–75.
104.
WellerSO’NeillP (2014) An argument with neoliberalism: Australia’s place in a global imaginary. Dialogues in Human Geography4: 105–130.
105.
WetzsteinS (2013) Globalising economic governance, political projects, and spatial imaginaries: Insights from four Australasian cities. Geographical Research51: 71–84.
106.
WilliamsME (2006) Escaping the zero-sum scenario: Democracy versus technocracy in Latin America. Political Science Quarterly (Academy of Political Science)121: 119–139.
107.
WilsonG (2006) Beyond the technocrat? The professional expert in development practice. Development and Change37: 501–523.
