The present laboratory-based study investigated socioeconomic status (SES) as a moderator of the association between empathic accuracy and well-being among married couples from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Empathic accuracy was measured using a performance-based measure of empathic accuracy for one’s spouse’s negative emotions during a marital conflict conversation. Aspects of well-being included well-being (i.e., positive affect, life satisfaction), ill-being (i.e., negative affect, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms), and marital satisfaction. SES was measured using a composite score of income and education. Findings showed that SES moderated associations between empathic accuracy and well-being. Empathic accuracy was beneficial (for well-being and ill-being) or not harmful (for marital satisfaction) at low levels of SES. In contrast, empathic accuracy was not beneficial (for well-being and ill-being) or harmful (for marital satisfaction) at high levels of SES. Results were robust (controlled for age, gender, and race). Findings are discussed in light of interdependence vs. independence in low- vs. high-SES contexts and highlight the importance of socioeconomic context in determining whether empathic accuracy benefits well-being or not.
AdlerN. E.NewmanK. (2002). Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60
2.
AldaoA. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: Capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An Inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
5.
BloomP. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. Random House.
6.
CarrD.FreedmanV. A.CornmanJ. C.SchwarzN. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76(5), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12133
7.
ChenE.LeeW. K.CaveyL.HoA. (2013). Role models and the psychological characteristics that buffer low-socioeconomic-status youth from cardiovascular risk. Child Development, 84(4), 1241–1252.
8.
ChenE.MatthewsK. A. (2001). Cognitive appraisal biases: An approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_4
9.
ChenE.McLeanK. C.MillerG. E. (2015). Shift-and-persist strategies: Associations with socioeconomic status and the regulation of inflammation among adolescents and their parents. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000157
10.
ChenE.MillerG. E. (2012). “Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why low socioeconomic status isn’t always bad for health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612436694
11.
ChungW.ChanS.CasselsT. G. (2010). The role of culture in affective empathy: Cultural and bicultural differences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3–4), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710X531203
12.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
13.
CohenSSchulzM. S.LiuS. R.HalassaM.WaldingerR. J. (2015). Empathic accuracy and aggression in couples: Individual and dyadic links. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 697–711.
14.
CohenS.SchulzM. S.WeissE.WaldingerR. J. (2012). Eye of the beholder: The individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(2), 236.
15.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.MartinM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704.
16.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.ChengB. H.OveisC.Van der LöweI.LianH.KeltnerD. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217.
17.
CrenshawA. O.LeoK.BaucomB. R. (2019). The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(3), 327.
18.
DestinM.Rheinschmidt-SameM.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Status-based identity: A conceptual approach integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616664424
19.
DiemerM. A.MistryR. S.WadsworthM. E.LópezI.ReimersF. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 77–113.
20.
DienerE. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34.
21.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
22.
DuncanG. J.RodgersW. L. (1988). Longitudinal aspects of childhood poverty. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(4), 1007–1021.
23.
ElovainioM.Pulkki-RåbackL.JokelaM.KivimäkiM.HintsanenM.HintsaT.ViikariJ.RaitakariO. T.Keltikangas-JärvinenL. (2012). Socioeconomic status and the development of depressive symptoms from childhood to adulthood: A longitudinal analysis across 27 years of follow-up in the Young Finns study. Social Science & Medicine, 74(6), 923–929.
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
25.
Fernandez-BerrocalP.AlcaideR.ExtremeraN.PizarroD. (2006). The role of emotional intelligence in anxiety and depression among adolescents. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 16–27.
26.
FletcherG. J.KerrP. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627.
27.
FurnhamA.PetridesK. V. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence and happiness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(8), 815–823. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.8.815
28.
GadassiR.MorN.RafaeliE. (2011). Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: An interpersonal model of gender differences in depression. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611414728
29.
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 322–338.
30.
GalloL. C.BogartL. M.VranceanuA.-M.MatthewsK. A. (2005). Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the reserve capacity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 386.
31.
GalobardesB.ShawM.LawlorD. A.LynchJ. W. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
32.
GannonN.RanzijnR. (2005). Does emotional intelligence predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond IQ and personality?Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.001
33.
GleichgerrchtE.DecetyJ. (2011). The costs of empathy among health professionals. In DecetyJ. (Ed.), Empathy: From bench to bedside. MIT Press.
34.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221.
35.
HallJ. A.MastM. S.LatuI.-M. (2015). The vertical dimension of social relations and accurate interpersonal perception: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39(2), 131–163.
36.
HinnekensC.LoeysT.De SchryverM.VerhofstadtL. L. (2018). The manageability of empathic (in)accuracy during couples’ conflict: Relationship-protection or self-protection?Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9689-z
37.
HinnekensC.VanheeG.De SchryverM.IckesW.VerhofstadtL. L. (2016). Empathic accuracy and observed demand behavior in couples. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01370
38.
HittnerE. F.RimK. L.HaaseC. M. (2019). Socioeconomic status as a moderator of the link between reappraisal and anxiety: Laboratory-based and longitudinal evidence. Emotion, 19(8), 1478.
39.
IckesW. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Prometheus Books.
40.
IckesW.GesnP. R.GrahamT. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships, 7(1), 95–109.
41.
IckesW.HodgesS. D. (2013). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 116–136). Oxford University Press.
42.
IckesW.StinsonL.BissonnetteV.GarciaS. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730.
43.
IckesW. J. (1997). Empathic accuracy. Guilford Press.
44.
JohnsonP. O.NeymanJ. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
45.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implications for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 171–174.
46.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635
47.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 417.
48.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439.
49.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). The analysis of dyadic data. Guilford.
50.
Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K.NewtonT. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472.
