In this paper we report on a project in which we developed tools to support the classroom assessment of learners’ interactional competence (IC) and provided learning oriented feedback in the context of preparation for a high-stakes face-to-face speaking test. Six trained examiners provided stimulated verbal reports (n = 72) on 12 paired interactions, focusing on interactional features of candidates’ performance. We thematically analysed the verbal reports to inform a draft checklist and materials, which were then trialled by four experienced teachers. Informed by both data sources, the final product comprised the following: (a) a detailed IC checklist with nine main categories and over 50 sub-categories, an accompanying detailed description of each area and feedback to learners, which teachers can adapt to suit their teaching and testing contexts; and (b) a concise IC checklist with four categories and bite-sized feedback for real-time classroom assessment.
Interactional competence, a key aspect of face-to-face communication, is under-researched and under-explored in second/foreign language teaching, learning, and assessment contexts. This in-depth treatment of it, therefore, stands to contribute to learning contexts through raising teachers’ and learners’ awareness of micro-level features of the construct, and to assessment contexts through developing a more comprehensive understanding of the construct.
DeKeyserR. M. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DunlopM. (2017). Maximizing feedback for language learning: English language learners’ attention, affect, cognition and usage of computer-delivered feedback from an English language reading proficiency assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
9.
EricssonK. A. (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
GalacziE. D. (2008). Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300801934702
11.
GalacziE. D. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017
12.
GalacziE.TaylorL. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
13.
GassS.MackeyA. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
GreenA. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research. Studies in Language Testing volume 5. Cambridge, UK: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
15.
GreenA. B. (2016). Assessment literacy for language teachers. In TsagariD. (Ed.), Classroom-based assessment in L2 contexts (pp. 8–29). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
16.
HallJ. K.Pekarek DoehlerS. (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. In HallJ. K.HellermannJ.Pekarek DoehlerS. (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 1–15). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
IkedaN. (2017). Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatics performance in university settings. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.
19.
IshidaM. (2011). Engaging in another person’s telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: development of interactional competence during one-year study abroad. In PallottiG.WangerJ. (Eds.), L2 Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 45–85). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
20.
JonesN.SavilleN. (2016). Learning oriented assessment: A systemic approach. Studies in Language Testing volume 45. Cambridge, UK: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
21.
KramschC. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/326815
22.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
23.
LamD. M. K. (2018). What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126
LeaperD. (2014). Consistency in performance in the group oral discussion test: An interactional competence perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Australia.
26.
MayL. (2011). Interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater’s perspective. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
27.
NakatsuharaF. (2013). The co-construction of conversation in group oral tests. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
Pekarek DoehlerS.BergerE. (2018). L2 Interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021
RoeverC.KasperG. (2018). Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128
TurnerC. E.PurpuraJ. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in the classroom. In TsagariD.BanerjeeJ. (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–273). Boston, MA: DeGruyter Mouton.
36.
WiliamD. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
37.
YinR. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guildford Press.
38.
YounS. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113
39.
YoungR. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. II (pp. 426–443). New York: Routledge.
