The paper presents a methodology for describing in generative terms the structure of urban fabrics: the objective is to transfer conceptually the knowledge about the domain of urban space into a hierarchical and interrelated semantic structure with relevant concepts, elements and their mutual relationships, providing explicit and unambiguous definitions. The conceptual and operational instrument adopted for this purpose is the ontology, a method of knowledge representation and management coming from the Artificial Intelligence. This approach aims to create a customisable digital design tool, to support the designer in the early stages of urban design process, such as street pattern and massing definition, by generating in real time a number of design scenarios, starting from a large number of constraints and requests. This paper focuses on the knowledge formalisation aspects of the research that is the basis for the generative modelling of urban space.
Al-SayedK (2014) Thinking systems in urban design: A prioritised structure model. In: CarmonaM (ed.) Explorations in Urban Design, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 169–181.
BennettB (1994) Spatial reasoning with propositional logic. In: DoyleJSandewallETorassoP (eds) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, Bonn: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 51–62.
4.
BennettB (1996) Modal logics for qualitative spatial reasoning. Bulletin of the IGPL4(1): 23–45.
5.
BeirãoJNDuarteJStouffsR (2012) Designing with urban induction patterns: A methodological approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(4): 665–682.
6.
Beirão JN, Montenegro N, Gil J, et al. (2009) The city as a street system: A street description for a city ontology. In: SIGraDi 2009 – Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 16–18 November 2009, pp.132–134.
7.
BillenRZakiCServièresM (2012) Developing an ontology of space: Application to 3D city modelling. In: LeducTMoreauGBillenR (eds) Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, pp. 1–14.
8.
BrennanJMartinE (2002) Foundations for a formalism of nearness. Lecture Notes in Computer Science2557: 71–82.
9.
Camacho-HübnerE (2011) URMOPRO: An example of an urban ontology for the formalization of morphological processes. In: FalquetGMétralCTellerJTweedC (eds) Ontologies in Urban Development Projects, London: Springer, pp. 173–178.
10.
Camacho-HübnerEGolayF (2007) Preliminary insights on continuity and evolution of concepts for the development of an urban morphological process ontology. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 95–107.
11.
CaniggiaGMaffeiGL (1979) Lettura Dell’Edilizia di Base, Firenze: Alinea.
12.
CaniggiaGMaffeiGL (2001) Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building, Firenze: Alinea.
13.
CimianoPVölkerJ (2005) Text2Onto – A Framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In: MontoyoAMunozRMetaisE (eds) Natural Language to Information Systems, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 227–238.
14.
ConzenMP (2001) The study of urban form in the United States. Urban Morphology5(1): 3–14.
15.
ConzenMRG (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-Plan Analysis, London, UK: Institute of British Geographers Publication.
16.
DarinM (1998) The study of urban form in France. Urban Morphology2(2): 63–76.
17.
DuarteJPBeiraoJNMontenegroN (2012) City induction: A model for formulating, generating, and evaluating urban designs. In: AschwandenGHalatschJWonkaP (eds) Digital Urban Modeling and Simulation, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 73–98.
18.
Fernández-LópezMSuárez-FigueroaMCGómez-PérezA (2012) Ontology development by reuse. In: Suárez-FigueroaMCGómez-PérezAMottaEGangemiA (eds) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 147–170.
19.
GruberTR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition5(2): 199–220.
20.
GruberT (2009) Ontology. In: LiuLTamer ÖzsuM (eds) The Encyclopedia of Database Systems, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1963–1965.
21.
GrütterRBauer-MessmerB (2007) Towards spatial reasoning in the semantic web: A Hybrid Knowledge Representation System Architecture. In: FabrikantSIWachowiczM (eds) The European Information Society, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 349–364.
22.
GuarinoNGiarettaP (1995) Ontologies and knowledge bases: Towards a terminological clarification. In: MarsN (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 25–32.
23.
GuoSSChanCHarrisonR (2011) Decision support tools for ontological engineering. In: ChiangJ (ed.) Efficient Decision Support Systems – Practice and Challenges From Current to Future, Rijeka: Intech, pp. 49–66.
24.
Hartmann J, Spyns P, Giboin A, et al. (2004) Methods for ontology evaluation. KWeb Deliverable D1.2.3, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
25.
HillierB (1996) Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HofmeisterB (2004) The study of urban form in Germany. Urban Morphology8(1): 3–12.
27.
HogenboomFBorgmanBFrasincarF (2010) Spatial knowledge representation on the semantic web. In: GuerreroJE (ed.) Proceedings 2010 IEEE fourth international conference on semantic computing: ICSC 2010, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 252–259.
28.
KeetCMArtaleA (2008) Representing and reasoning over a taxonomy of part-whole relations. Applied Ontology3(1–2): 91–110.