51.
KilduffM.ChiaburuD. S.MengesJ. I. (2010). Strategic use of emotional intelligence in organizational settings: Exploring the dark side. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.10.002
52.
KilpatrickS. D.BissonnetteV. L.RusbultC. E. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behavior among newly married couples. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 369–393.
53.
KrausM. W. (2017). Voice-only communication enhances empathic accuracy. American Psychologist, 72(7), 644.
54.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546.
57.
KriegerN.WilliamsD. R.MossN. E. (1997). Measuring social class in US public health Research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18(1), 341–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341
58.
KrznaricR. (2015). Empathy: Why it matters, and how to get it. TarcherPerigee.
59.
LevensonR. W.HaaseC. M.BlochL.SeiderB. J. (2013). Emotion regulation in couples. In GrossJ. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 267–283). Guildford Press.
60.
LevensonR. W.RuefA. M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 234.
61.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21, 251–255.
62.
LorenzF. O.WickramaK. A. S.CongerR. D.ElderG. H.Jr (2006). The short-term and decade-long effects of divorce on women’s midlife health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(2), 111–125.
63.
LosoyaS. H.EisenbergN. (2001). Affective empathy. In HallJ. A.BernieriF. J. (Eds.), The LEA series in personality and clinical psychology. Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 21–43). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
64.
Ma-KellamsC.BlascovichJ. (2013). The ironic effect of financial incentive on empathic accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.014
65.
MaussI. B.CookC. L.ChengJ. Y.GrossJ. J. (2007). Individual differences in cognitive reappraisal: Experiential and physiological responses to an anger provocation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66(2), 116–124.
66.
McCabeC.KimD.KingK. (2018). Improving present practices in the visual display of interactions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917746792
67.
McRaeK. (2016). Cognitive emotion regulation: A review of theory and scientific findings. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.004
68.
McRaeK.JacobsS. E.RayR. D.JohnO. P.GrossJ. J. (2012). Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.003
69.
MorrisS. E.CuthbertB. N. (2012). Research domain criteria: Cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 29.
70.
NeyerF. J.BanseR.AsendorpfJ. B. (1999). The role of projection and empathic accuracy in dyadic perception between older twins. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 419–442.
71.
OakesJ. M.RossiP. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science & Medicine, 56(4), 769–784.
72.
PappL. M.KourosC. D.CummingsE. M. (2010). Emotions in marital conflict interactions: Empathic accuracy, assumed similarity, and the moderating context of depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348810
73.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
74.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
75.
ProulxC. M.HelmsH. M.BuehlerC. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593.
76.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
77.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.
78.
RossJ. M.KarneyB. R.NguyenT. P.BradburyT. N. (2019). Communication that is maladaptive for middle-class couples is adaptive for socioeconomically disadvantaged couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000158
79.
RyffC. D.LoveG. D.UrryH. L.MullerD.RosenkranzM. A.FriedmanE. M.DavidsonR. J.SingerB. (2006). Psychological well-being and ill-being: Do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates?Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75(2), 85–95.
80.
SchlegelK. (2020). Inter- and intrapersonal downsides of accurately perceiving others’ emotions. In SternbergR.KostićA. (Eds.), Social intelligence and nonverbal communication (pp. 359–395). Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
SchreiterS.PijnenborgG. H. M.Aan Het RotM. (2013). Empathy in adults with clinical or subclinical depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.009
82.
SenedH.LavidorM.LazarusG.Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE.IckesW. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320
83.
ShaversV. L. (2007). Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(9), 1013–1023.
84.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.BlackstoneT. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 629.
85.
SimpsonJ. A.OrinaM. M.IckesW. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 881. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.629
86.
SotoJ. A.LevensonR. W. (2009). Emotion recognition across cultures: The influence of ethnicity on empathic accuracy and physiological linkage. Emotion, 9(6), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017399
87.
StellarJ. E.ManzoV. M.KrausM. W.KeltnerD. (2012). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12(3), 449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026508
88.
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143
89.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsL. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143
90.
StinsonL.IckesW. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 787.
91.
SunR.VuillierL.HuiB. P. H.KoganA. (2019). Caring helps: Trait empathy is related to better coping strategies and differs in the poor versus the rich. PLOS One, 14(3), e0213142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213142
92.
TanJ. J. X.KrausM. W.ImpettE. A.KeltnerD. (2019). Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social class differences in subjective well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550619837006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619837006
93.
TroyA. S.FordB. Q.McRaeK.ZaroliaP.MaussI. B. (2017). Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status. Emotion, 17(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000210
94.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.BrunnerA.FriedmanR.JonesM. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion, 18(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000371
95.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.MaussI. B. (2013). A person-by-situation approach to emotion regulation cognitive reappraisal can either help or hurt, depending on the context. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2505–2514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496434
VerhofstadtL. L.BuysseA.IckesW.DavisM.DevoldreI. (2008). Support provision in marriage: The role of emotional similarity and empathic accuracy. Emotion, 8(6), 792. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013976
98.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
99.
WellsJ. L.BrownC. L.HuaA. Y.SoysterP. D.ChenK.-H.DokuruD. R.CoppolaG.HaaseC. M.LevensonR. W. (2019). Neurodegenerative disease caregivers’5-HTTLPR genotype moderates the effect of patients’ empathic accuracy deficits on caregivers’ well-being. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(10), 1046–1056.
100.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357.
WroschC.HeckhausenJ.LachmanM. E. (2000). Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.15.3.387
ZhangY.HedoR.RiveraA.RullR.RichardsonS.TuX. M. (2019). Post hoc power analysis: Is it an informative and meaningful analysis?General Psychiatry, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100069
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
