The purpose of this research was to examine the role of self-construal on goal instrumentality in close friendships. Participants (105 female friend dyads, N = 210) were asked to set personal academic goals and were followed up over the course of a semester. Using the actor–partner interdependence model, results revealed that those with a high relational self-construal were more likely to perceive their friends to be instrumental to their goals. This in turn led to greater friendship commitment and closeness as well as greater goal progress over the course of the semester. Actor’s perception of goal instrumentality did not lead to friend’s goal progress but did have positive relational consequences. The results highlight the benefits of relying on others in self-regulation.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
4.
AronA.Mclaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 101–132.
5.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404.
6.
CobbR. J.DavilaJ.BradburyT. N. (2001). Attachment security and marital satisfaction: The role of positive perceptions and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1131–1143.
7.
CrossS. E. (2009). Relational self-construal: Past and future. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 949–961.
8.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.
9.
CrossS. E.HardinE. E.Gercek-SwingB. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179.
10.
FehrB. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.
11.
FitzsimonsG. M.BarghJ. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 148–164.
12.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2011). Outsourcing self-regulation. Psychological Science, 22369–375.
13.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2012). Outsourcing effort to close others. In CampbellL.LaGuardiaJ. G.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The science of the couple: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 12, pp. 41–57). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 535–549.
15.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 319–337.
16.
GereJ.SchimmackU. (2013). When romantic partners’ goals conflict: effects on relationship quality and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 37–49.
17.
GereJ.SchimmackU.PinkusR. T.LockwoodP. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 549–559.
18.
GollwitzerP. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
19.
GoreJ. S. (2014). The influence of close others in daily goal pursuit. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 71–92.
20.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E. (2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 848–861.
21.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E.KanagawaC. (2009). Acting in our interests: Relational self construal and goal motivation across cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 75–87.
22.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E.MorrisM. L. (2006). Let's be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83–102.
23.
HoyleR. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. New York, NY: Sage.
24.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
26.
KoestnerR.LekesN.PowersT. A.ChicoineE. (2002). Attaining personal goals: self concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 231–244.
27.
LoerschC.AartsH.Keith PayneB.JefferisV. E. (2008). The influence of social groups on goal contagion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1555–1558.
28.
MachoS.LedermannT. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16, 34–43.
29.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98, 224–253.
30.
OlsenJ. A.KennyD. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127–141.
31.
SternbergR. J. (1998). Cupid's arrow: The course of love through time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.
33.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L.CwirD.SpencerS. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 513–532.
