Previous research on men who commit intimate partner violence has addressed two questions: (1) how can researchers and clinicians classify men’s accounts of intimate partner violence?, and (2) do men who engage in intimate partner violence subscribe to particular codes of manhood? The present study linked these two questions by asking how men account for their own intimate partner violence and how their accounts draw upon understandings of manhood. Grounded theory analysis of interviews with 22 incarcerated men identified three categories of themes in participants’ accounts of intimate partner violence: justifications (‘she disrespected me as a man;’ ‘a man has a right to control his woman;’ ‘she provoked me;’ ‘she took it’); dissociations (‘I am not the abusive type;’ ‘my violence was limited, and abusers don’t limit their abuse’); and remorse (‘I regret I abused her’). Divergence among these representations of violent men’s reasons for violence and previous typologies reflects this study’s focus on insiders’ views of behavior. Also, the themes that emerged from participants were informed by conflicting, although not wholly independent, codes of manhood that circulate in U. S. cultural life. Attention to violent men’s sense-making strategies and contradictory narratives of manhood suggests opportunities for intervention and rehabilitation.
Adams, P. , Towns, A. , & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence toward women . Discourse & Society, 6, 387–406 .
2.
Archer, J. (2000a). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680 .
3.
Archer, J. (2000b). Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: A reply to Frieze (2000), O’Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo (2000) . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 697–702 .
4.
Bachman, R. , & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. NCJ-154348. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice .
5.
Bochner, A. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann-Healy, L. (1997). Relationships as stories. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 307–324). Chichester: Wiley .
6.
Bogaert, A. (2001). Personality, individual differences, and preferences for the sexual media . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 29–53 .
7.
Bograd, M. (1988). How battered women and abusive men account for domestic violence: Excuses, justifications, or explanations. In G.Finkelhor , J. Kirkpatrick , & M. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 60–77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
8.
Boyd, N. (2002). Beast within: Why men are violent. Vancouver, BC: Groundwood/Greystone Books .
9.
Bulmer, M. (1979). Concepts in the analysis of qualitative data . Sociological Review, 27, 651–677 .
10.
Campbell, A. (1993). Men, women, and aggression. New York: Basic Books .
11.
Caron, S. , & Carter, D. (1997). The relationships among sex role orientation, egalitarianism, attitudes toward sexuality, and attitudes toward violence against women . Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 568–577 .
12.
Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109–126). Boston: Little, Brown .
13.
Coan, J. , Gottman, J. , Babcock, J. , & Jacobson, N. (1997). Battering and the male rejection of influence from women . Aggressive Behavior, 23, 375–388 .
14.
Comaroff, J. , & Comaroff, J. , (1991). Of revelation and revolution: Christianity, colonialism, and consciousness in South Africa (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
15.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
16.
Daley, C. , & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2000). Relationship between sex-role attitudes and attitudes toward violence among incarcerated male juvenile offenders . Psychological Reports, 87, 552–554 .
17.
Dobash, R. , & Dobash, R. P. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice interventions for domestic violence . Crime and Delinquency, 46, 252–270 .
18.
Dobash, R. , Dobash, R. P. , Cavanagh, K. , & Lewis, R. (1999). Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
19.
Dougherty, D. (2001a). Sexual harassment as (dys)functional process: A feminist standpoint analysis . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 372–402 .
20.
Dougherty, D. (2001b, November). Towards a theoretical understanding of feminist standpoint processes in organizations . Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference. Atlanta, GA.
21.
Dutton, D. (1986). Wife assaulters’ explanation for assault: The neutralization of self-punishment . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 381–390 .
22.
Dutton, D. , & Galant, S. (1997). The batterer: A psychological profile. New York: Harper-Collins .
23.
Dutton, D. (1998). The abusive personality. New York: Guilford Press .
24.
Eisikovits, Z. , & Buchbinder, E. (2000). Talking violent: A phenomenological study of metaphors battering men use . Violence Against Women, 3, 482–498 .
25.
Eisikovits, Z. , & Edleson, J. (1986) Violence in the family: A study of men who batter. New York: Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation .
26.
Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: Morrow .
27.
Felson, R. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
28.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
29.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
30.
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter .
31.
Goldner, V. , Penn, P. , Sheinberg, M. , & Walker, G. (1990). Love and violence: Gender paradoxes in volatile attachments . Family Process, 19, 343–364 .
32.
Goode, E. (2001, August 1). 20% of girls report abuse by a date . Raleigh News and Observer, 10A.
33.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
34.
Hyden, M. , & McCarthy, I. (1994). Woman battering and father–daughter incest disclosure: Discourses of denial and acknowledgement . Discourse & Society, 5, 543–565 .
35.
Jacobson, N. , & Gottman, J. (1998). When men batter women. New York: Simon and Schuster .
36.
Jacobson, N. , & Gurman, A. (Eds.). (1986). Clinical handbook of marital therapy. New York: Guilford Press .
37.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294 .
38.
Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth , A. Crouter , & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
39.
Johnson, M. P. , Conklin, V. , & Menon, N. (2002, November). The effects of different types of domestic violence on women: Intimate terrorism vs. situational couple violence . Paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations annual meeting, Houston, Texas.
40.
Johnson, M. P. , & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963 .
41.
Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood. New York: Free Press .
42.
Kimmel, M. (2002, February 8). Gender, class and terrorism. Chronicle of Higher Education, B11–B12.
43.
Kinney, T. , Smith, B , & Donzella, B. (2001). The influence of sex, gender, self-discrepancies, and self-awareness of anger and verbal aggressiveness among U.S. college students . Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 245–275 .
44.
Lamb, S. (Ed.). (1999). New versions of victims. New York: New York University Press .
45.
Lempert, L. (1996). Women’s strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships . Journal of Family Violence, 11, 269–289 .
46.
Lloyd, S. A. (1999). The interpersonal and communication dynamics of wife battering. In X. B. Arriga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 91–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
47.
Lloyd, S. A. , & Emery, B. (2000). The dark side of courtship: Physical and sexual aggression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
48.
Messner, M. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
49.
Meyers, M. (1997). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
50.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (1999). Available (accessed 10 July 1999): http://www.ncadv.org
51.
O’Leary, K. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer (2000) . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 685–689 .
52.
Owen, W. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication . Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–286 .
53.
Owen, W. (1985). Thematic metaphors in relational communication: A conceptual framework . Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 1–13 .
54.
Petrick, N. , Olson, R. , & Subotnik, L. (1994). Powerlessness and the need to control: The male abuser’s dilemma . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 278–285 .
55.
Proceedings of the National Institute of Justice Gender Symmetry Workshop. (2000, November 20). Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/vawaprog/
56.
Scott, M. , & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts . American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62 .
57.
Scully, D. , & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motives: Excuses and justifications . Social Problems, 31, 530–544 .
58.
Shank-Krusciewitz, E. , & Wood, J. T. (2001). ‘He was our child from the moment we walked in that room:’ Entrance stories of adoptive parents . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 785–803 .
59.
Straus, M. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oscamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
60.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
61.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
62.
Tjaden, P. , & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Injury Prevention and Control .
63.
Vangelisti, A. , Crumley, L. , & Baker, J. (1999). Family portraits: Stories as standards for family relationships . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 335–368 .
64.
Wood, J. T. (2000). ‘That wasn’t the real him:’ Women’s dissociation of violence from the men who enact it . Qualitative Research in Review, 1, 1–7 .
65.
Wood, J. T. (2001). The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationships: Women’s narratives of love and violence . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 239–261 .
