Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Demand for second-language (L2) Chinese education for kindergarteners has grown rapidly, but little is known about these kindergarteners’ L2 skills, with existing studies focusing on school-age populations and alphabetic languages. Accordingly, we developed a six-subtest Chinese character acquisition assessment to measure L2 kindergarteners’ abilities to make associations among the forms, sounds, and meanings of 40 Chinese characters, and administered it to 173 five- and six-year-old L2 kindergarteners in Hong Kong. We found a high model-to-data fit using the two-parameter logistic item response theory model (MS_infit = .87 to 1.07, ps > .41). Of the 40 items, 36 exhibited a range of difficulty and good discrimination. Internal consistency reliability and inter-rater reliability were also high. The children scored highest in the category of meaning-sound associations, followed by mapping from meaning to form. The results demonstrate that the instrument is adequately valid and reliable for assessing L2 kindergarteners’ character acquisition and imply that child L2 learners may develop abilities to map meanings and sounds prior to their development of form-related mapping. With minor modifications, the developed instrument can be used in various child Chinese L2 programs around the world.

Keywords

Chinese as a second language Chinese character acquisition kindergarten language assessment second language/L2

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

(1949). Yuedu xinli; Hanzi wenti [The psychology of reading; issues related to Chinese characters]. Taipei: Guoli bianyi guan.

Baker

F. B.

(2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458219

Brownell

(Ed.). (2000). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test: Manual. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications.

Cheung

P. S. P.

Lee

K. Y. S.

Lee

L. W. T.

(1997). The development of the “Cantonese receptive vocabulary test” for children aged 2–6 in Hong Kong. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 32, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829709021465

Cunningham

A. E.

Stanovich

K. E.

(1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.934

DeFrancis

(1984). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

DeMars

(2010). Item response theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Dunn

L. M.

Dunn

D. M.

(2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, Fourth edition (PPVT™-4): Manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.

García

G. E.

McKoon

August

(2006). Language and literacy assessment of language-minority students. In August

Shanahan

(Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 597–624). New York: Routledge.

10.

Hau

K.-T.

(2010). Provision of consultancy service for a study on good practices in primary and secondary schools to support non-Chinese speaking students. Hong Kong: Education Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

11.

C. S.-H.

Bryant

(1997). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.946

12.

C. S.-H.

Chan

D. W. O.

Tsang

S. M.

Lee

S. H.

(2000). The Hong Kong test of specific learning difficulties in reading and writing. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Specific Learning Difficulties Research Team.

13.

Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2017). 2016 Population by-census: Summary results. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. https://www.bycensus2016.gov.hk/data/16bc-summary-results.pdf

14.

Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2008). Zhongying duizhao xianggang xuexiao zhongwen xuexi jichu zici [Lexical items with English explanations for fundamental Chinese learning in Hong Kong schools]. Hong Kong: Chinese Language Education Section, Curriculum Development Institute, Education Bureau, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

15.

Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2014). Legislative council panel on education: Implementation of the “Chinese language curriculum second language learning framework” and professional support, LC Paper No. CB(4)913/13-14(05). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Legislative Council.

16.

Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2017). Code on access to information (No. 025/17). Hong Kong: Education Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

17.

Hong Kong Legislative Council. (2017). Replies to initial written questions raised by finance committee members in examining the estimates of expenditure 2017-18 EDB011 (Question Serial No. 0119). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/about-edb/press/legco/others/17-18-EDB-2-e1.pdf

18.

Hong Kong Unison. (2012). Report: Survey on kindergarten education for ethnic minority students in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Unison. https://www.unison.org.hk/DocumentDownload/Researches/R201204%20Kindergarten%20Survey%20Report.pdf

19.

Hoosain

(1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

20.

Jackson

N. E.

(1995). Graphic and phonological processing in Chinese character identification. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969509547885

21.

Kane

M. T.

(2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000

22.

Kaplan

R. M.

Saccuzzo

D. P.

(2013). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

23.

