This study distinguishes perceptions of, preferences for, and outcomes related to people’s social ties online. It expands understanding of when and why using social network sites (SNSs) provides people with several types of supportive communication by integrating users’ social capital and preference for weak tie support. Prior research is synthesized and extended to build a heuristic model of social ties and supportive communication in SNSs that considers network-based variables (i.e., social capital, preference for weak ties) as mechanisms that link the use of SNSs to the supportive messages people receive. A community sample (N = 553) completed an online questionnaire. Results indicated that intensity of Facebook use corresponds with both social capital and received support. Moreover, social capital mediates and preference for weak ties moderates the relationship between using Facebook and receiving support, and results differ according to the types of social capital and support under consideration. Facebook use, for example, only corresponds with receiving informational and esteem support when users exhibit sufficient preferences for weak tie support.
AdelmanM. B.ParksM. R.AlbrechtT. L. (1987). Supporting friends in need. In AlbrechtT. L.AdelmanM. B. (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 105–125). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40. doi:10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314
3.
AppelL.DadlaniP.DwyerM.HamptonK.KitzieV.MatniZ. A.,…TeodoroR. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 398–416. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.884612
4.
BakshyE.RosennI.MarlowC.AdamicL. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519–528). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2187836.2187907
5.
BeaudoinC. E. (2007). News, social capital and health in the context of Katrina. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18, 418–430. doi:10.1353/hpu.2007.0024
6.
BeaudoinC. E.TaoC. C. (2007). Benefiting from social capital in online support groups: An empirical study of cancer patients. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 587–590. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9986
7.
BeaudoinC. E.TaoC. C. (2008). Modeling the impact of online cancer resources on supporters of cancer patients. New Media & Society, 10, 321–344.
8.
BocellF. (2015). The impact of unmodeled error covariance on measurement models in structural equation modeling. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
10.
BurkeM.KrautR. (2013). Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13) (pp. 1419–1430). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441913
11.
BurkeM.KrautR.MarlowC. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979023
12.
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010) (pp. 1909–1912). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753613
13.
BurlesonB. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23. doi:10.1111/1475-6811
14.
BurlesonB. R. (2009). Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 21–38. doi:10.1177/0265407509105519
15.
BurlesonB. R.MacGeorgeE. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
BurtR. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital (pp. 31–56). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
BurtR. S. (2010). Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
CheungC. M.ChiuP. Y.LeeM. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook?Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1337–1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07
19.
CohenJ. L.LakeyB.TiellK.NeelyL. C. (2005). Recipient-provider agreement on enacted support, perceived support, and provider personality. Psychological Assessment, 17, 375–378. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.375
20.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
21.
CutronaC. E.SuhrJ. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174. doi:10.1177/00936509201900 2002
22.
de Jong GierveldJ. (1998). A review of loneliness: Concept and definitions, determinants and consequences. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 8, 73–80.
23.
EllisonN. B.GrayR.LampeC.FioreA. T. (2014a). Social capital and resource requests on Facebook. New Media & Society, 16, 1104–1121. doi:10.1177/1461444814543998
24.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
25.
EllisonN. B.VitakJ. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In SundarS. S. (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Chichester, England: Wiley.
26.
EllisonN. B.VitakJ.GrayR.LampeC. (2014b). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
27.
FoxJ.WarberK. M.MakstallerD. C. (2013). The role of Facebook in romantic relationship development: An exploration of Knapp’s relational stage model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 771–794. doi:10.1177/0265407512468370
28.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572–580. doi: 10.1086/208993
29.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
30.
GrayR.EllisonN. B.VitakJ.LampeC. (2013). Who wants to know? Question-asking and answering practices among Facebook users. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1213–1224). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441913
31.
HamptonK. N.GouletL. S.MarlowC.RainieL. (2012). Why most Facebook users get more than they give. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
32.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
33.
HighA. C.Oeldorf-HirschA.BellurS. (2014). Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.037
34.
HolmstromA. J.BurlesonB. R. (2011). An initial test of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355. doi:10.1177/0093650
35.
HolmstromA. J.RussellJ. C.ClareD. D. (2013). Esteem support messages received during the job search: A test of the CETESM. Communication Monographs, 80, 220–242.
36.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
37.
JungY.GrayR.LampeC.EllisonN. (2013). Favors from Facebook friends: Unpacking dimensions of social capital. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 11–20). Paris, France: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470657
38.
KimY.SohnD.ChoiS. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 365–372. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.015
39.
KrämerN. C.RösnerL.EimlerS. C.WinterS.NeubaumG. (2014). Let the weakest link go! Empirical explorations on the relative importance of weak and strong ties on social networking sites. Societies, 4, 785–809. doi:10.3390/soc4040785
40.
LampeC.GrayR.FioreA. T.EllisonN. (2014). Help is on the way: Patterns of responses to resource requests on Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 3–15). Baltimore, MD: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531720
41.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28–51.
42.
LinN. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
43.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
MengJ.MartinezL.HolmstromA.ChungM.CoxJ. (2016). Research on social networking sites and social support from 2004 to 2015: A narrative review and directions for future research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0325
45.
NewmanM. W.LauterbachD.MunsonS. A.ResnickP.MorrisM. E. (2011). It’s not that I don’t have problems, I’m just not putting them on Facebook: Challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 341–350). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1958824.1958876
46.
OhH. J.LaucknerC.BoehmerJ.Fewins-BlissR.LiK. (2013). Facebooking for health: An examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2072–2080. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013
47.
PapacharissiZ. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11, 199–220. doi:10.1177/1461444808099577
48.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
49.
RainsS. A.PetersonE. B.WrightK. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82, 403–430. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530
50.
RozzellB.PiercyC. W.CarrC. T.KingS.LaneB. L.TornesM.…WrightK. B. (2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272–280. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014
51.
SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PeirceG. R. (1990). Traditional views of social support and their impact on assessment. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Wiley.
StefanoneM. A.KwonK. H.LackaffD. (2012). Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 451–466. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01585.x
54.
ThurberR. S.ShinnM. R.SmolkowskiK. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 498–513.
55.
UchinoB. N.CarlisleM.BirminghamW.VaughnA. A. (2011). Social support and the reactivity hypothesis: Conceptual issues in examining the efficacy of received support during acute psychological stress. Biological Psychology, 86, 137–142.
56.
VitakJ. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56, 451–470. doi:10.1080/08838151.20
57.
VitakJ.EllisonN. B. (2013). ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 15, 243–259. doi:10.1177/1461444812451566
58.
WellmanB.HaaseA. Q.WitteJ.HamptonK. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455.
59.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.
60.
WilliamsD. (2006). On and off the ‘net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593–628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029
61.
WrightK. B.BellS. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39–54.
62.
WrightK. B.MillerC. H. (2010). A measure of weak-tie/strong-tie support network preference. Communication Monographs, 77, 500–517. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.502
63.
WrightK. B.RainsS. A. (2013). Weak-tie support network preference, health-related stigma, and health outcomes in computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 309–324. doi:10.1080/00909882.2013.792435
64.
WrightK. B.RainsS.BanasJ. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606–624. doi:10.1111/j.1083
65.
XuY.BurlesonB. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792
66.
ZhaoX.LampeC.EllisonN. B. (2016). The social media ecology: User perceptions, strategies and challenges. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘16) (pp. 89–100). San Jose, CA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858333
