Abstract
The underlying argument here is informed by a closer reading of events leading up to Peter's declaration of Jesus as ‘the Son of the Living God’ in Matthew 16, juxtaposed with the notion of ‘Embodied Witness’ in Ivan Satyavarta's paper on ‘Critical Issues’. Jesus did not see the reality of being the Son for demonstrating his divine power but, for servanthood; for achieving the purpose of God through action in the world. Likewise, for the disciples, the declaration of Jesus exceeds mere perception of divinity or his oral confession but for Christ-like action or embodied practice in the world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