W. W.

Marton

Pang

M. F.

(2010). Learning tones. In Marton

Tse

S. K.

Cheung

W. M.

(Eds.), On the learning of Chinese (pp. 31–51). Rotterdam: Sense.

24.

H. B.

Chan

K. W.

Sandhu

K. K.

(2005). A research report on the education of South Asian ethnic minority groups in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Centre for Social Policy Studies, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

25.

Leong

C. K.

(1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Taylor

Olson

D. R.

(Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries, and characters (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

26.

Lesaux

Koda

Siegel

Shanahan

(2006). Development of literacy. In August

Shanahan

(Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 75-122). New York: Routledge.

27.

(2015). Teaching Chinese literacy in the early years: Psychology, pedagogy and practice. Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814285

28.

Lin

C.-H.

Collins

(2011). The effects of L1 and orthographic regularity and consistency in naming Chinese characters. Reading and Writing, 25, 1747–1767.

29.

Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. (2016). LSHK Jyutping Word List, Version 1. http://corpus.eduhk.hk/JPwordlist/index.php

30.

L.-y.

Yeung

P.-s.

C. S.-H.

Chan

D. W.-o.

Chung

(2016). The role of stroke knowledge in reading and spelling in Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12058

31.

Lord

F. M.

(1975). Formula scoring and number-right scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1975.tb01003.x

32.

McBride

(2016). Children’s literacy development: A cross-cultural perspective on learning to read and write (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

33.

McBride-Chang

C. S. H.

(2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.50

34.

McBride-Chang

Shu

Zhou

Wat

C. P.

Wagner

R. K.

(2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743

35.

Messick

(1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018002005

36.

Packard

J. L.

(2002). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Perfetti

Cao

Booth

(2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese reading informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689786

38.

Perfetti

Tan

L. H.

(1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In Wang

Inhoff

A. W.

Chen

H.-C.

(Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-02259-006

39.

Rathvon

(2004). Early reading assessment: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford Press.

40.

Shen

H. H.

(2010). Analysis of radical knowledge development among beginning CFL learners. In Everson

M. E.

Shen

H. H.

(Eds.), Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language (Chinese Language Teachers Association Monograph Series, Vol. 4) (pp. 45–65). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.

41.

Shen

H. H.

(2013). Chinese L2 literacy development: Cognitive characteristics, learning strategies, and pedagogical interventions. Language and Linguistic Compass, 7, 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12034

42.

Shu

Anderson

R. C.

(1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.1.5

43.

Siegel

L. S.

(1997). Learning to read Chinese: Semantic, syntactic, phonological and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007963513853

44.

Taylor

Olson

D. R.

(1995). An introduction to reading the world’s scripts. In Taylor

Olson

D. R.

(Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries, and characters (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

45.

Tong

Ting

K. T.

McBride-Chang

(2011). Shyness and Chinese and English vocabulary skills in Hong Kong kindergartners. Early Education and Development, 22, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280903507253

46.

Tse

S. K.

(2002). Zong he gao xiao shi zi jiao xue fa [Integrative perceptual approach for character teaching]. Hong Kong: Greenfield Educational Center.

47.

Tse

S. K.

Zhu

X. H.

(2001). Shizi jiaoyuxue de xinli [Psychology of the teaching and learning of Chinese characters]. In Tse

S. K.

(Ed.), Gao xiao han zi jiao yu xue [Highly efficient teaching and learning of characters] (pp. 44-96). Hong Kong: Greenfield Educational Center.

48.

Tsung

Zhang

Cruickshank

(2010). Access to majority language and educational outcomes: South Asian background students in postcolonial Hong Kong. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 4, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1559569090344225

49.

Winke

Lee

Ahn

J. I.

Choi

Cui

Yoon

H.-J.

(2018). The cognitive validity of child English language tests: What young language learners and their native-speaking peers can reveal. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.396

Development and validation of a Chinese character acquisition assessment for second-language kindergarteners

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References