This investigation examined the extent to which receiving touch during discussions of stressors predicts subsequent personal and relational well-being. Married couples were unobtrusively videotaped as couple-members took turns discussing their personal stressors with one another. We assessed the degree to which couple-members received touch from their spouses during the discussions and investigated whether touch receipt predicted beneficial personal and relational outcomes after the discussions. Results indicated that disclosers who received greater (higher frequency and higher intensity) touch while they discussed their stressors perceived that they were more able to overcome their stressors, experienced greater decreases in self-reported stress, reported greater increases in self-esteem, and viewed their partners more positively than disclosers who received less touch. Additionally, helpers (spouses in the listening role) who received greater touch during their partner’s stressor discussion also viewed their partners more positively than helpers who received less touch. Implications and potential future directions are discussed.
BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook, 18, 381–413.
2.
BeckesL.CoanJ. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 976–988.
3.
BelcherA. J.LaurenceauJ. P.GraberE. C.CohenL. H.DascheK. B.SiegelS. D. (2011). Daily support in couples coping with early stage breast cancer: Maintaining intimacy during adversity. Health Psychology, 30, 665–673.
4.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475.
5.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
6.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
7.
BrantleyP. J.WaggonerC. D.JonesG. N.RappaportN. B. (1987). A daily stress inventory: Development, reliability, and validity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 61–74.
8.
BurgoonJ. K. (1991). Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233–259.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.BullerD. B.HaleJ. L.deTurckM. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10, 351–378.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.WaltherJ. B.BaeslerE. J. (1992). Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19, 237–263.
11.
CoanJ. A.SchaeferH. S.DavidsonR. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation and the neural threat response to threat. Psychological Science, 17, 1032–1039.
12.
CohenS. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684.
13.
CohenS.GianarosP. J.ManuckS. P. (2016). A stage model of stress and disease. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 456–463.
14.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD.MillerG. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 14, 1685–1687.
15.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.
16.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.
17.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004a). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy. In MashekD. J.AronA. A. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 163–188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004b). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363–383.
19.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.
20.
CrockettE. E.NeffL. A. (2012). When receiving help hurts: Gender differences in diurnal cortisol responses to spousal support. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 190–197.
21.
DakofG. A.TaylorS. E. (1990). Victims’ perceptions of social support: What is helpful from whom?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 80–89.
22.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373–1385.
23.
DitzenB.NeumannI. D.BodenmannG.von DawansB.TurnerR. A.EhlertU.HeinrichsM. (2007). Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 565–574.
24.
DunbarR. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioral function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260–268.
25.
FeeneyB. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648.
26.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147.
27.
FieldT. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30, 367–383.
28.
FivecoatH. C.TomlinsonJ. M.AronA.CaprarielloP. A. (2014). Partner support for individual self-expansion opportunities: Effects on relationship satisfaction in long-term couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 368–385.
29.
FloydK. (2002). Human affection exchange: V. Attributes of the highly affectionate. Communication Quarterly, 50, 135–152.
30.
FloydK. (2006). Communication affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FloydK.BorenJ. P.HannawaA. F.HesseC.McEwanB.VekslerA. E. (2009). Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 113–133.
32.
FloydK.MormonM. (1998). The measurement of affectionate communication. Communication Quarterly, 46, 144–162.
33.
FloydK.RiforgiateS. (2008). Affectionate communication received from spouses predicts stress hormone levels in healthy adults. Communication Monographs, 75, 351–368.
34.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246–259.
35.
GerinW.PieperC.LevyR.PickeringT. G. (1992). Social support in social interaction: A moderator of cardiovascular reactivity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54, 324–336.
36.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1441–1454.
37.
GruenwaldT. L.KemenyM. E.AzizN.FaheyJ. L. (2004). Acute threat to the social self: Shame, self-esteem, and cortisol activity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 915–924.
38.
GulledgeA. K.GulledgeM. H.StahmannR. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242.
39.
HammenC. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319.
40.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
41.
HertensteinM. J.HolmesR.McCulloughM.KeltnerD. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9, 566–573.
42.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
HowlandM.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Getting in under the radar: A dyadic view of invisible support. Psychological Science, 21, 1878–1885.
44.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB.C. (2016a). A sense of security: Touch promotes state attachment security. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 745–753.
45.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2016b). Keep in touch: The effects of imagined touch support on exploration and pain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 59–67.
46.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2017). Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: A theoretical model and review of the research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 228–252.
47.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2018). Hand-in-hand combat: Affectionate touch promotes relational well-being and buffers stress during conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218788556
48.
JohnsonM. D.CohanC. L.DavilaJ.LawrenceE.RoggeR. D.KarneyB. R.…BradburyT. N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 15–27.
49.
JohnsonS. M.MoserM. B.BeckesL.SmithA.DalgleishT.HalchukR.…CoanJ. A. (2013). Soothing the threatened brain: Leveraging contact comfort with emotionally focused therapy. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–10.
50.
JonesS. E.YarbroughA. (1985). A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication Monographs, 52, 19–56.
51.
KaneH. S.McCallC.CollinsN. L.BlascovichJ. (2012). Mere presence is not enough: Responsive support in a virtual world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 37–44.
52.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
53.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
KimK.FeeneyB. C.JakubiakB. K. (2018). Touch reduces romantic jealousy in the anxiously attached. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1019–1041.
55.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
56.
LearyM. R.HauptA. L.StrausserK. S.ChokelJ. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290–1299.
57.
MackeyR. A.DiemerM. A.O’BrienB. A. (2000). Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles, 43, 201–227.
58.
MannM.HosmanC. M. H.SchaalmaH. P.de VriesN. K. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19, 357–372.
59.
McFarlandC.RossM. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 937–946.
60.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.
61.
MikulincerM.GillathO.ShaverP. R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881–895.
62.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 139–156.
63.
MuiseA.GiangE.ImpettE. A. (2014). Post sex affectionate exchanges promote sexual and relational satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1391–1402.
64.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN.L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
65.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 435–450.
66.
NesL. S.SegerstromS. C. (2006). Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 235–251.
67.
PauleyP. M.FloydK.HesseC. (2014). The stress-buffering effects of a brief dyadic interaction before an acute stressor. Health Communication, 30, 645–659.
68.
RobinsonK. J.HoplockL. B.CameronJ. J. (2015). When in doubt, reach out: Touch is a covert but effective mode of soliciting and providing social support. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 831–839.
69.
SaransonI. G.JohnsonJ. H.SiegelJ. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946.
70.
SchnallS.HarberK. D.StefanucciJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246–1255.
71.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446.
72.
VanLaninghamJ.JohnsonD. R.AmatoP. (2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 79, 1313–1341.
73.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