29.
KloecklKSennORattiC (2012) Enabling the real-time city: LIVE Singapore!. Journal of Urban Technology19(2): 89–112.
30.
Kropf K (1993) An enquiry into the definition of built form in urban morphology PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
31.
KropfK (1996) Urban tissue and the character of towns. Urban Design International1(3): 247–263.
32.
KropfK (2014) Ambiguity in definition of urban form. Urban Morphology18(1): 41–57.
33.
KrügerM (1979) An approach to built-form connectivity at an urban scale: System description and its representation. Environment and Planning B6(1): 67–88.
34.
KrügerM (1980) An approach to built-form connectivity at an urban scale: Relationships between built-form connectivity, adjacency measures and urban spatial structure. Environment and Planning B7(2): 163–194.
35.
LacastaJNogueras-IsoJZarazaga-SoriaFJ (2007) Generating an urban domain ontology through the merging of cross-domain lexical ontologies. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 60–74.
36.
Mark W (1995) Ontology as knowledge base architecture. In: Proceedings of the Banff knowledge acquisition workshop, Banff, Canada, pp.146–156.
37.
MarzotN (2002) The study of urban form in Italy. Urban Morphology6(2): 59–73.
38.
MétralCFalquetGVonlanthenM (2007) An ontology-based model for urban planning communication. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 61–72.
39.
Mounce S, Brewster C, Ashley R, et al. (2009) Knowledge management for more sustainable water systems. In: Teller J, Cutting-Decelle AF and Billen R (eds) Future of Urban Ontologies. Proceedings of the Final Conference of the COST Action C21–Towntology: Urban Ontologies for an Improved Communication in Urban Development Projects, Liege, 9–10 March 2009, pp. 39–49.
40.
MuratoriS (1960) Studi per una Operante Storia Urbana di Venezia, Roma: Istituto Poligrafico.
41.
Niles I and Pease A (2001) Origins of the IEEE standard upper ontology. In: Working notes of the IJCAI-2001 workshop on the IEEE standard upper Ontology, Seattle, pp 37–42.
42.
Nogueras-IsoJLópezFJLacastaJ (2007) Building an address gazetteer on top of an urban network ontology. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 157–167.
43.
Nogueras-IsoJLacastaJTellerJ (2011) Transformation of urban knowledge sources to ontologies. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, London: Springer, pp. 153–166.
44.
RandellDACuiZCohnAG (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning, Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 165–176.
45.
RenzJNebelB (2007) Qualitative spatial reasoning using constraint calculi. In: AielloMPratt-HartmannIEvan BenthemJF (eds) Handbook of Spatial Logics, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 161–215.
46.
RomanoM (1993) L’estetica Della Città Europea: Forme e Immagini, Torino: Einaudi.
47.
RomanoM (2004) Costruire le Città, Milano: Skira.
48.
RousseyCPinetFAh KangM (2011) An introduction to ontologies and ontology engineering. In: FalquetGMétralCTellerJTweedC (eds) Ontologies in Urban Development Projects, London: Springer, pp. 9–38.
49.
Samassa F (1997) La Casa Con il Giardino. L’Architettura di Una Forma Dell’Abitare. PhD Thesis, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy.
50.
SowaJF (1995) Top-Level Ontological Categories. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies43(5/6): 669–685.
51.
SteadmanPBrownFRickabyP (1991) Studies in the morphology of the English building stock. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design18(1): 85–98.
52.
SteadmanPBruhnsHRHoltierS (2000) A classification of built forms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27(1): 73–92.
53.
Trausan-MatuS (2007) A socio-cultural ontology for urban development. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 121–130.
Van der VetPEMarsNJI (1998) Bottom-up construction of ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10(4): 513–526.
57.
VidlerA (2011) The Scenes of the Street and Other Essays, New York, NY: Monacelli Press.
58.
VilagrasaIJ (1998) The study of urban form in Spain. Urban Morphology2(1): 35–44.
59.
VilchesBLBernabéPMASuárez-FigueroaMC (2007) Towntology & hydrOntology: Relationship between urban and hydrographic features in the geographic information domain. In: TellerJLeeJRousseyC (eds) Ontologies for Urban Development, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 73–84.
60.
Villazón-TerrazasBM (2012) A method for reusing and re-engineering non-ontological resources for building ontologies, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 1–275.
61.
WhitehandJWR (2001) British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology5(2): 103–109.
62.
Wielinga B, Schreiber A Th, Jansweijer W, et al. (1994) Framework and formalism for expressing ontologies. ESPRIT Project 8145 KACTUS, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.[Free deliverable DO1b.1].
63.
WinstonMEChaffinRHerrmannD (1987) A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science11(4): 417–444.
